VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew Peng
dblp:321/4158
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 91% Learning theory · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Minimax Optimal Online Imitation Learning via Replay Estimation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy evaluation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Minimax Optimal Online Imitation Learning via Replay Estimation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
online imitation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Minimax Optimal Online Imitation Learning via Replay Estimation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
minimax optimality |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Minimax Optimal Online Imitation Learning via Replay Estimation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
replay estimation · 0.6moment matching · 0.6function approximation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Minimax Optimal Online Imitation Learning via Replay EstimationabstractOnline imitation learning is the problem of how best to mimic expert demonstrations, given access to the environment or an accurate simulator. Prior work has shown that in the \textit{infinite} sample regime, exact moment matching achieves value equivalence to the expert policy. However, in the \textit{finite} sample regime, even if one has no optimization error, empirical variance can lead to a performance gap that scales with $H^2 / N_{\text{exp}}$ for behavioral cloning and $H / N_{\text{exp}}$ for online moment matching, where $H$ is the horizon and $N_{\text{exp}}$ is the size of the expert dataset. We introduce the technique of ``replay estimation'' to reduce this empirical variance: by repeatedly executing cached expert actions in a stochastic simulator, we compute a smoother expert visitation distribution estimate to match. In the presence of general function approximation, we prove a meta theorem reducing the performance gap of our approach to the \textit{parameter estimation error} for offline classification (i.e. learning the expert policy). In the tabular setting or with linear function approximation, our meta theorem shows that the performance gap incurred by our approach achieves the optimal $\widetilde{O} \left( \min( H^{3/2} / N_{\text{exp}}, H / \sqrt{N_{\text{exp}}} \right)$ dependency, under significantly weaker assumptions compared to prior work. We implement multiple instantiations of our approach on several continuous control tasks and find that we are able to significantly improve policy performance across a variety of dataset sizes. Gokul Swamy 0001, Nived Rajaraman, Matthew Peng, Sanjiban Choudhury, J. Andrew Bagnell, Steven Z. Wu, Jiantao Jiao, Kannan Ramchandran |
NeurIPS | 3 |