VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joe Benton
dblp:321/4105
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Generative modeling · 32% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Failures to Find Transferable Image Jailbreaks Between Vision-Language Models · ICLR 2025 Many-shot Jailbreaking · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Nearly d-Linear Convergence Bounds for Diffusion Models via Stochastic Localization · ICLR 2024 A Continuous Time Framework for Discrete Denoising Models · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Failures to Find Transferable Image Jailbreaks Between Vision-Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial attack
transfer attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Failures to Find Transferable Image Jailbreaks Between Vision-Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Failures to Find Transferable Image Jailbreaks Between Vision-Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Nearly d-Linear Convergence Bounds for Diffusion Models via Stochastic Localization · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model safety |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Many-shot Jailbreaking · NeurIPS 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
jailbreak attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Many-shot Jailbreaking · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › divergence minimization
alpha-divergence minimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Alpha-divergence Variational Inference Meets Importance Weighted Auto-Encoders: Methodology and Asymptotics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
importance weighted autoencoder |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Alpha-divergence Variational Inference Meets Importance Weighted Auto-Encoders: Methodology and Asymptotics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Alpha-divergence Variational Inference Meets Importance Weighted Auto-Encoders: Methodology and Asymptotics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Alpha-divergence Variational Inference Meets Importance Weighted Auto-Encoders: Methodology and Asymptotics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › markov chain
continuous-time markov chain |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Continuous Time Framework for Discrete Denoising Models · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
continuous-time model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Continuous Time Framework for Discrete Denoising Models · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
discrete diffusion model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Continuous Time Framework for Discrete Denoising Models · NeurIPS 2022 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
prompt injection |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Many-shot Jailbreaking · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Alpha-divergence Variational Inference Meets Importance Weighted Auto-Encoders: Methodology and Asymptotics · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient-based optimization · 1.7ensemble attack · 1.7stochastic localization · 1.5reverse SDE discretization · 1.5long-context prompting · 1.5in-context learning · 1.5girsanov transform · 1.5unbiased gradient estimation · 0.7reparameterization · 0.7importance weighting · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Failures to Find Transferable Image Jailbreaks Between Vision-Language ModelsabstractThe integration of new modalities into frontier AI systems offers exciting capabilities, but also increases the possibility such systems can be adversarially manipulated in undesirable ways.
In this work, we focus on a popular class of vision-language models (VLMs) that generate text outputs conditioned on visual and textual inputs.
We conducted a large-scale empirical study to assess the transferability of gradient-based universal image "jailbreaks" using a diverse set of over 40 open-parameter VLMs, including 18 new VLMs that we publicly release.
Overall, we find that transferable gradient-based image jailbreaks are extremely difficult to obtain.
When an image jailbreak is optimized against a single VLM or against an ensemble of VLMs, the jailbreak successfully jailbreaks the attacked VLM(s), but exhibits little-to-no transfer to any other VLMs; transfer is not affected by whether the attacked and target VLMs possess matching vision backbones or language models, whether the language model underwent instruction-following and/or safety-alignment training, or many other factors.
Only two settings display partially successful transfer: between identically-pretrained and identically-initialized VLMs with slightly different VLM training data, and between different training checkpoints of a single VLM.
Leveraging these results, we then demonstrate that transfer can be significantly improved against a specific target VLM by attacking larger ensembles of "highly-similar" VLMs.
