Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tianyi Men
dblp:321/0393
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Multi-agent systems · 26% Reinforcement learning · 26% Language models and text generation · 25% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Empowering GUI Agents via Autonomous Experience Exploration and Hindsight Experience Utilization for Task Planning · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Empowering GUI Agents via Autonomous Experience Exploration and Hindsight Experience Utilization for Task Planning · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
agent benchmarking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Agent-RewardBench: Towards a Unified Benchmark for Reward Modeling across Perception, Planning, and Safety in Real-World Multimodal Agents · ACL (1) 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
LLM-based multi-agent systems |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Troublemaker with Contagious Jailbreak Makes Chaos in Honest Towns · ACL (1) 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multimodal agent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Agent-RewardBench: Towards a Unified Benchmark for Reward Modeling across Perception, Planning, and Safety in Real-World Multimodal Agents · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Agent-RewardBench: Towards a Unified Benchmark for Reward Modeling across Perception, Planning, and Safety in Real-World Multimodal Agents · ACL (1) 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › large language model security
adversarial attacks on language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Troublemaker with Contagious Jailbreak Makes Chaos in Honest Towns · ACL (1) 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
jailbreak attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Troublemaker with Contagious Jailbreak Makes Chaos in Honest Towns · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unlocking the Future: Exploring Look-Ahead Planning Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › search-based planning
lookahead planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unlocking the Future: Exploring Look-Ahead Planning Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unlocking the Future: Exploring Look-Ahead Planning Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multimodal large language model · 1.9retrieval suffix optimization · 1.7contagious jailbreak · 1.7adversarial replication · 1.7hindsight experience replay · 1.0probing · 0.8information flow analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Empowering GUI Agents via Autonomous Experience Exploration and Hindsight Experience Utilization for Task PlanningabstractMultimodal web agents can assist humans in operating repetitive GUI tasks, where effective task planning is essential for decomposing complex tasks into executable actions.While small open-source MLLMs are cost-efficient and privacy-preserving compared with commercial large models, they suffer from weak planning and limited cross-website generalization.To address these limitations, we introduce the planning experience exploration and utilization (PEEU) method, which autonomously explores environments to discover experiences and utilizes hindsight experience to synthesize strictly aligned, high-level training data.To quantitatively analyze the generalization behaviors driving this performance, we propose the task decomposition hierarchical analysis framework (TDHAF) to systematically study compositional generalization across three task granularities: low, middle and high levels.Our analysis reveals that mastering low-level atomic skills does not guarantee high-level planning competence, while high-level task training yields stronger OOD generalization.Experiments on real-world benchmarks demonstrate PEEU's superior effectiveness: our 7B model achieves 30.6% accuracy, outperforming the much larger Qwen2.5-VL-32Bmodel.These demonstrate constructing hindsight high-level tasks and leveraging experiences is crucial for OOD planning abilities of small MLLMs. Tianyi Men, Zhuoran Jin, Yubo Chen 0001, Kang Liu 0001, Jun Zhao 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | A Troublemaker with Contagious Jailbreak Makes Chaos in Honest TownsabstractWith the development of large language models, they are widely used as agents in various fields. A key component of agents is memory, which stores vital information but is susceptible to jailbreak attacks. Existing research mainly focuses on single-agent attacks and shared memory attacks. However, real-world scenarios often involve independent memory. In this paper, we propose the Troublemaker Makes Chaos in Honest Town (TMCHT) task, a large-scale, multi-agent, multi-topology text-based attack evaluation framework. TMCHT involves one attacker agent attempting to mislead an entire society of agents. We identify two major challenges in multi-agent attacks: (1) Non-complete graph structure, (2) Large-scale systems. We attribute these challenges to a phenomenon we term toxicity disappearing. To address these issues, we propose an Adversarial Replication Contagious Jailbreak (ARCJ) method, which optimizes the retrieval suffix to make poisoned samples more easily retrieved and optimizes the replication suffix to make poisoned samples have contagious ability. We demonstrate the superiority of our approach in TMCHT, with 23.51%, 18.95%, and 52.93% improvements in line, star topologies, and 100-agent settings. It reveals potential contagion risks in widely used multi-agent architectures. Tianyi Men, Zhuoran Jin, Yubo Chen 0001, Kang Liu 0001, Jun Zhao 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Agent-RewardBench: Towards a Unified Benchmark for Reward Modeling across Perception, Planning, and Safety in Real-World Multimodal AgentsabstractAs Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) advance, multimodal agents show promise in real-world tasks like web navigation and embodied intelligence.However, due to limitations in a lack of external feedback, these agents struggle with self-correction and generalization.A promising approach is to use reward models as external feedback, but there is no clear on how to select reward models for agents.Thus, there is an urgent need to build a reward bench targeted at agents.To address these challenges, we propose Agent-RewardBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate reward modeling ability in MLLMs.The benchmark is characterized by three key features: (1) Multiple dimensions and real-world agent scenarios evaluation.It covers perception, planning, and safety with 7 scenarios; (2) Step-level reward evaluation.It allows for the assessment of agent capabilities at the individual steps of a task, providing a more granular view of performance during the planning process; and (3) Appropriately difficulty and highquality.We carefully sample from 10 diverse models, difficulty control to maintain task challenges, and manual verification to ensure the integrity of the data.Experiments demonstrate that even state-of-the-art multimodal models show limited performance, highlighting the need for specialized training in agent reward modeling.Code is available at github. Tianyi Men, Zhuoran Jin, Yubo Chen 0001, Kang Liu 0001, Jun Zhao 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | Unlocking the Future: Exploring Look-Ahead Planning Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language ModelsabstractPlanning, as the core module of agents, is crucial in various fields such as embodied agents, web navigation, and tool using.With the development of large language models (LLMs), some researchers treat large language models as intelligent agents to stimulate and evaluate their planning capabilities.However, the planning mechanism is still unclear.In this work, we focus on exploring the look-ahead planning mechanism in large language models from the perspectives of information flow and internal representations.First, we study how planning is done internally by analyzing the multi-layer perception (MLP) and multi-head self-attention (MHSA) components at the last token.We find that the output of MHSA in the middle layers at the last token can directly decode the decision to some extent.Based on this discovery, we further trace the source of MHSA by information flow, and we reveal that MHSA mainly extracts information from spans of the goal states and recent steps.According to information flow, we continue to study what information is encoded within it.Specifically, we explore whether future decisions have been encoded in advance in the representation of flow.We demonstrate that the middle and upper layers encode a few shortterm future decisions to some extent when planning is successful.Overall, our research analyzes the look-ahead planning mechanisms of LLMs, facilitating future research on LLMs performing planning tasks. Tianyi Men, Zhuoran Jin, Yubo Chen 0001, Kang Liu 0001, Jun Zhao 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |