Protein-protein interactions play an important role in many biological processes. However, although structure prediction for monomer proteins has achieved great progress with the advent of advanced deep learning algorithms like AlphaFold, the structure prediction for protein-protein complexes remains an open question. Taking advantage of the Transformer model of ESM-MSA, we have developed a deep learning-based model, named DeepHomo2.0, to predict protein-protein interactions of homodimeric complexes by leveraging the direct-coupling analysis (DCA) and Transformer features of sequences and the structure features of monomers. DeepHomo2.0 was extensively evaluated on diverse test sets and compared with eight state-of-the-art methods including protein language model-based, DCA-based and machine learning-based methods. It was shown that DeepHomo2.0 achieved a high precision of >70% with experimental monomer structures and >60% with predicted monomer structures for the top 10 predicted contacts on the test sets and outperformed the other eight methods. Moreover, even the version without using structure information, named DeepHomoSeq, still achieved a good precision of >55% for the top 10 predicted contacts. Integrating the predicted contacts into protein docking significantly improved the structure prediction of realistic Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction homodimeric complexes. DeepHomo2.0 and DeepHomoSeq are available at http://huanglab.phys.hust.edu.cn/DeepHomo2/.

MOTIVATION: Protein-protein interactions (PPI) play important roles in cellular activities. Due to the technical difficulty and high cost of experimental methods, there are considerable interests towards the development of computational approaches, such as protein docking, to decipher PPI patterns. One of the important and difficult aspects in protein docking is recognizing near-native conformations from a set of decoys, but unfortunately, traditional scoring functions still suffer from limited accuracy. Therefore, new scoring methods are pressingly needed in methodological and/or practical implications. RESULTS: We present a new deep learning-based scoring method for ranking protein-protein docking models based on a 3D RepVGG network, named TRScore. To recognize near-native conformations from a set of decoys, TRScore voxelizes the protein-protein interface into a 3D grid labeled by the number of atoms in different physicochemical classes. Benefiting from the deep convolutional RepVGG architecture, TRScore can effectively capture the subtle differences between energetically favorable near-native models and unfavorable non-native decoys without needing extra information. TRScore was extensively evaluated on diverse test sets including protein-protein docking benchmark 5.0 update set, DockGround decoy set, as well as realistic CAPRI decoy set and overall obtained a significant improvement over existing methods in cross-validation and independent evaluations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Codes available at: https://github.com/BioinformaticsCSU/TRScore.

MOTIVATION: Cyclization is a common strategy to enhance the therapeutic potential of peptides. Many cyclic peptide drugs have been approved for clinical use, in which the disulfide-driven cyclic peptide is one of the most prevalent categories. Molecular docking is a powerful computational method to predict the binding modes of molecules. For protein-cyclic peptide docking, a big challenge is considering the flexibility of peptides with conformers constrained by cyclization. RESULTS: Integrating our efficient peptide 3D conformation sampling algorithm MODPEP2.0 and knowledge-based scoring function ITScorePP, we have proposed an extended version of our hierarchical peptide docking algorithm, named HPEPDOCK2.0, to predict the binding modes of the peptide cyclized through a disulfide against a protein. Our HPEPDOCK2.0 approach was extensively evaluated on diverse test sets and compared with the state-of-the-art cyclic peptide docking program AutoDock CrankPep (ADCP). On a benchmark dataset of 18 cyclic peptide-protein complexes, HPEPDOCK2.0 obtained a native contact fraction of above 0.5 for 61% of the cases when the top prediction was considered, compared with 39% for ADCP. On a larger test set of 25 cyclic peptide-protein complexes, HPEPDOCK2.0 yielded a success rate of 44% for the top prediction, compared with 20% for ADCP. In addition, HPEPDOCK2.0 was also validated on two other test sets of 10 and 11 complexes with apo and predicted receptor structures, respectively. HPEPDOCK2.0 is computationally efficient and the average running time for docking a cyclic peptide is about 34 min on a single CPU core, compared with 496 min for ADCP. HPEPDOCK2.0 will facilitate the study of the interaction between cyclic peptides and proteins and the development of therapeutic cyclic peptide drugs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://huanglab.phys.hust.edu.cn/hpepdock/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.