Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lennart Bittel
dblp:314/7555
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 75% Computational complexity · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
circuit depth |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Optimal Depth of Variational Quantum Algorithms Is QCMA-Hard to Approximate · CCC 2023 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
QCMA |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Optimal Depth of Variational Quantum Algorithms Is QCMA-Hard to Approximate · CCC 2023 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum complexity theory |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Optimal Depth of Variational Quantum Algorithms Is QCMA-Hard to Approximate · CCC 2023 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
variational quantum algorithms |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Optimal Depth of Variational Quantum Algorithms Is QCMA-Hard to Approximate · CCC 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantum approximate optimization algorithm · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | The Optimal Depth of Variational Quantum Algorithms Is QCMA-Hard to ApproximateabstractVariational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs), such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) of [Farhi, Goldstone, Gutmann, 2014], have seen intense study towards near-term applications on quantum hardware. A crucial parameter for VQAs is the \emph{depth} of the variational ``ansatz'' used -- the smaller the depth, the more amenable the ansatz is to near-term quantum hardware in that it gives the circuit a chance to be fully executed before the system decoheres. In this work, we show that approximating the optimal depth for a given VQA ansatz is intractable. Formally, we show that for any constant $ε>0$, it is QCMA-hard to approximate the optimal depth of a VQA ansatz within multiplicative factor $N^{1-ε}$, for $N$ denoting the encoding size of the VQA instance. (Here, Quantum Classical Merlin-Arthur (QCMA) is a quantum generalization of NP.) We then show that this hardness persists in the even ``simpler'' QAOA-type settings. To our knowledge, this yields the first natural QCMA-hard-to-approximate problems. Lennart Bittel, Sevag Gharibian, Martin Kliesch |
CCC | 1 |