VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shivakanth Sujit
dblp:320/2346
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1744-0841ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 47% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
goal-conditioned planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PcLast: Discovering Plannable Continuous Latent States · ICML 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PcLast: Discovering Plannable Continuous Latent States · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
latent state representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PcLast: Discovering Plannable Continuous Latent States · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
state abstraction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PcLast: Discovering Plannable Continuous Latent States · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › off-policy reinforcement learning
experience replay |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Prioritizing Samples in Reinforcement Learning with Reducible Loss · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
latent dynamics model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Robust Dynamics through Variational Sparse Gating · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Robust Dynamics through Variational Sparse Gating · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning
world model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Robust Dynamics through Variational Sparse Gating · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational autoencoder · 0.8multistep inverse dynamics · 0.8temporal-difference loss · 0.7experience replay · 0.7variational sparse gating · 0.6stochastic binary gates · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | PcLast: Discovering Plannable Continuous Latent StatesabstractGoal-conditioned planning benefits from learned low-dimensional representations of rich observations. While compact latent representations typically learned from variational autoencoders or inverse dynamics enable goal-conditioned decision making, they ignore state reachability, hampering their performance. In this paper, we learn a representation that associates reachable states together for effective planning and goal-conditioned policy learning. We first learn a latent representation with multi-step inverse dynamics (to remove distracting information), and then transform this representation to associate reachable states together in $\ell_2$ space. Our proposals are rigorously tested in various simulation testbeds. Numerical results in reward-based settings show significant improvements in sampling efficiency. Further, in reward-free settings this approach yields layered state abstractions that enable computationally efficient hierarchical planning for reaching ad hoc goals with zero additional samples. Anurag Koul, Shivakanth Sujit, Shaoru Chen, Ben Evans, Byron Xu, Rajan Chari, Riashat Islam, Raihan Seraj, Yonathan Efroni, Lekan P. Molu, Miroslav Dudík, John Langford 0001, Alex Lamb |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Prioritizing Samples in Reinforcement Learning with Reducible LossabstractMost reinforcement learning algorithms take advantage of an experience replay buffer to repeatedly train on samples the agent has observed in the past. Not all samples carry the same amount of significance and simply assigning equal importance to each of the samples is a naïve strategy. In this paper, we propose a method to prioritize samples based on how much we can learn from a sample. We define the learn-ability of a sample as the steady decrease of the training loss associated with this sample over time. We develop an algorithm to prioritize samples with high learn-ability, while assigning lower priority to those that are hard-to-learn, typically caused by noise or stochasticity. We empirically show that across multiple domains our method is more robust than random sampling and also better than just prioritizing with respect to the training loss, i.e. the temporal difference loss, which is used in prioritized experience replay. Shivakanth Sujit, Somjit Nath, Pedro H. M. Braga, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Learning Robust Dynamics through Variational Sparse GatingabstractLearning world models from their sensory inputs enables agents to plan for actions by imagining their future outcomes. World models have previously been shown to improve sample-efficiency in simulated environments with few objects, but have not yet been applied successfully to environments with many objects. In environments with many objects, often only a small number of them are moving or interacting at the same time. In this paper, we investigate integrating this inductive bias of sparse interactions into the latent dynamics of world models trained from pixels. First, we introduce Variational Sparse Gating (VSG), a latent dynamics model that updates its feature dimensions sparsely through stochastic binary gates. Moreover, we propose a simplified architecture Simple Variational Sparse Gating (SVSG) that removes the deterministic pathway of previous models, resulting in a fully stochastic transition function that leverages the VSG mechanism. We evaluate the two model architectures in the BringBackShapes (BBS) environment that features a large number of moving objects and partial observability, demonstrating clear improvements over prior models. Arnav Kumar Jain, Shivakanth Sujit, Shruti Joshi, Vincent Michalski, Danijar Hafner, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Factorized multi-scale multi-resolution residual network for single image deraining
Shivakanth Sujit, Deivalakshmi Subbian, Seok-Bum Ko |
Appl. Intell. | 1 |