Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jinhao Pan

dblp:319/1151 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-1574-6376ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias evaluation
1.012026
Bias Association Discovery Framework for Open-Ended LLM Generations · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias in language models
1.012026
Bias Association Discovery Framework for Open-Ended LLM Generations · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
1.012026
Bias Association Discovery Framework for Open-Ended LLM Generations · AAAI 2026
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.912025
Combating Heterogeneous Model Biases in Recommendations via Boosting · WSDM 2025
Recommender systems
debiased recommendation
0.912025
Combating Heterogeneous Model Biases in Recommendations via Boosting · WSDM 2025
Recommender systems
fairness and bias
0.912025
Combating Heterogeneous Model Biases in Recommendations via Boosting · WSDM 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bias association discovery · 1.0ensemble learning · 0.9boosting · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Bias Association Discovery Framework for Open-Ended LLM Generations
abstract
Social biases embedded in Large Language Models (LLMs) raise critical concerns, resulting in representational harms -- unfair or distorted portrayals of demographic groups -- that may be expressed in subtle ways through generated language. Existing evaluation methods often depend on predefined identity-concept associations, limiting their ability to surface new or unexpected forms of bias. In this work, we present the Bias Association Discovery Framework (BADF), a systematic approach for extracting both known and previously unrecognized associations between demographic identities and descriptive concepts from open-ended LLM outputs. Through comprehensive experiments spanning multiple models and diverse real-world contexts, BADF enables robust mapping and analysis of the varied concepts that characterize demographic identities. Our findings advance the understanding of biases in open-ended generation and provide a scalable tool for identifying and analyzing bias associations in LLMs.
Jinhao Pan, Chahat Raj, Ziwei Zhu 0001
AAAI1
2025 Combating Heterogeneous Model Biases in Recommendations via Boosting
abstract
Collaborative Filtering (CF) based recommenders often exhibit model biases, delivering strong recommendation utility to certain users or items at the expense of others. Prior research approaches these biases as isolated and standalone issues, ignoring their interconnected nature and developing separate methods, thereby compromising the specialized debiasing efforts. Thus, we introduce a boosting-based framework designed to alleviate a broad spectrum of biases. This framework employs a series of sub-models, each tailored for different user and item subgroups. Theoretically, our model ensures an exponentially decreasing upper bound on the training loss across all user and item types with increasing boosting iterations. Extensive experiments demonstrate its superior debiasing capabilities against state-of-the-art methods across four model bias types. Appendix, data and code are available at https://github.com/JP-25/CFBoost
Jinhao Pan, James Caverlee, Ziwei Zhu 0001
WSDM1
2024 Countering Mainstream Bias via End-to-End Adaptive Local Learning
Jinhao Pan, Ziwei Zhu 0001, Jianling Wang, Allen Lin, James Caverlee
ECIR (5)1
2022 A Practical Data Authentication Scheme for Unattended Wireless Sensor Networks Using Physically Unclonable Functions
Pingchuan Wang, Lupeng Zhang, Jinhao Pan, Fengqi Li
WASA (1)3