Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tim Whitaker
dblp:314/6946
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-3792-3901ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 65% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 22% Learning theory · 6% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prune and Tune Ensembles: Low-Cost Ensemble Learning with Sparse Independent Subnetworks · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prune and Tune Ensembles: Low-Cost Ensemble Learning with Sparse Independent Subnetworks · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prune and Tune Ensembles: Low-Cost Ensemble Learning with Sparse Independent Subnetworks · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparse neural network
sparse subnetwork |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prune and Tune Ensembles: Low-Cost Ensemble Learning with Sparse Independent Subnetworks · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Prune and Tune Ensembles: Low-Cost Ensemble Learning with Sparse Independent Subnetworks · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Prune and Tune Ensembles: Low-Cost Ensemble Learning with Sparse Independent Subnetworks · AAAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pruning · 0.6one-cycle tuning · 0.6anti-random pruning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Synaptic Stripping: How Pruning Can Bring Dead Neurons Back to LifeabstractRectified Linear Units (ReLU) are the default choice for activation functions in deep neural networks. While they demonstrate excellent empirical performance, ReLU activations can fall victim to the dead neuron problem. In these cases, the weights feeding into a neuron end up being pushed into a state where the neuron outputs zero for all inputs. Consequently, the gradient is also zero for all inputs, which means that the weights which feed into the neuron cannot update. The neuron is not able to recover from direct back propagation and model capacity is reduced as those parameters can no longer be further optimized. Inspired by a neurological process of the same name, we introduce Synaptic Stripping as a means to combat this dead neuron problem. By automatically removing problematic connections during training, we can regenerate dead neurons and significantly improve model capacity and parametric utilization. Synaptic Stripping is easy to implement and results in sparse networks that are more efficient than the dense networks they are derived from. We conduct several ablation studies to investigate these dynamics as a function of network width and depth and we conduct an exploration of Synaptic Stripping with Vision Transformers on a variety of benchmark datasets. Tim Whitaker, L. Darrell Whitley |
IJCNN | 1 |
| 2023 | Interpretable Diversity Analysis: Visualizing Feature Representations in Low-Cost EnsemblesabstractDiversity is an important consideration in the construction of robust neural network ensembles. A collection of well trained models will generalize better if they are diverse in the patterns they respond to and the predictions they make. Diversity is especially important for low-cost ensemble methods because members often share network structure in order to avoid training several independent models from scratch. Diversity is traditionally analyzed by measuring differences between the outputs of models. However, this gives little insight into how knowledge representations differ between ensemble members. This paper introduces several interpretability methods that can be used to qualitatively analyze diversity. We demonstrate these techniques by comparing the diversity of feature representations between child networks using two low-cost ensemble algorithms, Snapshot Ensembles and Prune and Tune Ensembles. We use the same pre-trained parent network as a starting point for both methods which allows us to explore how feature representations evolve over time. This approach to diversity analysis can lead to valuable insights and new perspectives for how we measure and promote diversity in ensemble methods. Tim Whitaker, L. Darrell Whitley |
IJCNN | 1 |
| 2022 | Prune and Tune Ensembles: Low-Cost Ensemble Learning with Sparse Independent SubnetworksabstractEnsemble Learning is an effective method for improving generalization in machine learning. However, as state-of-the-art neural networks grow larger, the computational cost associated with training several independent networks becomes expensive. We introduce a fast, low-cost method for creating diverse ensembles of neural networks without needing to train multiple models from scratch. We do this by first training a single parent network. We then create child networks by cloning the parent and dramatically pruning the parameters of each child to create an ensemble of members with unique and diverse topologies. We then briefly train each child network for a small number of epochs, which now converge significantly faster when compared to training from scratch. We explore various ways to maximize diversity in the child networks, including the use of anti-random pruning and one-cycle tuning. This diversity enables "Prune and Tune" ensembles to achieve results that are competitive with traditional ensembles at a fraction of the training cost. We benchmark our approach against state of the art low-cost ensemble methods and display marked improvement in both accuracy and uncertainty estimation on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. Tim Whitaker, L. Darrell Whitley |
AAAI | 1 |