VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kuba Perlin
dblp:318/3078
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 50% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation › neural program synthesis
LLM-based program synthesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal Behavior · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
backpropagation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interlocking Backpropagation: Improving depthwise model-parallelism · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interlocking Backpropagation: Improving depthwise model-parallelism · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
local learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interlocking Backpropagation: Improving depthwise model-parallelism · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
model parallelism |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interlocking Backpropagation: Improving depthwise model-parallelism · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › computational cognitive science
cognitive modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal Behavior · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.7evolutionary algorithm · 1.7local learning · 0.6interlocking backpropagation · 0.6backpropagation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal BehaviorabstractSymbolic models play a key role in cognitive science, expressing computationally precise hypotheses about how the brain implements a cognitive process. Identifying an appropriate model typically requires a great deal of effort and ingenuity on the part of a human scientist.
Here, we adapt FunSearch (Romera-Paredes et al. 2024), a recently developed tool that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) in an evolutionary algorithm, to automatically discover symbolic cognitive models that accurately capture human and animal behavior.
We consider datasets from three species performing a classic reward-learning task that has been the focus of substantial modeling effort, and find that the discovered programs outperform state-of-the-art cognitive models for each.
The discovered programs can readily be interpreted as hypotheses about human and animal cognition, instantiating interpretable symbolic learning and decision-making algorithms. Broadly, these results demonstrate the viability of using LLM-powered program synthesis to propose novel scientific hypotheses regarding mechanisms of human and animal cognition. Pablo Samuel Castro, Nenad Tomasev, Ankit Anand, Navodita Sharma, Rishika Mohanta, Aparna Dev, Kuba Perlin, Siddhant Jain, Kyle Levin, Noémi Élteto, Will Dabney, Alexander Novikov 0001, Glenn C. Turner, Maria K. Eckstein, Nathaniel D. Daw, Kevin J. Miller, Kimberly L. Stachenfeld |
ICML | 7 |
| 2022 | Interlocking Backpropagation: Improving depthwise model-parallelismabstractThe number of parameters in state of the art neural networks has drastically increased in recent years. This surge of interest in large scale neural networks has motivated the development of new distributed training strategies enabling such models. One such strategy is model-parallel distributed training. Unfortunately, model-parallelism can suffer from poor resource utilisation, which leads to wasted resources. In this work, we improve upon recent developments in an idealised model-parallel optimisation setting: local learning. Motivated by poor resource utilisation in the global setting and poor task performance in the local setting, we introduce a class of intermediary strategies between local and global learning referred to as interlocking backpropagation. These strategies preserve many of the compute-efficiency advantages of local optimisation, while recovering much of the task performance achieved by global optimisation. We assess our strategies on both image classification ResNets and Transformer language models, finding that our strategy consistently out-performs local learning in terms of task performance, and out-performs global learning in training efficiency. Aidan N. Gomez, Oscar Key, Kuba Perlin, Stephen Gou, Nicholas Frosst, Jeffrey Dean, Yarin Gal |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |