Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicolas Nytko

dblp:320/7597 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Graph learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.712023
MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods · ICML 2023
Computational science and engineering › numerical analysis
domain decomposition
0.712023
MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network
0.612022
Learning Interface Conditions in Domain Decomposition Solvers · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis
domain decomposition
0.612022
Learning Interface Conditions in Domain Decomposition Solvers · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unsupervised loss function · 1.3multigrid methods · 1.3unsupervised learning · 1.1graph convolutional network · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods
abstract
Domain decomposition methods (DDMs) are popular solvers for discretized systems of partial differential equations (PDEs), with one-level and multilevel variants. These solvers rely on several algorithmic and mathematical parameters, prescribing overlap, subdomain boundary conditions, and other properties of the DDM. While some work has been done on optimizing these parameters, it has mostly focused on the one-level setting or special cases such as structured-grid discretizations with regular subdomain construction. In this paper, we propose multigrid graph neural networks (MG-GNN), a novel GNN architecture for learning optimized parameters in two-level DDMs. We train MG-GNN using a new unsupervised loss function, enabling effective training on small problems that yields robust performance on unstructured grids that are orders of magnitude larger than those in the training set. We show that MG-GNN outperforms popular hierarchical graph network architectures for this optimization and that our proposed loss function is critical to achieving this improved performance.
Ali Taghibakhshi, Nicolas Nytko, Tareq Uz Zaman, Scott P. MacLachlan, Luke N. Olson, Matthew West 0001
ICML2
2022 Learning Interface Conditions in Domain Decomposition Solvers
abstract
Domain decomposition methods are widely used and effective in the approximation of solutions to partial differential equations. Yet the \textit{optimal} construction of these methods requires tedious analysis and is often available only in simplified, structured-grid settings, limiting their use for more complex problems. In this work, we generalize optimized Schwarz domain decomposition methods to unstructured-grid problems, using Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCNNs) and unsupervised learning to learn optimal modifications at subdomain interfaces. A key ingredient in our approach is an improved loss function, enabling effective training on relatively small problems, but robust performance on arbitrarily large problems, with computational cost linear in problem size. The performance of the learned linear solvers is compared with both classical and optimized domain decomposition algorithms, for both structured- and unstructured-grid problems.
Ali Taghibakhshi, Nicolas Nytko, Tareq Uz Zaman, Scott P. MacLachlan, Luke N. Olson, Matthew West 0001
NeurIPS2