VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eduard Tulchinskii
dblp:320/8026
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-2794-4140ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 47% Language models and text generation · 26% Trustworthy machine learning · 21% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational geometry · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
logical consistency |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Quantifying Logical Consistency in Transformers via Query-Key Alignment · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
transformer interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Quantifying Logical Consistency in Transformers via Query-Key Alignment · EMNLP 2025 |
Computational geometry
topological data analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scalar Function Topology Divergence: Comparing Topology of 3D Objects · ECCV (88) 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning topology-preserving data representations · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
topology preservation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning topology-preserving data representations · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › topological representation learning
topology-preserving representation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning topology-preserving data representations · ICLR 2023 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › synthetic media detection
machine-generated text detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Texts · NeurIPS 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Quantifying Logical Consistency in Transformers via Query-Key Alignment · EMNLP 2025 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape matching
3d object comparison |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Scalar Function Topology Divergence: Comparing Topology of 3D Objects · ECCV (88) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
AI-generated text |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Texts · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
manifold learning · 1.3intrinsic dimension estimation · 1.3query-key alignment analysis · 0.9topological data analysis · 0.7persistent homology · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | RTD-Lite: Scalable Topological Analysis for Comparing Weighted Graphs in Learning TasksabstractTopological methods for comparing weighted graphs are valuable in various learning tasks but often suffer from computational inefficiency on large datasets. We introduce RTD-Lite, a scalable algorithm that efficiently compares topological features, specifically connectivity or cluster structures at arbitrary scales, of two weighted graphs with one-to-one correspondence between vertices. By leveraging minimal spanning trees in auxiliary graphs, RTD-Lite captures topological discrepancies with $O(n^2)$ time and memory complexity. This efficiency enables its application in tasks like dimensionality reduction and neural network training. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that RTD-Lite effectively identifies topological differences while significantly reducing computation time compared to existing methods. Moreover, integrating RTD-Lite into neural network training as a loss function component enhances the preservation of topological structures in learned representations. Our code is publicly available at \url{https://github.com/ArGintum/RTD-Lite.} Eduard Tulchinskii, Daria Voronkova, Ilya Trofimov, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2025 | Quantifying Logical Consistency in Transformers via Query-Key AlignmentabstractEduard Tulchinskii, Laida Kushnareva, Anastasia Voznyuk, Andrei Andriiainen, Irina Piontkovskaya, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. Eduard Tulchinskii, Laida Kushnareva, Anastasia Voznyuk, Andrei Andriiainen, Irina Piontkovskaya, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2024 | Scalar Function Topology Divergence: Comparing Topology of 3D ObjectsabstractInternational audience Ilya Trofimov, Daria Voronkova, Eduard Tulchinskii, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov |
ECCV (88) | 3 |
| 2023 | Learning topology-preserving data representations
Ilya Trofimov, Daniil Cherniavskii, Eduard Tulchinskii, Nikita Balabin, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Topological Data Analysis for Speech ProcessingabstractInternational audience Eduard Tulchinskii, Kristian Kuznetsov, Laida Kushnareva, Daniil Cherniavskii, Serguei Barannikov, Irina Piontkovskaya, Sergey I. Nikolenko, Evgeny Burnaev |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |
| 2023 | Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated TextsabstractRapidly increasing quality of AI-generated content makes it difficult to distinguish between human and AI-generated texts, which may lead to undesirable consequences for society. Therefore, it becomes increasingly important to study the properties of human texts that are invariant over text domains and various proficiency of human writers, can be easily calculated for any language, and can robustly separate natural and AI-generated texts regardless of the generation model and sampling method. In this work, we propose such an invariant of human texts, namely the intrinsic dimensionality of the manifold underlying the set of embeddings of a given text sample. We show that the average intrinsic dimensionality of fluent texts in natural language is hovering around the value $9$ for several alphabet-based languages and around $7$ for Chinese, while the average intrinsic dimensionality of AI-generated texts for each language is $\approx 1.5$ lower, with a clear statistical separation between human-generated and AI-generated distributions. This property allows us to build a score-based artificial text detector. The proposed detector's accuracy is stable over text domains, generator models, and human writer proficiency levels, outperforming SOTA detectors in model-agnostic and cross-domain scenarios by a significant margin. Eduard Tulchinskii, Kristian Kuznetsov, Laida Kushnareva, Daniil Cherniavskii, Sergey I. Nikolenko, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov, Irina Piontkovskaya |
NeurIPS | 1 |