Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Eduard Tulchinskii

dblp:320/8026 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-2794-4140ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 47% Language models and text generation · 26% Trustworthy machine learning · 21%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
logical consistency
0.912025
Quantifying Logical Consistency in Transformers via Query-Key Alignment · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
transformer interpretability
0.912025
Quantifying Logical Consistency in Transformers via Query-Key Alignment · EMNLP 2025
Computational geometry
topological data analysis
0.812024
Scalar Function Topology Divergence: Comparing Topology of 3D Objects · ECCV (88) 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction
0.712023
Learning topology-preserving data representations · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
topology preservation
0.712023
Learning topology-preserving data representations · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › topological representation learning
topology-preserving representation
0.712023
Learning topology-preserving data representations · ICLR 2023
Digital forensics and information hiding › synthetic media detection
machine-generated text detection
0.712023
Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Texts · NeurIPS 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning
0.312025
Quantifying Logical Consistency in Transformers via Query-Key Alignment · EMNLP 2025
Geometric modeling and processing › shape matching
3d object comparison
0.212024
Scalar Function Topology Divergence: Comparing Topology of 3D Objects · ECCV (88) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
AI-generated text
0.212023
Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Texts · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

manifold learning · 1.3intrinsic dimension estimation · 1.3query-key alignment analysis · 0.9topological data analysis · 0.7persistent homology · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 RTD-Lite: Scalable Topological Analysis for Comparing Weighted Graphs in Learning Tasks
abstract
Topological methods for comparing weighted graphs are valuable in various learning tasks but often suffer from computational inefficiency on large datasets. We introduce RTD-Lite, a scalable algorithm that efficiently compares topological features, specifically connectivity or cluster structures at arbitrary scales, of two weighted graphs with one-to-one correspondence between vertices. By leveraging minimal spanning trees in auxiliary graphs, RTD-Lite captures topological discrepancies with $O(n^2)$ time and memory complexity. This efficiency enables its application in tasks like dimensionality reduction and neural network training. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that RTD-Lite effectively identifies topological differences while significantly reducing computation time compared to existing methods. Moreover, integrating RTD-Lite into neural network training as a loss function component enhances the preservation of topological structures in learned representations. Our code is publicly available at \url{https://github.com/ArGintum/RTD-Lite.}
Eduard Tulchinskii, Daria Voronkova, Ilya Trofimov, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov
AISTATS1
2025 Quantifying Logical Consistency in Transformers via Query-Key Alignment
abstract
Eduard Tulchinskii, Laida Kushnareva, Anastasia Voznyuk, Andrei Andriiainen, Irina Piontkovskaya, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Eduard Tulchinskii, Laida Kushnareva, Anastasia Voznyuk, Andrei Andriiainen, Irina Piontkovskaya, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov
EMNLP1
2024 Scalar Function Topology Divergence: Comparing Topology of 3D Objects
abstract
International audience
Ilya Trofimov, Daria Voronkova, Eduard Tulchinskii, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov
ECCV (88)3
2023 Learning topology-preserving data representations
Ilya Trofimov, Daniil Cherniavskii, Eduard Tulchinskii, Nikita Balabin, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov
ICLR3
2023 Topological Data Analysis for Speech Processing
abstract
International audience
Eduard Tulchinskii, Kristian Kuznetsov, Laida Kushnareva, Daniil Cherniavskii, Serguei Barannikov, Irina Piontkovskaya, Sergey I. Nikolenko, Evgeny Burnaev
INTERSPEECH1
2023 Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Texts
abstract
Rapidly increasing quality of AI-generated content makes it difficult to distinguish between human and AI-generated texts, which may lead to undesirable consequences for society. Therefore, it becomes increasingly important to study the properties of human texts that are invariant over text domains and various proficiency of human writers, can be easily calculated for any language, and can robustly separate natural and AI-generated texts regardless of the generation model and sampling method. In this work, we propose such an invariant of human texts, namely the intrinsic dimensionality of the manifold underlying the set of embeddings of a given text sample. We show that the average intrinsic dimensionality of fluent texts in natural language is hovering around the value $9$ for several alphabet-based languages and around $7$ for Chinese, while the average intrinsic dimensionality of AI-generated texts for each language is $\approx 1.5$ lower, with a clear statistical separation between human-generated and AI-generated distributions. This property allows us to build a score-based artificial text detector. The proposed detector's accuracy is stable over text domains, generator models, and human writer proficiency levels, outperforming SOTA detectors in model-agnostic and cross-domain scenarios by a significant margin.
Eduard Tulchinskii, Kristian Kuznetsov, Laida Kushnareva, Daniil Cherniavskii, Sergey I. Nikolenko, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov, Irina Piontkovskaya
NeurIPS1