Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniela Ivanova
dblp:315/4290
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3710-7413ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 77% Segmentation and scene understanding · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DiffInfinite: Large Mask-Image Synthesis via Parallel Random Patch Diffusion in Histopathology · NeurIPS 2023 |
Medical and health informatics
computational pathology |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DiffInfinite: Large Mask-Image Synthesis via Parallel Random Patch Diffusion in Histopathology · NeurIPS 2023 |
Medical and health informatics › computational pathology
histopathology image synthesis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DiffInfinite: Large Mask-Image Synthesis via Parallel Random Patch Diffusion in Histopathology · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | DiffInfinite: Large Mask-Image Synthesis via Parallel Random Patch Diffusion in Histopathology · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parallel patch diffusion · 1.3hierarchical diffusion · 1.3classifier-free guidance · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Pixel-to-4D: Camera-Controlled Image-to-Video Generation with Dynamic 3D Gaussians
Melonie de Almeida, Daniela Ivanova, John Williamson 0001, Paul Henderson |
ICPR (3) | 2 |
| 2026 | Splat-Portrait: Generalizing Talking Heads with Gaussian Splatting
Melonie de Almeida, Daniela Ivanova, Nicolas Pugeault, Paul Henderson |
MMM (1) | 3 |
| 2026 | Unsupervised Segmentation by Diffusing, Walking and CuttingabstractWe propose a zero-shot unsupervised image segmentation method by utilising self-attention activations extracted from Stable Diffusion. We demonstrate that self-attention can directly be interpreted as transition probabilities in a Markov random walk between image patches. This property enables us to modulate multi-hop relationships through matrix exponentiation, which captures k-step transitions between patches. We then construct a graph representation based on self-attention feature similarity and apply Normalised Cuts to cluster them. We quantitatively analyse the effects of incorporating multi-node paths when constructing the NCuts adjacency matrix, showing that higher-order transitions enhance hierarchical relationships in the proposed segmentations. Finally, we describe an approach to automatically determine the NCut threshold criterion, avoiding the need to manually tune it. Our approach surpasses all existing methods for zero-shot unsupervised segmentation based on pretrained diffusion models features, achieving state-of-the-art results on COCO-Stuff-27, Cityscapes and ADE20K. Daniela Ivanova, Marco Aversa, Paul Henderson, John Williamson 0001 |
WACV | 1 |
| 2025 | ARTeFACT: Benchmarking Segmentation Models on Diverse Analogue Media DamageabstractAccurately detecting and classifying damage in analogue media such as paintings, photographs, textiles, mosaics, and frescoes is essential for cultural heritage preservation. While machine learning models excel in correcting degradation if the damage operator is known a priori, we show that they fail to robustly predict where the damage is even after supervised training; thus, reliable damage detection remains a challenge. Motivated by this, we introduce ARTeFACT, a dataset for damage detection in diverse types analogue media, with over 11,000 annotations covering 15 kinds of damage across various subjects, media, and historical provenance. Furthermore, we contribute human-verified text prompts describing the semantic contents of the images, and derive additional textual descriptions of the annotated damage. We evaluate CNN, transformer, diffusion-based segmentation models, and foundation vision models in zero-shot, supervised, unsupervised and text-guided settings, revealing their limitations in generalising across media types. Our dataset is available at https://daniela997.github.ioIARTeFACTI as the first-of-its-kind benchmark for analogue media damage detection and restoration. Daniela Ivanova, Marco Aversa, Paul Henderson, John Williamson 0001 |
WACV | 1 |
| 2023 | DiffInfinite: Large Mask-Image Synthesis via Parallel Random Patch Diffusion in HistopathologyabstractWe present DiffInfinite, a hierarchical diffusion model that generates arbitrarily large histological images while preserving long-range correlation structural information. Our approach first generates synthetic segmentation masks, subsequently used as conditions for the high-fidelity generative diffusion process. The proposed sampling method can be scaled up to any desired image size while only requiring small patches for fast training. Moreover, it can be parallelized more efficiently than previous large-content generation methods while avoiding tiling artifacts. The training leverages classifier-free guidance to augment a small, sparsely annotated dataset with unlabelled data. Our method alleviates unique challenges in histopathological imaging practice: large-scale information, costly manual annotation, and protective data handling. The biological plausibility of DiffInfinite data is evaluated in a survey by ten experienced pathologists as well as a downstream classification and segmentation task. Samples from the model score strongly on anti-copying metrics which is relevant for the protection of patient data. Marco Aversa, Gabriel Nobis, Miriam Hägele, Kai Standvoss, Mihaela Chirica, Roderick Murray-Smith, Ahmed Alaa 0001, Lukas Ruff, Daniela Ivanova, Wojciech Samek, Frederick Klauschen, Bruno Sanguinetti, Luis Oala |
NeurIPS | 9 |
| 2023 | Simulating analogue film damage to analyse and improve artefact restoration on high-resolution scansabstractAbstract Digital scans of analogue photographic film typically contain artefacts such as dust and scratches. Automated removal of these is an important part of preservation and dissemination of photographs of historical and cultural importance. While state‐of‐the‐art deep learning models have shown impressive results in general image inpainting and denoising, film artefact removal is an understudied problem. It has particularly challenging requirements, due to the complex nature of analogue damage, the high resolution of film scans, and potential ambiguities in the restoration. There are no publicly available high‐quality datasets of real‐world analogue film damage for training and evaluation, making quantitative studies impossible. We address the lack of ground‐truth data for evaluation by collecting a dataset of 4K damaged analogue film scans paired with manually‐restored versions produced by a human expert, allowing quantitative evaluation of restoration performance. We have made the dataset available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21803304. We construct a larger synthetic dataset of damaged images with paired clean versions using a statistical model of artefact shape and occurrence learnt from real, heavily‐damaged images. We carefully validate the realism of the simulated damage via a human perceptual study, showing that even expert users find our synthetic damage indistinguishable from real. In addition, we demonstrate that training with our synthetically damaged dataset leads to improved artefact segmentation performance when compared to previously proposed synthetic analogue damage overlays. The synthetically damaged dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21815844, and the annotated authentic artefacts along with the resulting statistical damage model at https://github.com/daniela997/FilmDamageSimulator. Finally, we use these datasets to train and analyse the performance of eight state‐of‐the‐art image restoration methods on high‐resolution scans. We compare both methods which directly perform the restoration task on scans with artefacts, and methods which require a damage mask to be provided for the inpainting of artefacts. We modify the methods to process the inputs in a patch‐wise fashion to operate on original high resolution film scans. Daniela Ivanova, John Williamson 0001, Paul Henderson |
Comput. Graph. Forum | 1 |