VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexey Nekrasov 0001
dblp:32/1352-1
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7230-0294ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
3D vision · 32% Time series and sequential data · 16% Trustworthy machine learning · 16% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | OCCUQ: Exploring Efficient Uncertainty Quantification for 3D Occupancy Prediction · ICRA 2025 Spotting the Unexpected (STU): A 3D LiDAR Dataset for Anomaly Segmentation in Autonomous Driving · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
anomaly segmentation |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | OoDIS: Anomaly Instance Segmentation and Detection Benchmark · ICRA 2025 Spotting the Unexpected (STU): A 3D LiDAR Dataset for Anomaly Segmentation in Autonomous Driving · CVPR 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Spotting the Unexpected (STU): A 3D LiDAR Dataset for Anomaly Segmentation in Autonomous Driving · CVPR 2025 OoDIS: Anomaly Instance Segmentation and Detection Benchmark · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
3d semantic segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Spotting the Unexpected (STU): A 3D LiDAR Dataset for Anomaly Segmentation in Autonomous Driving · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
epistemic uncertainty |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | OCCUQ: Exploring Efficient Uncertainty Quantification for 3D Occupancy Prediction · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › robust object detection
out-of-distribution object detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | OoDIS: Anomaly Instance Segmentation and Detection Benchmark · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
semantic scene completion |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | OCCUQ: Exploring Efficient Uncertainty Quantification for 3D Occupancy Prediction · ICRA 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | OCCUQ: Exploring Efficient Uncertainty Quantification for 3D Occupancy Prediction · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › panoptic segmentation
4d panoptic segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Mask4Former: Mask Transformer for 4D Panoptic Segmentation · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud processing
LiDAR point cloud processing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Mask4Former: Mask Transformer for 4D Panoptic Segmentation · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
multimodal perception |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Spotting the Unexpected (STU): A 3D LiDAR Dataset for Anomaly Segmentation in Autonomous Driving · CVPR 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception › perception robustness
sensor corruption robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | OCCUQ: Exploring Efficient Uncertainty Quantification for 3D Occupancy Prediction · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › open-world object detection
unknown object detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | OoDIS: Anomaly Instance Segmentation and Detection Benchmark · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep ensembles · 0.9confidence calibration · 0.9camera fusion · 0.9benchmark evaluation · 0.9MC-dropout · 0.9LiDAR · 0.9transformer · 0.8spatio-temporal instance queries · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Spotting the Unexpected (STU): A 3D LiDAR Dataset for Anomaly Segmentation in Autonomous DrivingabstractTo operate safely, autonomous vehicles (AVs) need to detect and handle unexpected objects or anomalies on the road. While significant research exists for anomaly detection and segmentation in 2D, research progress in 3D is underexplored. Existing datasets lack high-quality multimodal data that are typically found in AVs. This paper presents a novel dataset for anomaly segmentation in driving scenarios. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first publicly available dataset focused on road anomaly segmentation with dense 3D semantic labeling, incorporating both LiDAR and camera data, as well as sequential information to enable anomaly detection across various ranges. This capability is critical for the safe navigation of autonomous vehicles. We adapted and evaluated several baseline models for 3D segmentation, highlighting the challenges of 3D anomaly detection in driving environments. Our dataset and evaluation code will be openly available, facilitating the testing and performance comparison of different approaches. Alexey Nekrasov 0001, Malcolm Burdorf, Stewart Worrall 0002, Bastian Leibe, Julie Stephany Berrio |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2025 | OCCUQ: Exploring Efficient Uncertainty Quantification for 3D Occupancy PredictionabstractAutonomous driving has the potential to significantly enhance productivity and provide numerous societal benefits. Ensuring robustness in these safety-critical systems is essential, particularly when vehicles must navigate adverse weather conditions and sensor corruptions that may not have been encountered during training. Current methods often overlook uncertainties arising from adversarial conditions or distributional shifts, limiting their real-world applicability. We propose an efficient adaptation of an uncertainty estimation technique for 3D occupancy prediction. Our method dynamically calibrates model confidence using epistemic uncertainty estimates. Our evaluation under various camera corruption scenarios, such as fog or missing cameras, demonstrates that our approach effectively quantifies epistemic uncertainty by assigning higher uncertainty values to unseen data. We introduce region-specific corruptions to simulate defects affecting only a single camera and validate our findings through both scene-level and region-level assessments. Our results show superior performance in Out-of-Distribution (OoD) detection and confidence calibration compared to common baselines such as Deep Ensembles and MC-Dropout. Our approach consistently demonstrates reliable uncertainty measures, indicating its potential for enhancing the robustness of autonomous driving systems in real-world scenarios. