Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Anup Shakya

dblp:315/3931 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-4149-9943ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 70% Trustworthy machine learning · 30%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.712023
On the Verification of Embeddings with Hybrid Markov Logic · ICDM 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning › probabilistic logic
markov logic networks
0.712023
On the Verification of Embeddings with Hybrid Markov Logic · ICDM 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
probabilistic logic
0.712023
On the Verification of Embeddings with Hybrid Markov Logic · ICDM 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic first-order logic · 0.7mixed-integer linear programming · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 "Can A Language Model Represent Math Strategies?": Learning Math Strategies from Big Data using BERT
Abisha Thapa Magar, Anup Shakya, Stephen Fancsali, Vasile Rus, April Murphy, Steven Ritter 0001, Deepak Venugopal
LAK2
2025 Reparameterizing Hybrid Markov Logic Networks to handle Covariate-Shift in Representations
abstract
We utilize Hybrid Markov Logic Networks (HMLNs) to combine embeddings learned from a Deep Neural Network (DNN) with symbolic relational knowledge. Since a DNN may not always learn optimal embeddings, we develop a mixture model to reduce variance in the HMLN parameterization. Further, we perform inference in our model that is robust to covariate shifts that may occur in the DNN embeddings by reparameterizing the HMLN. We evaluate our approach on Graph Neural Networks and show that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods that combine relational knowledge with DNN embeddings when we introduce covariate shifts in the embeddings. Further, we demonstrate the utility of our approach in inferring latent student knowledge in a cognitive model called Deep Knowledge Tracing.
Anup Shakya, Abisha Thapa Magar, Somdeb Sarkhel, Deepak Venugopal
UAI1
2023 Verifying Relational Explanations: A Probabilistic Approach
abstract
Explanations on relational data are hard to verify since the explanation structures are more complex (e.g. graphs). To verify interpretable explanations (e.g. explanations of predictions made in images, text, etc.), typically human subjects are used since it does not necessarily require a lot of expertise. However, to verify the quality of a relational explanation requires expertise and is hard to scale-up. GNNExplainer is arguably one of the most popular explanation methods for Graph Neural Networks. In this paper, we develop an approach where we assess the uncertainty in explanations generated by GNNExplainer. Specifically, we ask the explainer to generate explanations for several counterfactual examples. We generate these examples as symmetric approximations of the relational structure in the original data. From these explanations, we learn a factor graph model to quantity uncertainty in an explanation. Our results on several datasets show that our approach can help verify explanations from GNNExplainer by reliably estimating the uncertainty of a relation specified in the explanation.
Abisha Thapa Magar, Anup Shakya, Somdeb Sarkhel, Deepak Venugopal
IEEE Big Data2
2023 Scalable and Equitable Math Problem Solving Strategy Prediction in Big Educational Data
Anup Shakya, Vasile Rus, Deepak Venugopal
EDM1
2023 On the Verification of Embeddings with Hybrid Markov Logic
abstract
The standard approach to verify representations learned by Deep Neural Networks is to use them in specific tasks such as classification or regression, and measure their performance based on accuracy in such tasks. However, in many cases, we would want to verify more complex properties of a learned representation. To do this, we propose a framework based on a probabilistic first-order language, namely, Hybrid Markov Logic Networks (HMLNs) where we specify properties over embeddings mixed with symbolic domain knowledge. We present an approach to learn parameters for the properties within this framework. Further, we develop a verification method to test embeddings in this framework by encoding this task as a Mixed Integer Linear Program for which we can leverage existing state-of-the-art solvers. We illustrate verification in Graph Neural Networks, Deep Knowledge Tracing and Intelligent Tutoring Systems to demonstrate the generality of our approach.
Anup Shakya, Abisha Thapa Magar, Somdeb Sarkhel, Deepak Venugopal
ICDM1
2021 Student Strategy Prediction using a Neuro-Symbolic Approach
Anup Shakya, Vasile Rus, Deepak Venugopal
EDM1