Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sireesh Gururaja

dblp:321/0493 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0004-0309-3393ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 44% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 44% Deep learning architectures and training · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › few-shot learning
few-shot transfer
0.712023
Linguistic representations for fewer-shot relation extraction across domains · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction
0.712023
Linguistic representations for fewer-shot relation extraction across domains · ACL (1) 2023
Computational social science and digital humanities
science of science
0.712023
To Build Our Future, We Must Know Our Past: Contextualizing Paradigm Shifts in Natural Language Processing · EMNLP 2023
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.712023
To Build Our Future, We Must Know Our Past: Contextualizing Paradigm Shifts in Natural Language Processing · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.212023
Linguistic representations for fewer-shot relation extraction across domains · ACL (1) 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interview study · 1.3bibliometric analysis · 1.3syntactic graph · 0.7semantic graph · 0.7few-shot learning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Linguistic representations for fewer-shot relation extraction across domains
abstract
Recent work has demonstrated the positive impact of incorporating linguistic representations as additional context and scaffolding on the in-domain performance of several NLP tasks.We extend this work by exploring the impact of linguistic representations on cross-domain performance in a few-shot transfer setting.An important question is whether linguistic representations enhance generalizability by providing features that function as cross-domain pivots.We focus on the task of relation extraction on three datasets of procedural text in two domains, cooking and materials science.Our approach augments a popular transformerbased architecture by alternately incorporating syntactic and semantic graphs constructed by freely available off-the-shelf tools.We examine their utility for enhancing generalization, and investigate whether earlier findings, e.g. that semantic representations can be more helpful than syntactic ones, extend to relation extraction in multiple domains.We find that while the inclusion of these graphs results in significantly higher performance in few-shot transfer, both types of graph exhibit roughly equivalent utility.
Sireesh Gururaja, Ritam Dutt, Tinglong Liao, Carolyn P. Rosé
ACL (1)1
2023 To Build Our Future, We Must Know Our Past: Contextualizing Paradigm Shifts in Natural Language Processing
abstract
NLP is in a period of disruptive change that is impacting our methodologies, funding sources, and public perception.In this work, we seek to understand how to shape our future by better understanding our past.We study factors that shape NLP as a field, including culture, incentives, and infrastructure by conducting longform interviews with 26 NLP researchers of varying seniority, research area, institution, and social identity.Our interviewees identify cyclical patterns in the field, as well as new shifts without historical parallel, including changes in benchmark culture and software infrastructure.We complement this discussion with quantitative analysis of citation, authorship, and language use in the ACL Anthology over time.We conclude by discussing shared visions, concerns, and hopes for the future of NLP.We hope that this study of our field's past and present can prompt informed discussion of our community's implicit norms and more deliberate action to consciously shape the future.
Sireesh Gururaja, Amanda Bertsch, Clara Na, David Gray Widder, Emma Strubell
EMNLP1