These results stand in stark contrast to existing evidence of universal and transferable text jailbreaks against language models and transferable adversarial attacks against image classifiers, suggesting that VLMs may be more robust to gradient-based transfer attacks. Rylan Schaeffer, Dan Valentine, Luke Bailey, James Chua, Cristóbal Eyzaguirre, Zane Durante, Joe Benton, Brando Miranda, Henry Sleight, Tony T. Wang 0001, Rajashree Agrawal, Mrinank Sharma, Scott Emmons, Oluwasanmi Koyejo, Ethan Perez |
ICLR | 7 |
| 2024 | Nearly d-Linear Convergence Bounds for Diffusion Models via Stochastic LocalizationabstractDenoising diffusions are a powerful method to generate approximate samples from high-dimensional data distributions. Recent results provide polynomial bounds on their convergence rate, assuming $L^2$-accurate scores. Until now, the tightest bounds were either superlinear in the data dimension or required strong smoothness assumptions. We provide the first convergence bounds which are linear in the data dimension (up to logarithmic factors) assuming only finite second moments of the data distribution. We show that diffusion models require at most $\tilde O(\frac{d \log^2(1/\delta)}{\varepsilon^2})$ steps to approximate an arbitrary distribution on $\mathbb{R}^d$ corrupted with Gaussian noise of variance $\delta$ to within $\varepsilon^2$ in KL divergence. Our proof extends the Girsanov-based methods of previous works. We introduce a refined treatment of the error from discretizing the reverse SDE inspired by stochastic localization. Joe Benton, Valentin De Bortoli, Arnaud Doucet, George Deligiannidis |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Many-shot JailbreakingabstractWe investigate a family of simple long-context attacks on large language models: prompting with hundreds of demonstrations of undesirable behavior. This attack is newly feasible with the larger context windows recently deployed by language model providers like Google DeepMind, OpenAI and Anthropic. We find that in diverse, realistic circumstances, the effectiveness of this attack follows a power law, up to hundreds of shots. We demonstrate the success of this attack on the most widely used state-of-the-art closed-weight models, and across various tasks. Our results suggest very long contexts present a rich new attack surface for LLMs. Cem Anil, Esin Durmus, Nina Panickssery, Mrinank Sharma, Joe Benton, Sandipan Kundu, Joshua Batson, Meg Tong, Jesse Mu, Daniel Ford, Francesco Mosconi, Rajashree Agrawal, Rylan Schaeffer, Naomi Bashkansky, Samuel Svenningsen, Mike Lambert, Ansh Radhakrishnan, Carson Denison, Evan Hubinger, Yuntao Bai, Trenton Bricken, Timothy Maxwell, Nicholas Schiefer, James Sully, Alex Tamkin, Tamera Lanham, Karina Nguyen, Tomek Korbak, Jared Kaplan, Deep Ganguli, Samuel R. Bowman, Ethan Perez, Roger B. Grosse, David Duvenaud |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2023 | Alpha-divergence Variational Inference Meets Importance Weighted Auto-Encoders: Methodology and AsymptoticsabstractSeveral algorithms involving the Variational Rényi (VR) bound have been proposed to minimize an alpha-divergence between a target posterior distribution and a variational distribution. Despite promising empirical results, those algorithms resort to biased stochastic gradient descent procedures and thus lack theoretical guarantees. In this paper, we formalize and study the VR-IWAE bound, a generalization of the importance weighted auto-encoder (IWAE) bound. We show that the VR-IWAE bound enjoys several desirable properties and notably leads to the same stochastic gradient descent procedure as the VR bound in the reparameterized case, but this time by relying on unbiased gradient estimators. We then provide two complementary theoretical analyses of the VR-IWAE bound and thus of the standard IWAE bound. Those analyses shed light on the benefits or lack thereof of these bounds. Lastly, we illustrate our theoretical claims over toy and real-data examples. Kamélia Daudel, Joe Benton, Yuyang Shi 0002, Arnaud Doucet |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2022 | A Continuous Time Framework for Discrete Denoising ModelsabstractWe provide the first complete continuous time framework for denoising diffusion models of discrete data. This is achieved by formulating the forward noising process and corresponding reverse time generative process as Continuous Time Markov Chains (CTMCs). The model can be efficiently trained using a continuous time version of the ELBO. We simulate the high dimensional CTMC using techniques developed in chemical physics and exploit our continuous time framework to derive high performance samplers that we show can outperform discrete time methods for discrete data. The continuous time treatment also enables us to derive a novel theoretical result bounding the error between the generated sample distribution and the true data distribution. Joe Benton, Valentin De Bortoli, Tom Rainforth, George Deligiannidis, Arnaud Doucet |
NeurIPS | 2 |