Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Guokai Zheng

dblp:320/5945 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 62% Generative modeling · 38%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
GAN training
0.812024
When Generative Adversarial Networks Meet Sequence Labeling Challenges · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling
0.812024
When Generative Adversarial Networks Meet Sequence Labeling Challenges · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition
0.212024
When Generative Adversarial Networks Meet Sequence Labeling Challenges · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word segmentation
0.212024
When Generative Adversarial Networks Meet Sequence Labeling Challenges · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence tagger · 0.8generative adversarial network · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 When Generative Adversarial Networks Meet Sequence Labeling Challenges
abstract
The current framework for sequence labeling encompasses a feature extractor and a sequence tagger.This study introduces a unified framework named SLGAN, which harnesses the capabilities of Generative Adversarial Networks to address the challenges associated with Sequence Labeling tasks.SLGAN not only mitigates the limitation of GANs in backpropagating loss to discrete data but also exhibits strong adaptability to various sequence labeling tasks.Unlike traditional GANs, the discriminator within SLGAN does not discriminate whether data originates from the discriminator or the generator; instead, it focuses on predicting the correctness of each tag within the tag sequence.We conducted evaluations on six different tasks spanning four languages, including Chinese, Japanese, and Korean Word Segmentation, Chinese and English Named Entity Recognition, and Chinese Part-of-Speech Tagging.Our experimental results illustrate that SLGAN represents a versatile and highly effective solution, consistently achieving stateof-the-art or competitive performance results, irrespective of the specific task or language under consideration. 1
Guokai Zheng, Jiang Dazhi
EMNLP3
2023 An early warning method of abnormal state of laboratory equipment based on Internet of things and running big data
abstract
In order to improve the early warning effect of equipment abnormal state and shorten the early warning time, this paper designs an early warning method of laboratory equipment abnormal state based on the Internet of things and running big data. Collect the running status data of laboratory equipment in the environment of Internet of things, and implement dimension reduction processing on the collected running status data. After the dimensionality reduction, extract the abnormal characteristics of big data of laboratory equipment running. On the basis of iterative update, the real-time feature analysis results are compared with the abnormal feature set, and the early warning response program is started according to the abnormal. According to the experimental results, the maximum false alarm rate of this method is only 1.34%, and the abnormal state response is always kept below 4.0 s when applied, which fully proves that this method effectively realizes the design expectation.
Guokai Zheng, Luxia Yi
Web Intell.1