Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amir Maleki
dblp:32/1112
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Motion planning and robot control · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › verification
formal verification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | OVERT: An Algorithm for Safety Verification of Neural Network Control Policies for Nonlinear Systems · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network verification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | OVERT: An Algorithm for Safety Verification of Neural Network Control Policies for Nonlinear Systems · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
reachability analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | OVERT: An Algorithm for Safety Verification of Neural Network Control Policies for Nonlinear Systems · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
piecewise linear bounds · 0.6ReLU network verification · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | OVERT: An Algorithm for Safety Verification of Neural Network Control Policies for Nonlinear SystemsabstractDeep learning methods can be used to produce control policies, but certifying their safety is challenging. The resulting networks are nonlinear and often very large. In response to this challenge, we present OVERT: a sound algorithm for safety verification of nonlinear discrete-time closed loop dynamical systems with neural network control policies. The novelty of OVERT lies in combining ideas from the classical formal methods literature with ideas from the newer neural network verification literature. The central concept of OVERT is to abstract nonlinear functions with a set of optimally tight piecewise linear bounds. Such piecewise linear bounds are designed for seamless integration into ReLU neural network verification tools. OVERT can be used to prove bounded-time safety properties by either computing reachable sets or solving feasibility queries directly. We demonstrate various examples of safety verification for several classical benchmark examples. OVERT compares favorably to existing methods both in computation time and in tightness of the reachable set. Chelsea Sidrane, Amir Maleki, Ahmed Irfan, Mykel J. Kochenderfer |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |