VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qiyuan Chen 0003
dblp:319/2575-3
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-2315-4972ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Efficient and distributed learning · 17% Reinforcement learning · 13% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning What Matters: Dynamic Dimension Selection and Aggregation for Interpretable Vision-Language Reward Modeling · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable reinforcement learning
reward model interpretability |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning What Matters: Dynamic Dimension Selection and Aggregation for Interpretable Vision-Language Reward Modeling · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Icon2: Aligning Large Language Models Using Self-Synthetic Preference Data via Inherent Regulation · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
preference-based reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Icon2: Aligning Large Language Models Using Self-Synthetic Preference Data via Inherent Regulation · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample Selection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
representative sampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample Selection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
sample selection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample Selection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample Selection · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › synthetic data generation
tabular data augmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Can a Deep Learning Model be a Sure Bet for Tabular Prediction? · KDD 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
tabular prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Can a Deep Learning Model be a Sure Bet for Tabular Prediction? · KDD 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Learning What Matters: Dynamic Dimension Selection and Aggregation for Interpretable Vision-Language Reward Modeling · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Can a Deep Learning Model be a Sure Bet for Tabular Prediction? · KDD 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language reward modeling · 1.0dynamic dimension selection · 1.0self-synthetic preference data · 0.9semi-permeable attention · 0.8maximum mean discrepancy · 0.8frank-wolfe algorithm · 0.8data augmentation · 0.8attentive feedforward network · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Learning What Matters: Dynamic Dimension Selection and Aggregation for Interpretable Vision-Language Reward ModelingabstractQiyuan Chen, Hongsen Huang, Jiahe Chen, Qian Shao, Jintai Chen, Hongxia Xu, Renjie Hua, Ren Chuan, Jian Wu. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Qiyuan Chen 0003, Hongsen Huang, Qian Shao, Jintai Chen, Renjie Hua, Ren Chuan, Jian Wu 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Icon2: Aligning Large Language Models Using Self-Synthetic Preference Data via Inherent RegulationabstractQiyuan Chen, Hongsen Huang, Qian Shao, Jiahe Chen, Jintai Chen, Hongxia Xu, Renjie Hua, Ren Chuan, Jian Wu. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. Qiyuan Chen 0003, Hongsen Huang, Qian Shao, Jintai Chen, Renjie Hua, Ren Chuan, Jian Wu 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2025 | Alleviating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models with Active Retrieval AugmentationabstractDespite the remarkable ability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) in image comprehension, these models frequently generate plausible yet factually incorrect responses, a phenomenon known as hallucination. Recently, in Large Language Models (LLMs), augmenting LLMs by retrieving information from external knowledge resources has been proven as a promising solution to mitigate hallucinations. However, the retrieval augmentation in LVLM significantly lags behind the widespread applications of LVLM. Moreover, when transferred to augmenting LVLMs, sometimes the hallucination degree of the model is even exacerbated. Motivated by the research gap and counter-intuitive phenomenon, we introduce a novel framework, the Active Retrieval-Augmented (ARA) LVLM, specifically designed to address hallucinations by incorporating three critical dimensions: (i) dissecting the retrieval targets based on the inherent hierarchical structures of images; (ii) pinpointing the most effective retrieval methods and filtering out the reliable retrieval results; and (iii) timing the retrieval process to coincide with episodes of low certainty, while circumventing unnecessary retrieval during periods of high certainty. To assess the capability of our proposed ARA model in reducing hallucination, we employ three widely used LVLM models (LLaVA-1.5, Qwen-VL, and mPLUG-Owl2) across four benchmarks. Our empirical observations suggest that by utilizing fitting retrieval mechanisms and timing the retrieval judiciously, we can effectively mitigate the hallucination problem. We hope that this study can provide deeper insights into how to adapt the retrieval augmentation to LVLMs for reducing hallucinations with more effective retrieval and minimal retrieval occurrences. Xiaoye Qu, Qiyuan Chen 0003, Wei Wei 0002, Jiashuo Sun, Daizong Liu, Jianfeng Dong |
