VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Parth Mittal
dblp:317/0543
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-5608-9163ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | (Δ + 1) vertex coloring in O(n) communication
Maxime Flin, Parth Mittal |
Distributed Comput. | 2 |
| 2024 | Polynomial Pass Semi-Streaming Lower Bounds for K-Cores and DegeneracyabstractThe following question arises naturally in the study of graph streaming algorithms: Is there any graph problem which is "not too hard", in that it can be solved efficiently with total communication (nearly) linear in the number n of vertices, and for which, nonetheless, any streaming algorithm with Õ(n) space (i.e., a semi-streaming algorithm) needs a polynomial n^Ω(1) number of passes? Assadi, Chen, and Khanna [STOC 2019] were the first to prove that this is indeed the case. However, the lower bounds that they obtained are for rather non-standard graph problems. Our first main contribution is to present the first polynomial-pass lower bounds for natural "not too hard" graph problems studied previously in the streaming model: k-cores and degeneracy. We devise a novel communication protocol for both problems with near-linear communication, thus showing that k-cores and degeneracy are natural examples of "not too hard" problems. Indeed, previous work have developed single-pass semi-streaming algorithms for approximating these problems. In contrast, we prove that any semi-streaming algorithm for exactly solving these problems requires (almost) Ω(n^{1/3}) passes. The lower bound follows by a reduction from a generalization of the hidden pointer chasing (HPC) problem of Assadi, Chen, and Khanna, which is also the basis of their earlier semi-streaming lower bounds. Our second main contribution is improved round-communication lower bounds for the underlying communication problems at the basis of these reductions: - We improve the previous lower bound of Assadi, Chen, and Khanna for HPC to achieve optimal bounds for this problem. - We further observe that all current reductions from HPC can also work with a generalized version of this problem that we call MultiHPC, and prove an even stronger and optimal lower bound for this generalization. These two results collectively allow us to improve the resulting pass lower bounds for semi-streaming algorithms by a polynomial factor, namely, from n^{1/5} to n^{1/3} passes. Sepehr Assadi, Prantar Ghosh, Bruno Loff, Parth Mittal, Sagnik Mukhopadhyay |
CCC | 4 |
| 2024 | (Δ+1) Vertex Coloring in O(n) CommunicationabstractWe study the communication complexity of (Δ + 1) vertex coloring, where the edges of an n-vertex graph of maximum degree Δ are partitioned between two players. We provide a randomized protocol which uses O(n) bits of communication and ends with both players knowing the coloring. Combining this with a folklore Ω(n) lower bound, this settles the randomized communication complexity of (Δ + 1)-coloring up to constant factors. Maxime Flin, Parth Mittal |
PODC | 2 |
| 2022 | Brooks' theorem in graph streams: a single-pass semi-streaming algorithm for ∆-coloringabstractEvery graph with maximum degree Δ can be colored with (Δ+1) colors using a simple greedy algorithm. Remarkably, recent work has shown that one can find such a coloring even in the semi-streaming model: there exists a randomized algorithm that with high probability finds a (Δ+1)-coloring of the input graph in only O(n·logn) space assuming a single pass over the edges of the graph in any arbitrary order. But, in reality, one almost never needs (Δ+1) colors to properly color a graph. Indeed, the celebrated Brooks’ theorem states that every (connected) graph beside cliques and odd cycles can be colored with Δ colors. Can we find a Δ-coloring in the semi-streaming model as well? Sepehr Assadi, Parth Mittal |
STOC | 3 |