Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alston Lo

dblp:317/6798 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 75% Computational science and engineering · 25%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 60% Trustworthy machine learning · 40%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
0.912025
Stiefel Flow Matching for Moment-Constrained Structure Elucidation · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
riemannian flow matching
0.912025
Stiefel Flow Matching for Moment-Constrained Structure Elucidation · ICLR 2025
Computational science and engineering
computational chemistry
0.912025
Stiefel Flow Matching for Moment-Constrained Structure Elucidation · ICLR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
molecular design
0.912025
Procedural Synthesis of Synthesizable Molecules · ICLR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology
molecular structure determination
0.912025
Stiefel Flow Matching for Moment-Constrained Structure Elucidation · ICLR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › cheminformatics › molecule generation
synthesizable molecule design
0.912025
Procedural Synthesis of Synthesizable Molecules · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › training data attribution
influence function
0.612022
If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question? · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
training data attribution
0.612022
If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question? · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.312025
Stiefel Flow Matching for Moment-Constrained Structure Elucidation · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › multi-objective optimization
evolutionary algorithm
0.312025
Procedural Synthesis of Synthesizable Molecules · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
model behavior analysis
0.212022
If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question? · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

policy learning · 1.7optimal transport · 1.7markov decision process · 1.7markov chain monte carlo · 1.7flow matching · 1.7evolutionary algorithm · 1.7equivariant learning · 1.7proximal bregman response function · 0.6error decomposition · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Stiefel Flow Matching for Moment-Constrained Structure Elucidation
abstract
Molecular structure elucidation is a fundamental step in understanding chemical phenomena, with applications in identifying molecules in natural products, lab syntheses, forensic samples, and the interstellar medium. We consider the task of predicting a molecule's all-atom 3D structure given only its molecular formula and moments of inertia, motivated by the ability of rotational spectroscopy to measure these moments. While existing generative models can conditionally sample 3D structures with approximately correct moments, this soft conditioning fails to leverage the many digits of precision afforded by experimental rotational spectroscopy. To address this, we first show that the space of $n$-atom point clouds with a fixed set of moments of inertia is embedded in the Stiefel manifold $\mathrm{St}(n, 4)$. We then propose Stiefel Flow Matching as a generative model for elucidating 3D structure under exact moment constraints. Additionally, we learn simpler and shorter flows by finding approximate solutions for equivariant optimal transport on the Stiefel manifold. Empirically, enforcing exact moment constraints allows Stiefel Flow Matching to achieve higher success rates and faster sampling than Euclidean diffusion models, even on high-dimensional manifolds corresponding to large molecules in the GEOM dataset.
Austin H. Cheng, Alston Lo, Kin Long Kelvin Lee, Santiago Miret, Alán Aspuru-Guzik
ICLR2
2025 Procedural Synthesis of Synthesizable Molecules
abstract
Designing synthetically accessible molecules and recommending analogs to unsynthesizable molecules are important problems for accelerating molecular discovery. We reconceptualize both problems using ideas from program synthesis. Drawing inspiration from syntax-guided synthesis approaches, we decouple the syntactic skeleton from the semantics of a synthetic tree to create a bilevel framework for reasoning about the combinatorial space of synthesis pathways. Given a molecule we aim to generate analogs for, we iteratively refine its skeletal characteristics via Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations over the space of syntactic skeletons. Given a black-box oracle to optimize, we formulate a joint design space over syntactic templates and molecular descriptors and introduce evolutionary algorithms that optimize both syntactic and semantic dimensions synergistically. Our key insight is that once the syntactic skeleton is set, we can amortize over the search complexity of deriving the program's semantics by training policies to fully utilize the fixed horizon Markov Decision Process imposed by the syntactic template. We demonstrate performance advantages of our bilevel framework for synthesizable analog generation and synthesizable molecule design. Notably, our approach offers the user explicit control over the resources required to perform synthesis and biases the design space towards simpler solutions, making it particularly promising for autonomous synthesis platforms. Supporting code is at https://github.com/shiningsunnyday/SynthesisNet.
Michael Sun, Alston Lo, Jie Chen 0007, Connor W. Coley, Wojciech Matusik
ICLR2
2022 If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?
abstract
Influence functions efficiently estimate the effect of removing a single training data point on a model's learned parameters. While influence estimates align well with leave-one-out retraining for linear models, recent works have shown this alignment is often poor in neural networks. In this work, we investigate the specific factors that cause this discrepancy by decomposing it into five separate terms. We study the contributions of each term on a variety of architectures and datasets and how they vary with factors such as network width and training time. While practical influence function estimates may be a poor match to leave-one-out retraining for nonlinear networks, we show that they are often a good approximation to a different object we term the proximal Bregman response function (PBRF). Since the PBRF can still be used to answer many of the questions motivating influence functions, such as identifying influential or mislabeled examples, our results suggest that current algorithms for influence function estimation give more informative results than previous error analyses would suggest.
Juhan Bae, Nathan Ng 0001, Alston Lo, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Roger B. Grosse
NeurIPS3