Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wolfgang H. Wohlleber

dblp:32/6152 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1979
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data models and query languages · 50% Database theory · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data models and query languages
data abstraction
0.011979
Data Abstractions for Database Systems · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1979
Database theory
database schema
0.011979
Data Abstractions for Database Systems · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1979
Programming languages and type systems
abstract data types
0.011979
Data Abstractions for Database Systems · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1979

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

axiomatic specification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1979 Data Abstractions for Database Systems
abstract
Data abstractions were originally conceived as a specification tool in programming. They also appear to be useful for exploring and explaining the capabilities and shortcomings of the data definition and manipulation facilities of present-day database systems. Moreover they may lead to new approaches to the design of these facilities. In the first section the paper introduces an axiomatic method for specifying data abstractions and, on that basis, gives precise meaning to familiar notions such as data model, data type, and database schema. In a second step the various possibilities for specifying data types within a given data model are examined and illustrated. It is shown that data types prescribe the individual operations that are allowed within a database. Finally, some additions to the method are discussed which permit the formulation of interrelationships between arbitrary operations.
Peter C. Lockemann, Heinrich C. Mayr, Wolfgang H. Weil, Wolfgang H. Wohlleber
ACM Trans. Database Syst.4