Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard G. Hayward
dblp:32/5728
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering › software size measurement
function point analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Technology Dependence in Function Point Analysis: A Case Study and Critical Review · ICSE 1989 |
Empirical software engineering
software metrics |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Technology Dependence in Function Point Analysis: A Case Study and Critical Review · ICSE 1989 |
Empirical software engineering › software metrics
productivity measurement |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Technology Dependence in Function Point Analysis: A Case Study and Critical Review · ICSE 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
case study · 0.0calibration model · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | Technology Dependence in Function Point Analysis: A Case Study and Critical ReviewabstractBecause Function Point Analysis (FPA) has now been in use for a decade, and in spite of its increasing uouularitv has met with some recent criticisms, it is time to &view how appropriate it still is for todav's technoloaies.A critical review of the FPA approach exam&es in part&lar the pioneering and continuing work of Albrecht and more recent work by Symons.Technological dependencies in FPA-type metrics are identified and a general model for deriving a new FPA-type metric for a new software technology is given.A model for the calibration of FPA-type metrics for new technologies in terms of a reference technology is also presented.Such calibration is essential for comparative productivity studies.The role of module estimation in exposing parts of the 'anatomy' of the FPA approach is investigated.The derivation and calibration models are applied to a significant case study in which a new FPA-type metric suited to a particular software development technology is derived, calibrated and compared with other published versions of FPA metrics. June M. Verner, Graham Tate, Richard G. Hayward |
ICSE | 4 |