Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mengda Huang
dblp:319/0864
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 43% Reinforcement learning · 30% Graph learning · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
constrained policy optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Gradient-Adaptive Pareto Optimization for Constrained Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
constrained reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Gradient-Adaptive Pareto Optimization for Constrained Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
multi-objective optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Gradient-Adaptive Pareto Optimization for Constrained Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › multi-objective optimization
pareto optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Gradient-Adaptive Pareto Optimization for Constrained Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization › metric optimization
AUC maximization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | AUC-oriented Graph Neural Network for Fraud Detection · WWW 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | AUC-oriented Graph Neural Network for Fraud Detection · WWW 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
imbalanced learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | AUC-oriented Graph Neural Network for Fraud Detection · WWW 2022 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | AUC-oriented Graph Neural Network for Fraud Detection · WWW 2022 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
fraud detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | AUC-oriented Graph Neural Network for Fraud Detection · WWW 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic gradient · 1.1reinforcement learning · 1.1edge pruning · 1.1gradient rebalancing · 0.7gradient perturbation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Gradient-Adaptive Pareto Optimization for Constrained Reinforcement LearningabstractConstrained Reinforcement Learning (CRL) burgeons broad interest in recent years, which pursues maximizing long-term returns while constraining costs. Although CRL can be cast as a multi-objective optimization problem, it is still facing the key challenge that gradient-based Pareto optimization methods tend to stick to known Pareto-optimal solutions even when they yield poor returns (e.g., the safest self-driving car that never moves) or violate the constraints (e.g., the record-breaking racer that crashes the car). In this paper, we propose Gradient-adaptive Constrained Policy Optimization (GCPO for short), a novel Pareto optimization method for CRL with two adaptive gradient recalibration techniques. First, to find Pareto-optimal solutions with balanced performance over all targets, we propose gradient rebalancing which forces the agent to improve more on under-optimized objectives at every policy iteration. Second, to guarantee that the cost constraints are satisfied, we propose gradient perturbation that can temporarily sacrifice the returns for costs. Experiments on the SafetyGym benchmarks show that our method consistently outperforms previous CRL methods in reward while satisfying the constraints. Zixian Zhou, Mengda Huang, Feiyang Pan, Jia He 0001, Xiang Ao 0001, Dandan Tu, Qing He 0003 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2022 | AUC-oriented Graph Neural Network for Fraud DetectionabstractThough Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been successful for fraud detection tasks, they suffer from imbalanced labels due to limited fraud compared to the overall userbase. This paper attempts to resolve this label-imbalance problem for GNNs by maximizing the AUC (Area Under ROC Curve) metric since it is unbiased with label distribution. However, maximizing AUC on GNN for fraud detection tasks is intractable due to the potential polluted topological structure caused by intentional noisy edges generated by fraudsters. To alleviate this problem, we propose to decouple the AUC maximization process on GNN into a classifier parameter searching and an edge pruning policy searching, respectively. We propose a model named AO-GNN (Short for AUC-oriented GNN), to achieve AUC maximization on GNN under the aforementioned framework. In the proposed model, an AUC-oriented stochastic gradient is applied for classifier parameter searching, and an AUC-oriented reinforcement learning module supervised by a surrogate reward of AUC is devised for edge pruning policy searching. Experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed AO-GNN patently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in not only AUC but also other general metrics, e.g. F1-macro, G-means. Mengda Huang, Yang Liu 0200, Xiang Ao 0001, Kuan Li, Jianfeng Chi, Jinghua Feng, Hao Yang 0037, Qing He 0003 |
WWW | 1 |