Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Courage

dblp:32/181 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.011998
A Self-Scaling and Self-Configuring Benchmark for Web Servers (Extended Abstract) · SIGMETRICS 1998
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking
web server benchmarking
0.011998
A Self-Scaling and Self-Configuring Benchmark for Web Servers (Extended Abstract) · SIGMETRICS 1998
Performance modeling and evaluation › workload characterization › commercial workloads
web server workload
0.011998
A Self-Scaling and Self-Configuring Benchmark for Web Servers (Extended Abstract) · SIGMETRICS 1998
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.011998
A Self-Scaling and Self-Configuring Benchmark for Web Servers (Extended Abstract) · SIGMETRICS 1998
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 A Self-Scaling and Self-Configuring Benchmark for Web Servers (Extended Abstract)
abstract
World Wide Web clients and servers have become some of the most important applications in our computing base, and we need realistic and meaningful ways of measuring their performance. Current server benchmarks do not capture the wide variation that we see in servers and are not accurate in their characterization of web traffic. In this paper, we present a self-configuring, scalable benchmark that generates a server benchmark load based on actual server loads. In contrast to other web benchmarks, our benchmark focuses on request latency instead of focusing exclusively on throughput sensitive metrics. We present our new benchmark hBench:Web, and demonstrate how it accurately models the load of an actual server. The benchmark can also be used to assess how continued growth or changes in the workload will affect future performance. Using existing log histories, we now that these predictions are sufficiently realistic to provide insight into tomorrow's Web performance.
Stephen Manley, Margo I. Seltzer, Michael Courage
SIGMETRICS3