ACM Trans. Multim. Comput. Commun. Appl. | 2 |
| 2024 | Can a Deep Learning Model be a Sure Bet for Tabular Prediction?abstractData organized in tabular format is ubiquitous in real-world applications, and users often craft tables with biased feature definitions and flexibly set prediction targets of their interests. Thus, a rapid development of a robust, effective, dataset-versatile, user-friendly tabular prediction approach is highly desired. While Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDTs) and existing deep neural networks (DNNs) have been extensively utilized by professional users, they present several challenges for casual users, particularly: (i) the dilemma of model selection due to their different dataset preferences, and (ii) the need for heavy hyperparameter searching, failing which their performances are deemed inadequate. In this paper, we delve into this question: Can we develop a deep learning model that serves as a sure bet solution for a wide range of tabular prediction tasks, while also being user-friendly for casual users? We delve into three key drawbacks of deep tabular models, encompassing: (P1) lack of rotational variance property, (P2) large data demand, and (P3) over-smooth solution. We propose ExcelFormer, addressing these challenges through a semi-permeable attention module that effectively constrains the influence of less informative features to break the DNNs' rotational invariance property (for P1), data augmentation approaches tailored for tabular data (for P2), and attentive feedforward network to boost the model fitting capability (for P3). These designs collectively make ExcelFormer a sure bet solution for diverse tabular datasets. Extensive and stratified experiments conducted on real-world datasets demonstrate that our model outperforms previous approaches across diverse tabular data prediction tasks, and this framework can be friendly to casual users, offering ease of use without the heavy hyperparameter tuning. The codes are available at https://github.com/whatashot/excelformer. Jintai Chen, Jiahuan Yan, Qiyuan Chen 0003, Danny Ziyi Chen, Jian Wu 0001, Jimeng Sun 0001 |
KDD | 3 |
| 2024 | Mind's Mirror: Distilling Self-Evaluation Capability and Comprehensive Thinking from Large Language ModelsabstractWeize Liu, Guocong Li, Kai Zhang, Bang Du, Qiyuan Chen, Xuming Hu, Hongxia Xu, Jintai Chen, Jian Wu. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Weize Liu, Guocong Li, Kai Zhang 0053, Bang Du, Qiyuan Chen 0003, Xuming Hu, Jintai Chen, Jian Wu 0001 |
NAACL-HLT | 5 |
| 2024 | Enhancing Semi-Supervised Learning via Representative and Diverse Sample SelectionabstractSemi-Supervised Learning (SSL) has become a preferred paradigm in many deep learning tasks, which reduces the need for human labor. Previous studies primarily focus on effectively utilising the labelled and unlabeled data to improve performance. However, we observe that how to select samples for labelling also significantly impacts performance, particularly under extremely low-budget settings. The sample selection task in SSL has been under-explored for a long time. To fill in this gap, we propose a Representative and Diverse Sample Selection approach (RDSS). By adopting a modified Frank-Wolfe algorithm to minimise a novel criterion $\alpha$-Maximum Mean Discrepancy ($\alpha$-MMD), RDSS samples a representative and diverse subset for annotation from the unlabeled data. We demonstrate that minimizing $\alpha$-MMD enhances the generalization ability of low-budget learning. Experimental results show that RDSS consistently improves the performance of several popular SSL frameworks and outperforms the state-of-the-art sample selection approaches used in Active Learning (AL) and Semi-Supervised Active Learning (SSAL), even with constrained annotation budgets. Our code is available at [RDSS](https://github.com/YanhuiAILab/RDSS). Qian Shao, Jiangrui Kang, Qiyuan Chen 0003, Zepeng Li 0002, Yiwen Cao, Jiajuan Liang, Jian Wu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |