Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brendan Park

dblp:316/0137 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-5127-7168ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 28% Information extraction and text analysis · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 28%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
Picturing Ambiguity: A Visual Twist on the Winograd Schema Challenge · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › coreference resolution
pronoun resolution
0.812024
Picturing Ambiguity: A Visual Twist on the Winograd Schema Challenge · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › conditional generative model
text-to-image models
0.812024
Picturing Ambiguity: A Visual Twist on the Winograd Schema Challenge · ACL (1) 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.212024
Picturing Ambiguity: A Visual Twist on the Winograd Schema Challenge · ACL (1) 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
winograd schema challenge
0.212024
Picturing Ambiguity: A Visual Twist on the Winograd Schema Challenge · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

diffusion attentive attribution maps · 0.8GPT-4 · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Keypoint-Guided Ophidian Transformation for String-Shaped Data Augmentation
abstract
Image classification tasks in scientific research often struggle with limited data, particularly when few images are available per class, necessitating effective data augmentation strategies. For snakes and other string-shaped objects, traditional augmentation methods such as flipping, adding noise, or altering colour prove inadequate in enhancing classification accuracy. This paper introduces KGOT (Keypoint-Guided Ophidian Transformation), a novel image augmentation technique designed to generate realistic, non-linear transformations of string-shaped objects. KGOT first straightens the snake image, then warps it according to a reference curve defined by key points, effectively inverting the straightening process. By utilizing advanced curve interpolation, pixel mapping, and post-processing techniques, KGOT ensures smooth, biologically plausible deformations while preserving important individual-specific features. Our experiments demonstrate that KGOT-augmented data increase accuracy compared to the traditional augmentation method using geographic transformation techniques. Although some limitations persist in scenarios where snake bodies overlap, the success of KGOT augmentation provides valuable information on factors that improve classification performance. This approach holds promise not only for snake individual identification but also for a broader range of applications involving string-shaped object classification tasks.
Tszyi Kwok, Brendan Park, Katharine Yagi, Anne Yagi, Chunsheng Yang, Min Liao
CIBCB2
2024 Picturing Ambiguity: A Visual Twist on the Winograd Schema Challenge
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success in tasks like the Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC), showcasing advanced textual common-sense reasoning.However, applying this reasoning to multimodal domains, where understanding text and images together is essential, remains a substantial challenge.To address this, we introduce WINOVIS, a novel dataset specifically designed to probe text-to-image models on pronoun disambiguation within multimodal contexts.Utilizing GPT-4 for prompt generation and Diffusion Attentive Attribution Maps (DAAM) for heatmap analysis, we propose a novel evaluation framework that isolates the models' ability in pronoun disambiguation from other visual processing challenges.Evaluation of successive model versions reveals that, despite incremental advancements, Stable Diffusion 2.0 achieves a precision of 56.7% on WINOVIS, showing minimal improvement from past iterations and only marginally surpassing random guessing.Further error analysis identifies important areas for future research aimed at advancing text-to-image models in their ability to interpret and interact with the complex visual world.
Brendan Park, Madeline Janecek, Naser Ezzati-Jivan, Ali Emami
ACL (1)1
2021 Automated Cause Analysis of Latency Outliers Using System-Level Dependency Graphs
abstract
Detecting performance issues and identifying their root causes in the runtime is a challenging task. Typically, developers use methods such as logging and tracing to identify bottlenecks. These solutions are, however, not ideal as they are time-consuming and require manual effort. In this paper, we propose a method to automate the task of detecting latency outliers using system-level traces and then comparing them to identify the root cause(s). Our method makes use of dependency graphs to show internal interactions between threads and system resources. With these graphs, one can pinpoint where performance issues occur. However, a single trace can be composed of a large number of requests, each generating one graph. To automate the task of identifying outliers within the dataset, we use machine learning density-based models and statistical calculations such as$Z$-score. Our evaluation shows an accuracy greater than 97 % on outlier detection, making them appropriate for in-production servers and industry-level use cases.
Sneh Patel, Brendan Park, Naser Ezzati-Jivan, Quentin Fournier
QRS2