VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Silin Du
dblp:321/0316
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
multi-step reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Jupiter: Enhancing LLM Data Analysis Capabilities via Notebook and Inference-Time Value-Guided Search · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
tool use |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Jupiter: Enhancing LLM Data Analysis Capabilities via Notebook and Inference-Time Value-Guided Search · AAAI 2026 |
Compilers and program optimization
code generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Jupiter: Enhancing LLM Data Analysis Capabilities via Notebook and Inference-Time Value-Guided Search · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
value model learning · 2.0monte carlo tree search · 2.0inference-time search · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Jupiter: Enhancing LLM Data Analysis Capabilities via Notebook and Inference-Time Value-Guided SearchabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have shown great promise in automating data science workflows. However, existing models still struggle with multi-step reasoning and tool use, limiting their effectiveness on complex data analysis tasks. To address this limitation, we propose a scalable pipeline that extracts high-quality, tool-based data analysis tasks and their executable multi-step solutions from real-world Jupyter notebooks and associated data files. Using this pipeline, we introduce NbQA, a large-scale dataset of standardized task–solution pairs that reflect authentic tool-use patterns in practical data science scenarios. To further enhance the multi-step reasoning capabilities, we present Jupiter, a framework that formulates data analysis as a search problem and applies Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to generate diverse solution trajectories for value model learning. During inference, Jupiter combines the value model and node visit counts to efficiently collect executable multi-step plans with minimal search steps. Experimental results show that Qwen2.5-7B and 14B-Instruct models on NbQA solve 77.82% and 86.38% of tasks on InfiAgent-DABench, respectively—matching or surpassing GPT-4o and advanced agent frameworks. Further evaluations demonstrate improved generalization and stronger tool-use reasoning across diverse multi-step reasoning tasks. Shuocheng Li, Silin Du, Wenxuan Zeng, Mengyu Zhou, Yeye He, Haoyu Dong 0001, Shi Han, Dongmei Zhang 0001 |
AAAI | 3 |