Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sebastian Konietzny

dblp:321/4499 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational photography and imaging · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
conditional GAN
0.712023
Learning Conditional Generative Models for Phase Retrieval · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Computational photography and imaging
phase retrieval
0.712023
Learning Conditional Generative Models for Phase Retrieval · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization-based reconstruction · 1.3conditional GAN · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A survey on self-supervised methods for visual representation learning
abstract
Abstract Learning meaningful representations is at the heart of many tasks in the field of modern machine learning. Recently, a lot of methods were introduced that allow learning of image representations without supervision. These representations can then be used in downstream tasks like classification or object detection. The quality of these representations is close to supervised learning, while no labeled images are needed. This survey paper provides a comprehensive review of these methods in a unified notation, points out similarities and differences of these methods, and proposes a taxonomy which sets these methods in relation to each other. Furthermore, our survey summarizes the most recent experimental results reported in the literature in form of a meta-study. Our survey is intended as a starting point for researchers and practitioners who want to dive into the field of representation learning.
Tobias Uelwer, Jan Robine, Stefan Sylvius Wagner, Marc Höftmann, Eric Upschulte, Sebastian Konietzny, Maike Behrendt, Stefan Harmeling
Mach. Learn.6
2023 Learning Conditional Generative Models for Phase Retrieval
abstract
Reconstructing images from magnitude measurements is an important and difficult problem arising in many research areas, such as X-ray crystallography, astronomical imaging and more. While optimization-based approaches often struggle with the non-convexity and non- linearity of the problem, learning-based approaches are able to produce reconstructions of high quality for data similar to a given training dataset. In this work, we analyze a class of methods based on conditional generative adversarial networks (CGAN). We show how the benefits of optimization-based and learning-based methods can be combined to improve reconstruction quality. Furthermore, we show that these combined methods are able to generalize to out-of-distribution data and analyze their robustness to measurement noise. In addition to that, we compare how the methods are impacted by missing measurements. Extensive ablation studies demonstrate that all components of our approach are essential and justify the choice of network architecture.
Tobias Uelwer, Sebastian Konietzny, Alexander Oberstraß, Stefan Harmeling
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2