Yibin Lei

dblp:321/0804 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-9558-5548ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 33% Language models and text generation · 27% Machine translation · 19%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 19 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
retrieval models
1.922026
Making Large Language Models Efficient Dense Retrievers · ACL (1) 2026
Neural Lexical Search with Learned Sparse Retrieval · SIGIR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
1.122026
Meta-Task Prompting Elicits Embeddings from Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Making Large Language Models Efficient Dense Retrievers · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
1.012026
Making Large Language Models Efficient Dense Retrievers · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
1.012026
Making Large Language Models Efficient Dense Retrievers · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
structured pruning
1.012026
Making Large Language Models Efficient Dense Retrievers · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
1.012026
Making Large Language Models Efficient Dense Retrievers · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding
0.912025
Calibrating Translation Decoding with Quality Estimation on LLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
large language model translation
0.912025
Calibrating Translation Decoding with Quality Estimation on LLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
text embedding
0.912025
Enhancing Lexicon-Based Text Embeddings with Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › machine translation evaluation
translation quality estimation
0.912025
Calibrating Translation Decoding with Quality Estimation on LLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
SERVAL: Surprisingly Effective Zero-Shot Visual Document Retrieval Powered by Large Vision and Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
cross-modal retrieval
0.912025
SERVAL: Surprisingly Effective Zero-Shot Visual Document Retrieval Powered by Large Vision and Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval › retrieval models › sparse retrieval
learned sparse retrieval
0.912025
Neural Lexical Search with Learned Sparse Retrieval · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval › image retrieval
visual document retrieval
0.912025
SERVAL: Surprisingly Effective Zero-Shot Visual Document Retrieval Powered by Large Vision and Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis › document representation
text embedding
0.812024
Meta-Task Prompting Elicits Embeddings from Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model representation
0.312025
Enhancing Lexicon-Based Text Embeddings with Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization
0.312025
Calibrating Translation Decoding with Quality Estimation on LLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Information retrieval › retrieval models
neural retrieval
0.312025
Neural Lexical Search with Learned Sparse Retrieval · SIGIR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding
sentence embedding
0.212024
Meta-Task Prompting Elicits Embeddings from Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-specific fine-tuning · 2.0layer redundancy analysis · 2.0MLP compression · 2.0zero-shot retrieval · 1.7vision-language model captioning · 1.7text embedding · 1.7token embedding clustering · 0.9pooling strategies · 0.9pearson correlation optimization · 0.9neural network · 0.9bidirectional attention · 0.9prompt engineering · 0.8meta-task prompting · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Making Large Language Models Efficient Dense Retrievers
abstract
Recent work has shown that directly fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for dense retrieval yields strong performance, but their substantial parameter counts make them computationally inefficient.While prior studies have revealed significant layer redundancy in LLMs for generative tasks, it remains unclear whether similar redundancy exists when these models are adapted for retrieval tasks, which require encoding entire sequences into fixed representations rather than generating tokens iteratively.To this end, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of layer redundancy in LLM-based dense retrievers.We find that, in contrast to generative settings, MLP layers are substantially more prunable, while attention layers remain critical for semantic aggregation.Building on this insight, we propose EffiR, a framework for developing efficient retrievers that performs large-scale MLP compression through a coarseto-fine strategy (coarse-grained depth reduction followed by fine-grained width reduction), combined with retrieval-specific fine-tuning.Across diverse BEIR datasets and LLM backbones, EffiR achieves substantial reductions in model size and inference cost while preserving the performance of full-size models. 1 * Equal contribution 1 Our code and models are available at https://github. com/
Yibin Lei, Shwai He, Andrew Yates
ACL (1)1
2026 Neural Lexical Search with Learned Sparse Retrieval
Andrew Yates, Carlos Eduardo Rosar Kós Lassance, Cosimo Rulli, Eugene Yang 0001, Sean MacAvaney, Siddharth A. K. Singh, Thong Nguyen 0004, Yibin Lei
ECIR (4)8
2026 Improving zero-shot translation with the navigation ability-enhanced language tags
Changtong Zan, Liang Ding 0006, Li Shen 0008, Yibin Lei, Yibing Zhan, Weifeng Liu 0001
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.4
2025 Enhancing Lexicon-Based Text Embeddings with Large Language Models
abstract
