Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Moonjeong Park

dblp:321/3773 · also Moon Jeong Park, MoonJeong Park · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Graph learning · 46% Trustworthy machine learning · 29% Language models and text generation · 11%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
1.622025
Influence Functions for Edge Edits in Non-Convex Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Mitigating Oversmoothing Through Reverse Process of GNNs for Heterophilic Graphs · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification
1.012026
Posterior Label Smoothing for Node Classification · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › training data attribution
influence function
0.912025
Influence Functions for Edge Edits in Non-Convex Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Influence Functions for Edge Edits in Non-Convex Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation › personalization
LLM personalization
0.912025
CoPL: Collaborative Preference Learning for Personalizing LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.912025
CoPL: Collaborative Preference Learning for Personalizing LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Recommender systems › user modeling
preference reasoning
0.912025
CoPL: Collaborative Preference Learning for Personalizing LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-smoothing mitigation
0.812024
Mitigating Oversmoothing Through Reverse Process of GNNs for Heterophilic Graphs · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
label smoothing
0.312026
Posterior Label Smoothing for Node Classification · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.312026
Posterior Label Smoothing for Node Classification · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack
0.312025
Influence Functions for Edge Edits in Non-Convex Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
LoRA mixture of experts
0.312025
CoPL: Collaborative Preference Learning for Personalizing LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning
0.312025
CoPL: Collaborative Preference Learning for Personalizing LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.312025
Influence Functions for Edge Edits in Non-Convex Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
heterophily
0.212024
Mitigating Oversmoothing Through Reverse Process of GNNs for Heterophilic Graphs · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mixture of experts · 1.7collaborative filtering · 1.7LoRA · 1.7pseudo-labeling · 1.0proximal bregman response function · 0.9influence functions · 0.9reverse diffusion process · 0.8message passing · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Posterior Label Smoothing for Node Classification
abstract
Label smoothing is a widely studied regularization technique in machine learning. However, its potential for node classification in graph-structured data, spanning homophilic to heterophilic graphs, remains largely unexplored. We introduce posterior label smoothing, a novel method for transductive node classification that derives soft labels from a posterior distribution conditioned on neighborhood labels. The likelihood and prior distributions are estimated from the global statistics of the graph structure, allowing our approach to adapt naturally to various graph properties. We evaluate our method on 10 benchmark datasets using eight baseline models, demonstrating consistent improvements in classification accuracy. The following analysis demonstrates that soft labels mitigate overfitting during training, leading to better generalization performance, and that pseudo-labeling effectively refines the global label statistics of the graph.
Jaeseung Heo, Moonjeong Park, Dongwoo Kim 0002
AAAI2
2025 CoPL: Collaborative Preference Learning for Personalizing LLMs
abstract
Personalizing large language models (LLMs) is important for aligning outputs with diverse user preferences, yet existing methods struggle with flexibility and generalization.We propose CoPL (Collaborative Preference Learning), a graph-based collaborative filtering framework that models user-response relationships to enhance preference estimation, particularly in sparse annotation settings.By integrating a mixture of LoRA experts, CoPL efficiently fine-tunes LLMs while dynamically balancing shared and user-specific preferences.Additionally, an optimization-free adaptation strategy enables generalization to unseen users without fine-tuning.Experiments on TL;DR, UltraFeedback-P, and PersonalLLM datasets demonstrate that CoPL outperforms existing personalized reward models, effectively capturing both common and controversial preferences, making it a scalable solution for personalized LLM alignment.The code is available at https://github.com/ml-postech/CoPL.
Youngbin Choi, Seunghyuk Cho, Minjong Lee, Moonjeong Park, Yesong Ko, Jungseul Ok, Dongwoo Kim 0002
EMNLP4
2025 Influence Functions for Edge Edits in Non-Convex Graph Neural Networks
abstract
Understanding how individual edges influence the behavior of graph neural networks (GNNs) is essential for improving their interpretability and robustness. Graph influence functions have emerged as promising tools to efficiently estimate the effects of edge deletions without retraining. However, existing influence prediction methods rely on strict convexity assumptions, exclusively consider the influence of edge deletions while disregarding edge insertions, and fail to capture changes in message propagation caused by these modifications. In this work, we propose a proximal Bregman response function specifically tailored for GNNs, relaxing the convexity requirement and enabling accurate influence prediction for standard neural network architectures. Furthermore, our method explicitly accounts for message propagation effects and extends influence prediction to both edge deletions and insertions in a principled way. Experiments with real-world datasets demonstrate accurate influence predictions for different characteristics of GNNs. We further demonstrate that the influence function is versatile in applications such as graph rewiring and adversarial attacks.
Jaeseung Heo, Kyeongheung Yun, Seokwon Yoon, Moonjeong Park, Jungseul Ok, Dongwoo Kim 0002
NeurIPS4
2024 Mitigating Oversmoothing Through Reverse Process of GNNs for Heterophilic Graphs
abstract
Graph Neural Network (GNN) resembles the diffusion process, leading to the over-smoothing of learned representations when stacking many layers. Hence, the reverse process of message passing can produce the distinguishable node representations by inverting the forward message propagation. The distinguishable representations can help us to better classify neighboring nodes with different labels, such as in heterophilic graphs. In this work, we apply the design principle of the reverse process to the three variants of the GNNs. Through the experiments on heterophilic graph data, where adjacent nodes need to have different representations for successful classification, we show that the reverse process significantly improves the prediction performance in many cases. Additional analysis reveals that the reverse mechanism can mitigate the over-smoothing over hundreds of layers. Our code is available at https://github.com/ml-postech/reverse-gnn.
Moonjeong Park, Jaeseung Heo, Dongwoo Kim 0002
ICML1
2022 MetaSSD: Meta-Learned Self-Supervised Detection
abstract
Deep learning-based symbol detector gains increasing attention due to the simple algorithm design than the traditional model-based algorithms such as Viterbi and BCJR. The supervised learning framework is often employed to train a model, where true symbols are necessary. There are two major limitations in the supervised approaches: a) a model needs to be retrained from scratch when new train symbols come to adapt to a new channel status, and b) the length of the training symbols needs to be longer than a certain threshold to make the model generalize well on unseen symbols. To overcome these challenges, we propose a meta-learning-based self-supervised symbol detector named MetaSSD. Our contribution is two-fold: a) meta-learning helps the model adapt to a new channel environment based on experience with various meta-training environments, and b) self-supervised learning helps the model to use relatively less supervision than the previously suggested learning-based detectors. In experiments, MetaSSD outperforms OFDM-MMSE with noisy channel information and shows comparable results with BCJR. Further ablation studies show the necessity of each component in our framework.
Moonjeong Park, Jungseul Ok, Yo-Seb Jeon, Dongwoo Kim 0002
ISIT1
2022 Large-scale tucker Tensor factorization for sparse and accurate decomposition
Jun-Gi Jang, Moonjeong Park, Jongwuk Lee, Lee Sael
J. Supercomput.2