Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ki Sung Jung

dblp:316/5034 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning
0.922025
Turbulence in Focus: Benchmarking Scaling Behavior of 3D Volumetric Super-Resolution with BLASTNet 2.0 Data · NeurIPS 2023
Understanding and Estimating Error Propagation in Neural Networks for Scientific Data Analysis · ICDE 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data reduction
0.912025
Understanding and Estimating Error Propagation in Neural Networks for Scientific Data Analysis · ICDE 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model quantization
0.912025
Understanding and Estimating Error Propagation in Neural Networks for Scientific Data Analysis · ICDE 2025
Computational science and engineering › computational fluid dynamics
turbulence simulation
0.712023
Turbulence in Focus: Benchmarking Scaling Behavior of 3D Volumetric Super-Resolution with BLASTNet 2.0 Data · NeurIPS 2023
Image and video processing
super-resolution
0.712023
Turbulence in Focus: Benchmarking Scaling Behavior of 3D Volumetric Super-Resolution with BLASTNet 2.0 Data · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantization · 1.7error bound analysis · 1.7physics-based loss · 1.3neural scaling analysis · 1.3deep learning · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Understanding and Estimating Error Propagation in Neural Networks for Scientific Data Analysis
abstract
Neural networks are increasingly integrated into scientific discovery, where input data reduction and model quantization play a key role in accelerating inference. However, understanding and mitigating the impact of these techniques on output error is critical for ensuring reliable results, particularly in tasks demanding high numerical precision. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for optimizing neural network inference in scientific computing by combining data reduction and model quantization while maintaining error-controlled outcomes. We develop theoretical analyses to bound error propagation under these techniques and propose a framework that balances computational performance with error constraints. Evaluation on real-world learning-based combustion simulations and satellite image classification shows that our derived error bounds accurately predict observed errors while enabling significant computational speedup under our framework. This work highlights the potential for further leveraging advancements in modern lossy compression algorithms and hardware accelerators that support lower-precision formats.
Weiming He, Qian Gong, Jing Li 0025, Qing Liu 0002, Norbert Podhorszki, Scott Klasky, Ki Sung Jung, Cristian Lacey, Jackie Chen, Hongjian Zhu
ICDE8
2023 Turbulence in Focus: Benchmarking Scaling Behavior of 3D Volumetric Super-Resolution with BLASTNet 2.0 Data
abstract
Analysis of compressible turbulent flows is essential for applications related to propulsion, energy generation, and the environment. Here, we present BLASTNet 2.0, a 2.2 TB network-of-datasets containing 744 full-domain samples from 34 high-fidelity direct numerical simulations, which addresses the current limited availability of 3D high-fidelity reacting and non-reacting compressible turbulent flow simulation data. With this data, we benchmark a total of 49 variations of five deep learning approaches for 3D super-resolution - which can be applied for improving scientific imaging, simulations, turbulence models, as well as in computer vision applications. We perform neural scaling analysis on these models to examine the performance of different machine learning (ML) approaches, including two scientific ML techniques. We demonstrate that (i) predictive performance can scale with model size and cost, (ii) architecture matters significantly, especially for smaller models, and (iii) the benefits of physics-based losses can persist with increasing model size. The outcomes of this benchmark study are anticipated to offer insights that can aid the design of 3D super-resolution models, especially for turbulence models, while this data is expected to foster ML methods for a broad range of flow physics applications. This data is publicly available with download links and browsing tools consolidated at https://blastnet.github.io.
Wai Tong Chung, Bassem Akoush, Pushan Sharma, Alex Tamkin, Ki Sung Jung, Jacqueline Chen, Jack Guo, Davy Brouzet, Mohsen Talei, Bruno Savard, Alexei Y. Poludnenko, Matthias Ihme
NeurIPS5