Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Pieler

dblp:318/3054 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 62% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 25% Efficient and distributed learning · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 70% Computational science and engineering · 30%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
reasoning model
0.912025
Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › complex reasoning
scientific reasoning
0.912025
Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
cheminformatics
0.912025
ChemPile: A 250 GB Diverse and Curated Dataset for Chemical Foundation Models · NeurIPS 2025
Computational science and engineering
chemistry
0.912025
Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › cheminformatics › molecule generation
molecular structure generation
0.912025
Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
data selection for fine-tuning
0.712023
Few-shot Adaptation Works with UnpredicTable Data · ACL (1) 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › few-shot learning
few-shot adaptation
0.712023
Few-shot Adaptation Works with UnpredicTable Data · ACL (1) 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning
0.712023
Few-shot Adaptation Works with UnpredicTable Data · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning
0.712023
Few-shot Adaptation Works with UnpredicTable Data · ACL (1) 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › cheminformatics
molecular representation
0.312025
ChemPile: A 250 GB Diverse and Curated Dataset for Chemical Foundation Models · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.7post-training · 1.7task extraction from internet tables · 0.7fine-tuning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ChemPile: A 250 GB Diverse and Curated Dataset for Chemical Foundation Models
abstract
Foundation models have shown remarkable success across scientific domains, yet their impact in chemistry remains limited due to the absence of diverse, large-scale, high-quality datasets that reflect the field's multifaceted nature. We present the ChemPile, an open dataset containing over 75 billion tokens of curated chemical data, specifically built for training and evaluating general-purpose models in the chemical sciences. The dataset mirrors the human learning journey through chemistry---from educational foundations to specialized expertise---spanning multiple modalities and content types including structured data in diverse chemical representations (SMILES, SELFIES, IUPAC names, InChI, molecular renderings), scientific and educational text, executable code, and chemical images. ChemPile integrates foundational knowledge (textbooks, lecture notes), specialized expertise (scientific articles and language-interfaced data), visual understanding (molecular structures, diagrams), and advanced reasoning (problem-solving traces and code)---mirroring how human chemists develop expertise through diverse learning materials and experiences. Constructed through hundreds of hours of expert curation, the ChemPile captures both foundational concepts and domain-specific complexity. We provide standardized training, validation, and test splits, enabling robust benchmarking. ChemPile is openly released via HuggingFace with a consistent API, permissive license, and detailed documentation. We hope the ChemPile will serve as a catalyst for chemical AI, enabling the development of the next generation of chemical foundation models.
Adrian Mirza, Nawaf Alampara, Martiño Ríos-García, Mohamed Abdelalim, Jack Butler, Bethany Connolly, Tunca Dogan, Marianna Nezhurina, Bünyamin Sen, Santosh Tirunagari, Mark Worrall, Adamo Young, Philippe Schwaller, Michael Pieler, Kevin Maik Jablonka
NeurIPS14
2025 Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry
abstract
Reasoning models are large language models that use extra "thought tokens" before answering, providing both higher accuracy and explicit reasoning for their response. A major question has been whether language model reasoning generalizes beyond mathematics, programming, and logic, where most previous work has focused. We demonstrate that reasoning models can be post-trained in scientific domains without additional domain pretraining, and require substantially less data compared to contemporary domain-specific models. We report ether0, a 24B parameter LLM (based on Mistral-Small-24B) that can reason in natural language and respond with chemical structures. This reasoning model was trained with reinforcement learning on 577,790 experimentally-grounded chemistry tasks involving synthesized organic molecules. Our model outperforms all previous general-purpose chemistry models, frontier models, and humans, and is more data efficient relative to specialized models. We anticipate that this method can be applied to train highly data-efficient language models specialized for predictive and generative tasks across a wide variety of scientific domains.
Siddharth Narayanan, James D. Braza, Ryan-Rhys Griffiths, Albert Bou, Geemi P. Wellawatte, Mayk Caldas Ramos, Ludovico Mitchener, Michael Pieler, Samuel G. Rodriques, Andrew D. White
NeurIPS8
2023 Few-shot Adaptation Works with UnpredicTable Data
abstract
Prior work on language models (LMs) shows that training on a large number of diverse tasks improves few-shot learning (FSL) performance on new tasks.We take this to the extreme, automatically extracting 413,299 tasks from internet tables -orders of magnitude more than the next-largest public datasets.Finetuning on the resulting dataset leads to improved FSL performance on Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, but not proportionally to dataset scale.In fact, we find that narrow subsets of our dataset sometimes outperform more diverse datasets.For example, finetuning on software documentation from support.google.com raises FSL performance by a mean of +7.5% on 52 downstream tasks, which beats training on 40 humancurated NLP datasets (+6.7%).Finetuning on various narrow datasets leads to similar broad improvements across test tasks, suggesting that the gains are not from domain adaptation but adapting to FSL in general.We do not observe clear patterns between the datasets that lead to FSL gains, leaving open questions about why certain data helps with FSL.
Jun Shern Chan, Michael Pieler, Jonathan Jao, Jérémy Scheurer, Ethan Perez
ACL (1)2