Recent advances have demonstrated the effectiveness of graph-based machine learning on relational databases (RDBs) for predictive tasks. Such approaches require transforming RDBs into graphs, a process we refer to as RDB-to-graph modeling, where rows of tables are represented as nodes and foreign-key relationships as edges.Yet, effective modeling of RDBs into graphs remains challenging.Specifically, there exist numerous ways to model RDBs into graphs, and performance on predictive tasks varies significantly depending on the chosen graph model of RDBs.In our analysis, we find that the best-performing graph model can yield up to a 10\% higher performance compared to the common heuristic rule for graph modeling, which remains non-trivial to identify.To foster research on intelligent RDB-to-graph modeling, we introduce RDB2G-Bench, the first benchmark framework for evaluating such methods.We construct extensive datasets covering 5 real-world RDBs and 12 predictive tasks, resulting in around 50k graph model–performance pairs for efficient and reproducible evaluations.Thanks to our precomputed datasets, we were able to benchmark 10 automatic RDB-to-graph modeling methods on the $12$ tasks about 380$\times$ faster than on-the-fly evaluation, which requires repeated GNN training.Our analysis of the datasets and benchmark results reveals key structural patterns affecting graph model effectiveness, along with practical implications for effective graph modeling.Our datasets and code are available at https://github.com/chlehdwon/RDB2G-Bench.

Abstract Influence estimation (IE) and influence maximization (IM) are among the most extensively studied problems in social network analysis. Assuming diffusion (i.e., the spread of diseases) within a social network, IE aims to estimate the influence (i.e., the number of infected nodes) for a given set of seeds; and IM aims to identify a given number of seed nodes that maximize the influence. For both IE and IM, widely-adopted strategies involve repeating Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of diffusion over and over for various seed sets, which is computationally expensive. In this work, we present Monte Carlo Simulator+ (MONSTOR+), an inductive machine learning method designed to estimate the influence of given seed-node sets in social networks under two diffusion models—the independent cascade (IC) model and the linear threshold (LT) model. Due to its inductive nature, MONSTOR+ is applicable to seed-node sets and social networks not included in the training data. MONSTOR+, with its ability to accurately estimate influence through a single forward pass, can greatly accelerate existing IM algorithms by replacing repeated MC simulations. In our experiments, MONSTOR+ exhibits high IE accuracy, achieving 0.955 or higher Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients in unseen real-world social networks. Notably, MONSTOR+ is about 5 to 3000 times faster than repeated MC simulations with similar IE accuracy. For IM problems, IM algorithms equipped with MONSTOR+ are more accurate than state-of-the-art competitors in 81.5 and 77.8% of IM use cases under the IC model and LT model, respectively.

Continual Learning (CL) is the process of learning ceaselessly a sequence of tasks. Most existing CL methods deal with independent data (e.g., images and text) for which many benchmark frameworks and results under standard experimental settings are available. Compared to them, however, CL methods for graph data (graph CL) are relatively underexplored because of (a) the lack of standard experimental settings, especially regarding how to deal with the dependency between instances, (b) the lack of benchmark datasets and scenarios, and (c) high complexity in implementation and evaluation due to the dependency. In this paper, regarding (a) we define four standard incremental settings (task-, class-, domain-, and time-incremental) for node-, link-, and graph-level problems, extending the previously explored scope. Regarding (b), we provide 35 benchmark scenarios based on 24 real-world graphs. Regarding (c), we develop BeGin , an easy and fool-proof framework for graph CL. BeGin is easily extended since it is modularized with reusable modules for data processing, algorithm design, and evaluation. Especially, the evaluation module is completely separated from user code to eliminate potential mistakes. Regarding benchmark results, we cover \(3\times\) more combinations of incremental settings and levels of problems than the latest benchmark. All assets for the benchmark framework are publicly available at https://github.com/ShinhwanKang/BeGin .

Hypergraphs are marked by complex topology, expressing higher-order interactions among multiple nodes with hyperedges, and better capturing the topology is essential for effective representation learning. Recent advances in generative self-supervised learning (SSL) suggest that hypergraph neural networks (HNNs) learned from generative self-supervision have the potential to effectively encode the complex hypergraph topology. Designing a generative SSL strategy for hypergraphs, however, is not straightforward. Questions remain with regard to its generative SSL task, connection to downstream tasks, and empirical properties of learned representations. In light of the promises and challenges, we propose a novel generative SSL strategy for hypergraphs. We first formulate a generative SSL task on hypergraphs, hyperedge filling, and highlight its theoretical connection to node classification. Based on the generative SSL task, we propose a hypergraph SSL method, HYPEBOY. HYPEBOY learns effective general-purpose hypergraph representations, outperforming 15 baseline methods across 11 benchmark datasets. To our knowledge, this is the first study on generative SSL on hypergraphs, and we demonstrate its theoretical and empirical strengths for hypergraph representation learning.

Graph autoencoders (Graph-AEs) learn representations of given graphs by aiming to accurately reconstruct them. A notable application of Graph-AEs is graph-level anomaly detection (GLAD), whose objective is to identify graphs with anomalous topological structures and/or node features compared to the majority of the graph population. Graph-AEs for GLAD regard a graph with a high mean reconstruction error (i.e. mean of errors from all node pairs and/or nodes) as anomalies. Namely, the methods rest on the assumption that they would better reconstruct graphs with similar characteristics to the majority. We, however, report non-trivial counter-examples, a phenomenon we call reconstruction flip, and highlight the limitations of the existing Graph-AE-based GLAD methods. Specifically, we empirically and theoretically investigate when this assumption holds and when it fails. Through our analyses, we further argue that, while the reconstruction errors for a given graph are effective features for GLAD, leveraging the multifaceted summaries of the reconstruction errors, beyond just mean, can further strengthen the features. Thus, we propose a novel and simple GLAD method, named MUSE. The key innovation of MUSE involves taking multifaceted summaries of reconstruction errors as graph features for GLAD. This surprisingly simple method obtains SOTA performance in GLAD, performing best overall among 14 methods across 10 datasets.

Are users of an online social network interested equally in all connections in the network? If not, how can we obtain a summary of the network personalized to specific users? Can we use the summary for approximate query answering? As massive graphs (e.g., online social networks, hyperlink networks, and road networks) have become pervasive, graph compression has gained importance for the efficient processing of such graphs with limited resources. Graph summarization is an extensively-studied lossy compression method. It provides a summary graph where nodes with similar connectivity are merged into supernodes, and a variety of graph queries can be answered approximately from the summary graph. In this work, we introduce a new problem, namely personalized graph summarization, where the objective is to obtain a summary graph where more emphasis is put on connections closer to a given set of target nodes. Then, we propose Pegasus, a linear-time algorithm for the problem. Through experiments on six real-world graphs, we demonstrate that Pegasus is (a) Effective: node-similarity queries for target nodes can be answered significantly more accurately from personalized summary graphs than from non-personalized ones of similar size, (b) Scalable: it summarizes graphs with up to one billion edges, and (c) Applicable to distributed multi-query answering: it successfully replaces graph partitioning for communication-free multi-query processing.