VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Youssef Nader
dblp:320/8331
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | DNNR: Differential Nearest Neighbors Regression · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
nearest neighbor regression |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | DNNR: Differential Nearest Neighbors Regression · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
taylor approximation · 0.6gradient estimation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | DNNR: Differential Nearest Neighbors RegressionabstractK-nearest neighbors (KNN) is one of the earliest and most established algorithms in machine learning. For regression tasks, KNN averages the targets within a neighborhood which poses a number of challenges: the neighborhood definition is crucial for the predictive performance as neighbors might be selected based on uninformative features, and averaging does not account for how the function changes locally. We propose a novel method called Differential Nearest Neighbors Regression (DNNR) that addresses both issues simultaneously: during training, DNNR estimates local gradients to scale the features; during inference, it performs an n-th order Taylor approximation using estimated gradients. In a large-scale evaluation on over 250 datasets, we find that DNNR performs comparably to state-of-the-art gradient boosting methods and MLPs while maintaining the simplicity and transparency of KNN. This allows us to derive theoretical error bounds and inspect failures. In times that call for transparency of ML models, DNNR provides a good balance between performance and interpretability. Youssef Nader, Leon Sixt, Tim Landgraf |
ICML | 1 |