Recent large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance on general-purpose text embedding tasks.While dense embeddings have dominated related research, we introduce the first lexicon-based embeddings (LENS) leveraging LLMs that achieve competitive performance on these tasks.LENS consolidates the vocabulary space through token embedding clustering to handle the issue of token redundancy in LLM vocabularies.To further improve performance, we investigate bidirectional attention and various pooling strategies.Specifically, LENS simplifies lexical matching with redundant vocabularies by assigning each dimension to a specific token cluster, where semantically similar tokens are grouped together.Extensive experiments demonstrate that LENS outperforms dense embeddings on the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB), delivering compact representations with dimensionality comparable to dense counterparts.Furthermore, LENS inherently supports efficient embedding dimension pruning without any specialized objectives like Matryoshka Representation Learning.Notably, combining LENS with dense embeddings achieves state-of-the-art performance on the retrieval subset of MTEB (i.e., BEIR). 1
Yibin Lei, Tao Shen 0001, Yu Cao 0014, Andrew Yates
ACL (1)1
2025 SERVAL: Surprisingly Effective Zero-Shot Visual Document Retrieval Powered by Large Vision and Language Models
abstract
Visual Document Retrieval (VDR) typically operates as text-to-image retrieval using specialized bi-encoders trained to directly embed document images.We revisit a zero-shot generateand-encode pipeline: a vision-language model first produces a detailed textual description of each document image, which is then embedded by a standard text encoder.On the ViDoRe-v2 benchmark, the method reaches 63.4% nDCG@5, surpassing the strongest specialised multi-vector visual document encoder.It also scales better to large collections and offers broader multilingual coverage.Analysis shows that modern vision-language models capture complex textual and visual cues with sufficient granularity to act as a reusable semantic proxy.By offloading modality alignment to pretrained vision-language models, our approach removes the need for computationally intensive text-image contrastive training and establishes a strong zero-shot baseline for future VDR systems.Our code is available for reproduction at: thongnt99/serval
Thong Nguyen 0004, Yibin Lei, Jia-Huei Ju, Andrew Yates
EMNLP2
2025 Calibrating Translation Decoding with Quality Estimation on LLMs
abstract
Neural machine translation (NMT) systems typically employ maximum *a posteriori* (MAP) decoding to select the highest-scoring translation from the distribution. However, recent evidence highlights the inadequacy of MAP decoding, often resulting in low-quality or even pathological hypotheses as the decoding objective is only weakly aligned with real-world translation quality. This paper proposes to directly calibrate hypothesis likelihood with translation quality from a distributional view by directly optimizing their Pearson correlation, thereby enhancing decoding effectiveness. With our method, translation with large language models (LLMs) improves substantially after limited training (2K instances per direction). This improvement is orthogonal to those achieved through supervised fine-tuning, leading to substantial gains across a broad range of metrics and human evaluations. This holds even when applied to top-performing translation-specialized LLMs fine-tuned on high-quality translation data, such as Tower, or when compared to recent preference optimization methods, like CPO. Moreover, the calibrated translation likelihood can directly serve as a strong proxy for translation quality, closely approximating or even surpassing some state-of-the-art translation quality estimation models, like CometKiwi. Lastly, our in-depth analysis demonstrates that calibration enhances the effectiveness of MAP decoding, thereby enabling greater efficiency in real-world deployment. The resulting state-of-the-art translation model, which covers 10 languages, along with the accompanying code and human evaluation data, has been released: https://github.com/moore3930/calibrating-llm-mt.
Yibin Lei, Christof Monz
NeurIPS2
2025 Neural Lexical Search with Learned Sparse Retrieval
abstract
Learned Sparse Retrieval (LSR) techniques use neural machinery to represent queries and documents as learned bags of words. In contrast with other neural retrieval techniques, such as generative retrieval and dense retrieval, LSR has been shown to be a remarkably robust, transferable, and efficient family of methods for retrieving high-quality search results. This half-day tutorial aims to provide an extensive overview of LSR, ranging from its fundamentals to the latest emerging techniques. By the end of the tutorial, attendees will be familiar with the important design decisions of an LSR system, know how to apply them to text and other modalities, and understand the latest techniques for retrieving with them efficiently. Website: https://lsr-tutorial.github.io
Andrew Yates, Carlos Eduardo Rosar Kós Lassance, Cosimo Rulli, Eugene Yang 0001, Sean MacAvaney, Siddharth A. K. Singh, Thong Nguyen 0004, Yibin Lei
SIGIR8
2024 Meta-Task Prompting Elicits Embeddings from Large Language Models
abstract
We introduce a new unsupervised text embedding method, Meta-Task Prompting with Explicit One-Word Limitation (MetaEOL), for generating high-quality sentence embeddings from Large Language Models (LLMs) without the need for model fine-tuning.Leveraging meta-task prompting, MetaEOL guides LLMs to produce embeddings through a series of carefully designed prompts that address multiple representational aspects.Our comprehensive experiments demonstrate that embeddings averaged from various meta-tasks are versatile embeddings that yield competitive performance on Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) benchmarks and excel in downstream tasks, surpassing contrastive-trained models.Our findings suggest a new scaling law, offering a versatile and resource-efficient approach for embedding generation across diverse scenarios.1
Yibin Lei, Tianyi Zhou 0001, Tao Shen 0001, Yu Cao 0014, Chongyang Tao, Andrew Yates
ACL (1)1