Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yueying Gao
dblp:316/8771
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Image recognition and object detection · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Vision and language · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI-generated content detection
AI-generated image detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Toward Generalizable Forgery Detection and Reasoning · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2026 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image forensics
forgery detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Toward Generalizable Forgery Detection and Reasoning · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › multimodal large language model
multimodal large language model reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Toward Generalizable Forgery Detection and Reasoning · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
feature fusion · 1.0cross-attention · 1.0DINO · 1.0CLIP · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Toward Generalizable Forgery Detection and ReasoningabstractAccurate and interpretable detection of AI-generated images is essential for mitigating risks associated with AI misuse. However, the substantial domain gap among generative models makes it challenging to develop a generalizable forgery detection model. Moreover, since every pixel in an AI-generated image is synthesized, traditional saliency-based forgery explanation methods are not well suited for this task. To address these challenges, we formulate detection and explanation as a unified Forgery Detection and Reasoning task (FDR-Task), leveraging Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to provide accurate detection through reliable reasoning over forgery attributes. To facilitate this task, we introduce the Multi-Modal Forgery Reasoning dataset (MMFR-Dataset), a large-scale dataset containing 120K images across 10 generative models, with 378K reasoning annotations on forgery attributes, enabling comprehensive evaluation of the FDR-Task. Furthermore, we propose FakeReasoning, a forgery detection and reasoning framework with three key components: 1) a dual-branch visual encoder that integrates CLIP and DINO to capture both high-level semantics and low-level artifacts; 2) a Forgery-Aware Feature Fusion Module that leverages DINO's attention maps and cross-attention mechanisms to guide MLLMs toward forgery-related clues; 3) a Classification Probability Mapper that couples language modeling and forgery detection, enhancing overall performance. Experiments across multiple generative models demonstrate that FakeReasoning not only achieves robust generalization but also outperforms state-of-the-art methods on both detection and reasoning tasks. The code is available at: https://github.com/PRIS-CV/FakeReasoning. Yueying Gao, Dongliang Chang, Bingyao Yu, Haotian Qin, Muxi Diao, Lei Chen 0069, Kongming Liang, Zhanyu Ma |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |
| 2023 | Self-Supervised Adversarial Training for Robust Face Forgery Detection
Yueying Gao, Weiguo Lin, Wanshan Xu, Peibin Chen |
BMVC | 1 |
| 2022 | Shedding light on the hidden human proteome expands immunopeptidome in cancerabstractUnrestrained cellular growth and immune escape of a tumor are associated with the incidental errors of the genome and transcriptome. Advances in next-generation sequencing have identified thousands of genomic and transcriptomic aberrations that generate variant peptides that assemble the hidden proteome, further expanding the immunopeptidome. Emerging next-generation sequencing technologies and a number of computational methods estimated the abundance of immune infiltration from bulk transcriptome have advanced our understanding of tumor microenvironments. Here, we will characterize several major types of tumor-specific antigens arising from single-nucleotide variants, insertions and deletions, gene fusion, alternative splicing, RNA editing and non-coding RNAs. Finally, we summarize the current state-of-the-art computational and experimental approaches or resources and provide an integrative pipeline for the identification of candidate tumor antigens. Together, the systematic investigation of the hidden proteome in cancer will help facilitate the development of effective and durable immunotherapy targets for cancer. Yongsheng Li 0001, Yueying Gao, Shaojiang Zheng, Juan Xu 0001 |
Briefings Bioinform. | 6 |