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/ika-rwth-aachen/OCCUQ. Severin Heidrich, Till Beemelmanns, Alexey Nekrasov 0001, Bastian Leibe, Lutz Eckstein |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2025 | OoDIS: Anomaly Instance Segmentation and Detection BenchmarkabstractSafe navigation of self-driving cars and robots requires a precise understanding of their environment. Training data for perception systems cannot cover the wide variety of objects that may appear during deployment. Thus, reliable identification of unknown objects, such as wild animals and untypical obstacles, is critical due to their potential to cause serious accidents. Significant progress in semantic segmentation of anomalies has been facilitated by the availability of out-of-distribution (OOD) benchmarks. However, a comprehensive understanding of scene dynamics requires the segmentation of individual objects, and thus the segmentation of instances is essential. Development in this area has been lagging, largely due to the lack of dedicated benchmarks. The situation is similar in object detection. While there is interest in detecting and potentially tracking every anomalous object, the availability of dedicated benchmarks is clearly limited. To address this gap, this work extends some commonly used anomaly segmentation benchmarks to include the instance segmentation and object detection tasks. Our evaluation of anomaly instance segmentation and object detection methods shows that both of these challenges remain unsolved problems. We provide a competition and benchmark website under https://vision.rwth-aachen.de/oodis. Alexey Nekrasov 0001, Miriam Schäfers, Alexander Hermans, Bastian Leibe, Matthias Rottmann |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2024 | Mask4Former: Mask Transformer for 4D Panoptic SegmentationabstractAccurately perceiving and tracking instances over time is essential for the decision-making processes of autonomous agents interacting safely in dynamic environments. With this intention, we propose Mask4Former for the challenging task of 4D panoptic segmentation of LiDAR point clouds. Mask4Former is the first transformer-based approach unifying semantic instance segmentation and tracking of sparse and irregular sequences of 3D point clouds into a single joint model. Our model directly predicts semantic instances and their temporal associations without relying on hand-crafted non-learned association strategies such as probabilistic clustering or voting-based center prediction. Instead, Mask4Former introduces spatio-temporal instance queries that encode the semantic and geometric properties of each semantic tracklet in the sequence. In an in-depth study, we find that promoting spatially compact instance predictions is critical as spatiotemporal instance queries tend to merge multiple semantically similar instances, even if they are spatially distant. To this end, we regress 6-DOF bounding box parameters from spatiotemporal instance queries, which are used as an auxiliary task to foster spatially compact predictions. Mask4Former achieves a new state-of-the-art on the SemanticKITTI test set with a score of 68.4 LSTQ. Kadir Yilmaz, Jonas Schult, Alexey Nekrasov 0001, Bastian Leibe |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2021 | Mix3D: Out-of-Context Data Augmentation for 3D ScenesabstractWe present Mix3D, a data augmentation technique for segmenting large-scale 3D scenes. Since scene context helps reasoning about object semantics, current works focus on models with large capacity and receptive fields that can fully capture the global context of an input 3D scene. However, strong contextual priors can have detrimental implications like mistaking a pedestrian crossing the street for a car. In this work, we focus on the importance of balancing global scene context and local geometry, with the goal of generalizing beyond the contextual priors in the training set. In particular, we propose a “mixing” technique which creates new training samples by combining two augmented scenes. By doing so, object instances are implicitly placed into novel out-of-context environments, therefore making it harder for models to rely on scene context alone, and instead infer semantics from local structure as well. We perform detailed analysis to understand the importance of global context, local structures and the effect of mixing scenes. In experiments, we show that models trained with Mix3D profit from a significant performance boost on indoor (ScanNet, S3DIS) and outdoor datasets (SemanticKITTI). Mix3D can be trivially used with any existing method, e.g., trained with Mix3D, MinkowskiNet outperforms all prior state-of-the-art methods by a significant margin on the ScanNet test benchmark (78.1% mIoU). Code is available at: https://nekrasov.dev/mix3d/ Alexey Nekrasov 0001, Jonas Schult, Or Litany, Bastian Leibe, Francis Engelmann |
3DV | 1 |