Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Khalid E. Ismail
dblp:317/4941
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Integrated circuit design · 97% Emerging computing paradigms · 3% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Integrated circuit design › emerging device technologies
alternative device structures |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | CMOS scaling into the nanometer regime · Proc. IEEE 1997 |
Integrated circuit design › technology scaling
CMOS scaling |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | CMOS scaling into the nanometer regime · Proc. IEEE 1997 |
Integrated circuit design › semiconductor devices
short-channel effects |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | CMOS scaling into the nanometer regime · Proc. IEEE 1997 |
Integrated circuit design
low-power circuit design |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | CMOS scaling into the nanometer regime · Proc. IEEE 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
modulation doping · 0.0electrical tuning · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | CMOS scaling into the nanometer regimeabstractStarting with a brief review on 0.1-/spl mu/m (100 nm) CMOS status, this paper addresses the key challenges in further scaling of CMOS technology into the nanometer (sub-100 nm) regime in light of fundamental physical effects and practical considerations. Among the issues discussed are: lithography, power supply and threshold voltage, short-channel effect, gate oxide, high-field effects, dopant number fluctuations and interconnect delays. The last part of the paper discusses several alternative or unconventional device structures, including silicon-on-insulator (SOI), SiGe MOSFET's, low-temperature CMOS, and double-gate MOSFET's, which may lead to the outermost limits of silicon scaling. Yuan Taur, Douglas A. Buchanan, David J. Frank, Khalid E. Ismail, Shih-Hsien Lo, George A. Sai-Halasz, Raman G. Viswanathan, Hsing-Jen C. Wann, Shalom J. Wind, H.-S. Philip Wong |
Proc. IEEE | 5 |
| 1991 | Quantum phenomena in field-effect-controlled semiconductor nanostructuresabstractQuantum effects resulting from sub-100 nm features in planar, field-effect-controlled semiconductor structures or devices are discussed, and experimental results are compared with calculations. These devices are based on the GaAs-AlGaAs modulation-doped field-effect transistor (MODFET) and include grating-gate lateral surface superlattices. (LSSLs), grid-gate LSSLs, planar-resonant-tunneling field-effect transistors (PRESTFETs), multiple parallel quantum wires (MPQWs), and arrays of quantum dots (QDs). In contrast to conventional, epitaxially grown vertical quantum structures, planar structures offer the opportunity for electron confinement in three, two, and one dimensions and the flexibility of electrical tuning of quantum effects.> Khalid E. Ismail, Philip F. Bagwell, Terry P. Orlando, Dimitri A. Antoniadis, Henry I. Smith |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |