Raja Swaminathan

dblp:316/3184 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Realizing the AMD Exascale Heterogeneous Processor Vision : Industry Product
abstract
AMD had previously detailed its exascale research journey from initial targets and requirements to the development and evolution of its vision of a high-performance computing (HPC) accelerated processing unit (APU), dubbed the Exascale Heterogeneous Processor or EHP. At the conclusion of that work, the learnings were integrated into the design of the node architecture that went into the Frontier supercomputer, the world’s first exascale machine. However, while the Frontier node architecture embodied many of the attributes of the EHP concept, advanced heterogeneous integration capabilities at the time were not yet sufficiently mature to realize our vision of a fully-integrated APU for HPC and AI. In this paper, we finish the EHP’s story by digging deeper into why an APU was not the right solution at the time of our first exascale architecture, what the shortcomings were of previous EHP concepts, and how AMD further evolved the concept into the AMD Instinct™ MI300A APU. MI300A is the culmination of years of AMD developments in advanced packaging technologies, its APU hardware and software, and the next step in our highly effective chiplet strategy to not only deliver a groundbreaking design for exascale computing, but to also meet the demands of new large-language model and generative AI applications.
Alan Smith 0003, Gabriel H. Loh, Michael J. Schulte, Mike Ignatowski, Samuel Naffziger, Mike Mantor, Nathan Kalyanasundharam, Vamsi Alla, Nicholas Malaya, Joseph L. Greathouse, Eric Chapman, Raja Swaminathan
ISCA12
2023 The Next Era for Chiplet Innovation
abstract
Moore's Law is slowing down and the associated costs are simultaneously increasing. These pressures have given rise to new approaches utilizing advanced packaging and integration such as chiplets, interposers, and$3\mathrm{D}$stacking. We first describe the key technology drivers and constraints that motivate chiplet-based architectures, exploring several product case studies to highlight how different chiplet strategies have been developed to address different design objectives. We detail multiple generations of chiplet-based CPU architectures as well as the recent addition of$3\mathrm{D}$stacking options to further enhance processor capabilities. Across the industry, we are still collectively in the relatively early days of advanced packaging and 3D integration. As silicon scaling only gets more challenging and expensive while demand for computation continues to soar, we anticipate the transition to a new generation of chiplet architectures that utilize increasing combinations of 2D, 2.5D, and 3D integration and packaging technologies to continue to deliver compelling SoC solutions. However, this next era for chiplet innovation will face a variety of challenges. We will explore many of these technical topics, which in turn provide rich research opportunities for the community to explore and innovate.
Gabriel H. Loh, Raja Swaminathan
DATE2