Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abel Jansma
dblp:319/9470
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Decomposing Interventional Causality into Synergistic, Redundant, and Unique Components · NeurIPS 2025 |
Information theory › information measures › information decomposition
partial information decomposition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Decomposing Interventional Causality into Synergistic, Redundant, and Unique Components · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
redundancy lattice · 1.7möbius inversion · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Decomposing Interventional Causality into Synergistic, Redundant, and Unique ComponentsabstractWe introduce a novel framework for decomposing interventional causal effects into synergistic, redundant, and unique components, building on the intuition of Partial Information Decomposition (PID) and the principle of Möbius inversion. While recent work has explored a similar decomposition of an observational measure, we argue that a proper causal decomposition must be interventional in nature. We develop a mathematical approach that systematically quantifies how causal power is distributed among variables in a system, using a recently derived closed-form expression for the Möbius function of the redundancy lattice. The formalism is then illustrated by decomposing the causal power in logic gates, cellular automata, and chemical reaction networks. Our results reveal how the distribution of causal power can be context- and parameter-dependent. The decomposition provides new insights into complex systems by revealing how causal influences are shared and combined among multiple variables, with potential applications ranging from attribution of responsibility in legal or AI systems, to the analysis of biological networks or climate models. Abel Jansma |
NeurIPS | 1 |