Dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs) are compact graphical representations used to model probabilistic systems where interdependent random variables and their distributions evolve over time. In this paper, we study the verification of the evolution of conditional-independence (CI) propositions against temporal logic specifications. To this end, we consider two specification formalisms over CI propositions: linear temporal logic (LTL), and non-deterministic Büchi automata (NBAs). This problem has two variants. Stochastic CI properties take the given concrete probability distributions into account, while structural CI properties are viewed purely in terms of the graphical structure of the DBN. We show that deciding whether a stochastic CI proposition eventually holds is at least as hard as the Skolem problem for linear recurrence sequences, which is a long-standing open problem in number theory. On the other hand, we show that verifying the evolution of structural CI propositions against LTL and NBA specifications is in PSPACE, and is hard for both NP and coNP. We also identify natural restrictions on the graphical structure of the DBN that make the verification of structural CI properties tractable.

A fundamental question in logic and verification is the following: for which unary predicates P_1, …, P_k is the monadic second-order theory of ⟨ℕ;<,P_1,…,P_k⟩ decidable? Equivalently, for which infinite words α can we decide whether a given Büchi automaton 𝒜 accepts α? Carton and Thomas showed decidability in the case that α is a fixed point of a letter-to-word substitution σ, i.e., σ(α) = α. However, abundantly more words, e.g., Sturmian words, are characterised by a broader notion of self-similarity that involves a set S of substitutions. A word α is said to be directed by a sequence s = (σ_n)_{n ∈ ℕ} over S if there is a sequence of words (α_n)_{n ∈ ℕ} such that α₀ = α and α_n = σ_n(α_{n+1}) for all n; such α are called S-adic. We study the automaton acceptance problem for such words and prove, among others, the following: given finite S and an automaton 𝒜, we can compute an automaton ℬ that accepts s ∈ S^ω if and only if s directs a word α accepted by 𝒜. Thus we can algorithmically answer questions of the form "Which S-adic words are accepted by a given automaton 𝒜?"

In this paper we complete Büchi's proof that there is no decision algorithm for the solubility in integers of arbitrary systems of diagonal quadratic form equations, by proving the assertion that whenever $x_1^2, \cdots, x_5^2$ are five squares such that the second differences satisfy \[x_{k+2}^2 - 2 x_{k+1}^2 + x_k^2 = 2\] for $k = 1,2,3$, then they must be consecutive. This answers a question of J.~Richard~Büchi.

For which unary predicates P 1 , … , P m is the MSO theory of the structure 〈 N ; < , P 1 , … , P m 〉 decidable? We survey the state of the art, leading us to investigate combinatorial properties of almost-periodic, morphic, and toric words. In doing so, we show that if each P i can be generated by a toric dynamical system of a certain kind, then the attendant MSO theory is decidable. We give various applications of toric words, including the recent result of [1] that the MSO theory of 〈 N ; < , { 2 n : n ∈ N } , { 3 n : n ∈ N } 〉 is decidable.

We investigate the decidability of the monadic second-order (MSO) theory of the structure (N; <, P1,…,Pk), for various unary predicates P1,…,Pk ⊆ N. We focus in particular on 'arithmetic' predicates arising in the study of linear recurrence sequences, such as fixed-base powers Powk = {kn : n ∈ N}, k-th powers Nk = {nk : n ∈ N}, and the set of terms of the Fibonacci sequence Fib = {0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13,…} (and similarly for other linear recurrence sequences having a single, non-repeated, dominant characteristic root). We obtain several new unconditional and conditional decidability results, a select sample of which are the following:

We consider the following Markov Reachability decision problems that view Markov Chains as Linear Dynamical Systems: given a finite, rational Markov Chain, source and target states, and a rational threshold, does the probability of reaching the target from the source at the nth step: (i) equal the threshold for some n? (ii) cross the threshold for some n? (iii) cross the threshold for infinitely many n? These problems are respectively known to be equivalent to the Skolem, Positivity, and Ultimate Positivity problems for Linear Recurrence Sequences (LRS), number-theoretic problems whose decidability has been open for decades. We present an elementary reduction from LRS Problems to Markov Reachability Problems that improves the state of the art as follows. (a) We map LRS to ergodic (irreducible and aperiodic) Markov Chains that are ubiquitous, not least by virtue of their spectral structure, and (b) our reduction maps LRS of order k to Markov Chains of order k+1: a substantial improvement over the previous reduction that mapped LRS of order k to reducible and periodic Markov chains of order 4k+5. This contribution is significant in view of the fact that the number-theoretic hardness of verifying Linear Dynamical Systems can often be mitigated by spectral assumptions and restrictions on order.

