Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Etienne Maheux
dblp:319/5233
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › hierarchical modeling
mixed-effects model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Riemannian metric for disease progression modeling · NeurIPS 2021 |
Medical and health informatics
disease progression modeling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Riemannian metric for disease progression modeling · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
riemannian geometry · 1.0reproducing kernel hilbert space · 1.0radial basis functions · 1.0diffeomorphism estimation · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Learning Riemannian metric for disease progression modelingabstractLinear mixed-effect models provide a natural baseline for estimating disease progression using longitudinal data. They provide interpretable models at the cost of modeling assumptions on the progression profiles and their variability across subjects. A significant improvement is to embed the data in a Riemannian manifold and learn patient-specific trajectories distributed around a central geodesic. A few interpretable parameters characterize subject trajectories at the cost of a prior choice of the metric, which determines the shape of the trajectories. We extend this approach by learning the metric from the data allowing more flexibility while keeping the interpretability. Specifically, we learn the metric as the push-forward of the Euclidean metric by a diffeomorphism. This diffeomorphism is estimated iteratively as the composition of radial basis functions belonging to a reproducible kernel Hilbert space. The metric update allows us to improve the forecasting of imaging and clinical biomarkers in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. Our results compare favorably to the 56 methods benchmarked in the TADPOLE challenge. Samuel Gruffaz, Pierre-Emmanuel Poulet, Etienne Maheux, Bruno Jedynak, Stanley Durrleman |
NeurIPS | 3 |