Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lennart Bittel

dblp:314/7555 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Quantum computing and quantum information · 75% Computational complexity · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
circuit depth
0.712023
The Optimal Depth of Variational Quantum Algorithms Is QCMA-Hard to Approximate · CCC 2023
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
QCMA
0.712023
The Optimal Depth of Variational Quantum Algorithms Is QCMA-Hard to Approximate · CCC 2023
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum complexity theory
0.712023
The Optimal Depth of Variational Quantum Algorithms Is QCMA-Hard to Approximate · CCC 2023
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
variational quantum algorithms
0.712023
The Optimal Depth of Variational Quantum Algorithms Is QCMA-Hard to Approximate · CCC 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantum approximate optimization algorithm · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 The Optimal Depth of Variational Quantum Algorithms Is QCMA-Hard to Approximate
abstract
Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs), such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) of [Farhi, Goldstone, Gutmann, 2014], have seen intense study towards near-term applications on quantum hardware. A crucial parameter for VQAs is the \emph{depth} of the variational ``ansatz'' used -- the smaller the depth, the more amenable the ansatz is to near-term quantum hardware in that it gives the circuit a chance to be fully executed before the system decoheres. In this work, we show that approximating the optimal depth for a given VQA ansatz is intractable. Formally, we show that for any constant $ε>0$, it is QCMA-hard to approximate the optimal depth of a VQA ansatz within multiplicative factor $N^{1-ε}$, for $N$ denoting the encoding size of the VQA instance. (Here, Quantum Classical Merlin-Arthur (QCMA) is a quantum generalization of NP.) We then show that this hardness persists in the even ``simpler'' QAOA-type settings. To our knowledge, this yields the first natural QCMA-hard-to-approximate problems.
Lennart Bittel, Sevag Gharibian, Martin Kliesch
CCC1