Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nick Rittler

dblp:317/1903 · also Nicholas Rittler · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 56% Efficient and distributed learning · 26% Trustworthy machine learning · 17%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
distribution learning
0.812024
Distribution Learning with Valid Outputs Beyond the Worst-Case · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.812024
Distribution Learning with Valid Outputs Beyond the Worst-Case · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.712023
Agnostic Multi-Group Active Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
agnostic active learning
0.712023
Agnostic Multi-Group Active Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › group robustness
multi-group learning
0.712023
Agnostic Multi-Group Active Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning
0.212024
Distribution Learning with Valid Outputs Beyond the Worst-Case · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
VC classes
0.212024
Distribution Learning with Valid Outputs Beyond the Worst-Case · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › consistency analysis
consistency guarantees
0.212023
A Two-Stage Active Learning Algorithm for k-Nearest Neighbors · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.212023
Agnostic Multi-Group Active Learning · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

validity queries · 0.8log loss minimization · 0.8two-stage active learning · 0.7k-nearest neighbors · 0.7disagreement-based active learning · 0.7PAC learning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Distribution Learning with Valid Outputs Beyond the Worst-Case
abstract
Generative models at times produce "invalid" outputs, such as images with generation artifacts and unnatural sounds. Validity-constrained distribution learning attempts to address this problem by requiring that the learned distribution have a provably small fraction of its mass in invalid parts of space -- something which standard loss minimization does not always ensure. To this end, a learner in this model can guide the learning via "validity queries", which allow it to ascertain the validity of individual examples. Prior work on this problem takes a worst-case stance, showing that proper learning requires an exponential number of validity queries, and demonstrating an improper algorithm which -- while generating guarantees in a wide-range of settings -- makes a relatively large polynomial number of validity queries. In this work, we take a first step towards characterizing regimes where guaranteeing validity is easier than in the worst-case. We show that when the data distribution lies in the model class and the log-loss is minimized, the number samples required to ensure validity has a weak dependence on the validity requirement. Additionally, we show that when the validity region belongs to a VC-class, a limited number of validity queries are often sufficient.
Nick Rittler, Kamalika Chaudhuri
NeurIPS1
2023 A Two-Stage Active Learning Algorithm for k-Nearest Neighbors
abstract
$k$-nearest neighbor classification is a popular non-parametric method because of desirable properties like automatic adaption to distributional scale changes. Unfortunately, it has thus far proved difficult to design active learning strategies for the training of local voting-based classifiers that naturally retain these desirable properties, and hence active learning strategies for $k$-nearest neighbor classification have been conspicuously missing from the literature. In this work, we introduce a simple and intuitive active learning algorithm for the training of $k$-nearest neighbor classifiers, the first in the literature which retains the concept of the $k$-nearest neighbor vote at prediction time. We provide consistency guarantees for a modified $k$-nearest neighbors classifier trained on samples acquired via our scheme, and show that when the conditional probability function $\mathbb{P}(Y=y|X=x)$ is sufficiently smooth and the Tsybakov noise condition holds, our actively trained classifiers converge to the Bayes optimal classifier at a faster asymptotic rate than passively trained $k$-nearest neighbor classifiers.
Nick Rittler, Kamalika Chaudhuri
ICML1
2023 Agnostic Multi-Group Active Learning
abstract
Inspired by the problem of improving classification accuracy on rare or hard subsets of a population, there has been recent interest in models of learning where the goal is to generalize to a collection of distributions, each representing a ``group''. We consider a variant of this problem from the perspective of active learning, where the learner is endowed with the power to decide which examples are labeled from each distribution in the collection, and the goal is to minimize the number of label queries while maintaining PAC-learning guarantees. Our main challenge is that standard active learning techniques such as disagreement-based active learning do not directly apply to the multi-group learning objective. We modify existing algorithms to provide a consistent active learning algorithm for an agnostic formulation of multi-group learning, which given a collection of $G$ distributions and a hypothesis class $\mathcal{H}$ with VC-dimension $d$, outputs an $\epsilon$-optimal hypothesis using $\tilde{O}\left( (\nu^2/\epsilon^2) G d \theta_{\mathcal{G}}^2 \log^2(1/\epsilon) + G\log(1/\epsilon)/\epsilon^2 \right)$ label queries, where $\theta_{\mathcal{G}}$ is the worst-case disagreement coefficient over the collection. Roughly speaking, this guarantee improves upon the label complexity of standard multi-group learning in regimes where disagreement-based active learning algorithms may be expected to succeed, and the number of groups is not too large. We also consider the special case where each distribution in the collection is individually realizable with respect to $\mathcal{H}$, and demonstrate $\tilde{O}\left( G d \theta_{\mathcal{G}} \log(1/\epsilon) \right)$ label queries are sufficient for learning in this case. We further give an approximation result for the full agnostic case inspired by the group realizable strategy.
Nick Rittler, Kamalika Chaudhuri
NeurIPS1