Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Clarissa Read

dblp:317/6130 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 44% Geometric modeling and processing · 44% Computational photography and imaging · 13%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
weakly supervised object detection
0.812024
Weakly Supervised Virus Capsid Detection with Image-Level Annotations in Electron Microscopy Images · ICLR 2024
Geometric modeling and processing
3d reconstruction
0.612022
Clean Implicit 3D Structure from Noisy 2D STEM Images · CVPR 2022
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising
0.612022
Clean Implicit 3D Structure from Noisy 2D STEM Images · CVPR 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics
electron microscopy image analysis
0.212024
Weakly Supervised Virus Capsid Detection with Image-Level Annotations in Electron Microscopy Images · ICLR 2024
Computational photography and imaging
image formation
0.212022
Clean Implicit 3D Structure from Noisy 2D STEM Images · CVPR 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pseudo-labeling · 1.5knowledge distillation · 1.5implicit neural representation · 0.6differentiable image formation model · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Weakly Supervised Virus Capsid Detection with Image-Level Annotations in Electron Microscopy Images
abstract
Current state-of-the-art methods for object detection rely on annotated bounding boxes of large data sets for training. However, obtaining such annotations is expensive and can require up to hundreds of hours of manual labor. This poses a challenge, especially since such annotations can only be provided by experts, as they require knowledge about the scientific domain. To tackle this challenge, we propose a domain-specific weakly supervised object detection algorithm that only relies on image-level annotations, which are significantly easier to acquire. Our method distills the knowledge of a pre-trained model, on the task of predicting the presence or absence of a virus in an image, to obtain a set of pseudo-labels that can be used to later train a state-of-the-art object detection model. To do so, we use an optimization approach with a shrinking receptive field to extract virus particles directly without specific network architectures. Through a set of extensive studies, we show how the proposed pseudo-labels are easier to obtain, and, more importantly, are able to outperform other existing weak labeling methods, and even ground truth labels, in cases where the time to obtain the annotation is limited.
Hannah Kniesel, Leon Sick, Tristan Payer, Tim Bergner, Kavitha Shaga Devan, Clarissa Read, Paul Walther, Timo Ropinski, Pedro Hermosilla
ICLR6
2022 Clean Implicit 3D Structure from Noisy 2D STEM Images
abstract
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopes (STEMs) acquire 2D images of a 3D sample on the scale of individual cell components. Unfortunately, these 2D images can be too noisy to be fused into a useful 3D structure and facilitating good denoisers is challenging due to the lack of clean-noisy pairs. Additionally, representing detailed 3D structure can be difficult even for clean data when using regular 3D grids. Addressing these two limitations, we suggest a differentiable image formation model for STEM, allowing to learn a joint model of 2D sensor noise in STEM together with an implicit 3D model. We show, that the combination of these models are able to successfully disentangle 3D signal and noise without supervision and outperform at the same time several baselines on synthetic and real data.
Hannah Kniesel, Timo Ropinski, Tim Bergner, Kavitha Shaga Devan, Clarissa Read, Paul Walther, Tobias Ritschel 0001, Pedro Hermosilla
CVPR5