The Skolem problem is a long-standing open problem in linear dynamical systems: can a linear recurrence sequence (LRS) ever reach 0 from a given initial configuration? Similarly, the positivity problem asks whether the LRS stays positive from an initial configuration. Deciding Skolem (or positivity) has been open for half a century: the best known decidability results are for LRS with special properties (e.g., low order recurrences). But these problems are easier for "uninitialized" variants, where the initial configuration is not fixed but can vary arbitrarily: checking if there is an initial configuration from which the LRS stays positive can be decided in polynomial time (Tiwari in 2004, Braverman in 2006). In this paper, we consider problems that lie between the initialized and uninitialized variants. More precisely, we ask if 0 (resp. negative numbers) can be avoided from every initial configuration in a neighborhood of a given initial configuration. This can be considered as a robust variant of the Skolem (resp. positivity) problem. We show that these problems lie at the frontier of decidability: if the neighbourhood is given as part of the input, then robust Skolem and robust positivity are Diophantine hard, i.e., solving either would entail major breakthroughs in Diophantine approximations, as happens for (non-robust) positivity. However, if one asks whether such a neighbourhood exists, then the problems turn out to be decidable with PSPACE complexity. Our techniques also allow us to tackle robustness for ultimate positivity, which asks whether there is a bound on the number of steps after which the LRS remains positive. There are two variants depending on whether we ask for a "uniform" bound on this number of steps. For the non-uniform variant, when the neighbourhood is open, the problem turns out to be tractable, even when the neighbourhood is given as input.

Abstract We consider the verification of liveness properties for concurrent programs running on weak memory models. To that end, we identify notions of fairness that preclude demonic non-determinism, are motivated by practical observations, and are amenable to algorithmic techniques. We provide both logical and stochastic definitions of our fairness notions, and prove that they are equivalent in the context of liveness verification. In particular, we show that our fairness allows us to reduce the liveness problem (repeated control state reachability) to the problem of simple control state reachability. We show that this is a general phenomenon by developing a uniform framework which serves as the formal foundation of our fairness definition, and can be instantiated to a wide landscape of memory models. These models include SC, TSO, PSO, (Strong/Weak) Release-Acquire, Strong Coherence, FIFO-consistency, and RMO.

Linear Recurrence Sequences (LRS) are a fundamental mathematical primitive for a plethora of applications such as the verification of probabilistic systems, model checking, computational biology, and economics. Positivity (are all terms of the given LRS non-negative?) and Ultimate Positivity (are all but finitely many terms of the given LRS non-negative?) are important open number-theoretic decision problems. Recently, the robust versions of these problems, that ask whether the LRS is (Ultimately) Positive despite small perturbations to its initialisation, have gained attention as a means to model the imprecision that arises in practical settings. However, the state of the art is ill-equipped to reason about imprecision when its extent is explicitly specified. In this paper, we consider Robust Positivity and Ultimate Positivity problems where the neighbourhood of the initialisation, expressed in a natural and general format, is also part of the input. We contribute by proving sharp decidability results: decision procedures at orders our techniques are unable to handle for general LRS would entail significant number-theoretic breakthroughs.

The Skolem problem is a long-standing open problem in linear dynamical systems: can a linear recurrence sequence (LRS) ever reach 0 from a given initial configuration? Similarly, the positivity problem asks whether the LRS stays positive from an initial configuration. Deciding Skolem (or positivity) has been open for half a century: The best known decidability results are for LRS with special properties (e.g., low order recurrences). On the other hand, these problems are much easier for "uninitialized" variants, where the initial configuration is not fixed but can vary arbitrarily: checking if there is an initial configuration from which the LRS stays positive can be decided by polynomial time algorithms (Tiwari in 2004, Braverman in 2006). In this paper, we consider problems that lie between the initialized and uninitialized variant. More precisely, we ask if 0 (resp. negative numbers) can be avoided from every initial configuration in a neighborhood of a given initial configuration. This can be considered as a robust variant of the Skolem (resp. positivity) problem. We show that these problems lie at the frontier of decidability: if the neighborhood is given as part of the input, then robust Skolem and robust positivity are Diophantine-hard, i.e., solving either would entail major breakthrough in Diophantine approximations, as happens for (non-robust) positivity. Interestingly, this is the first Diophantine-hardness result on a variant of the Skolem problem, to the best of our knowledge. On the other hand, if one asks whether such a neighborhood exists, then the problems turn out to be decidable in their full generality, with PSPACE complexity. Our analysis is based on the set of initial configurations such that positivity holds, which leads to new insights into these difficult problems, and interesting geometrical interpretations.