Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jinhwan Nam
dblp:321/3268
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 43% Representation and self-supervised learning · 7% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › image editing
diffusion-based image editing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Addressing Text Embedding Leakage in Diffusion-Based Image Editing · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Addressing Text Embedding Leakage in Diffusion-Based Image Editing · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Few-shot Unlearning · SP 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Few-shot Unlearning · SP 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
text embedding |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Addressing Text Embedding Leakage in Diffusion-Based Image Editing · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffusion model · 0.9model inversion · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Addressing Text Embedding Leakage in Diffusion-Based Image Editing
Sunung Mun, Jinhwan Nam, Sunghyun Cho, Jungseul Ok |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2024 | Few-shot UnlearningabstractWe consider the problem of machine unlearning to erase the impact of a target dataset, used in training but incorrect or sensitive, from a trained model. It has been often presumed that every data sample to erase or remain is entirely identifiable and thus clarifies the desired model behavior after unlearning. However, such a flawless identification can be infeasible in practice. We pose a further realistic yet challenging scenario, referred to as few-shot unlearning, where only a few samples of target data are provided while aiming at achieving the underlying intention (e.g., correcting mislabels, countering a certain privacy attack, or specifying nothing) behind the full target dataset. We then devise a few-shot unlearning method including a new model inversion technique, specialized for unlearning scenarios, to retrieve a proxy of the training dataset from the trained model if needed. We demonstrate that our method using only a tiny subset of target data can achieve similar performance to the state-of-the-art methods with full access to target data. Our code and results are available at https://github.com/ml-postech/Few-shot-Unlearning. Youngsik Yoon, Jinhwan Nam, Hyojeong Yun, Jaeho Lee 0001, Dongwoo Kim 0002, Jungseul Ok |
SP | 2 |