Very relaxed concurrency memory models, like those of the Arm-A, RISC-V and IBM Power hardware architectures, underpin much of computing but break a fundamental intuition about programs, namely that syntactic program order and the reads-from relation always both induce order in the execution. Instead, out-of-order execution is allowed except where prevented by certain pairwise dependencies, barriers, or other synchronisation. This means that there is no notion of the ‘current’ state of the program, making it challenging to design (and prove sound) syntax-directed, modular reasoning methods like Hoare logics, as usable resources cannot implicitly flow from one program point to the next. We present AxSL, a family of separation logics for relaxed hardware memory models, and instantiate it on sequential consistency and on the Arm-A memory model. The Arm-A instance captures the fine-grained reasoning underpinning the low-overhead synchronisation idioms used by high-performance systems code. We mechanise AxSL in the Iris separation logic framework, illustrate it on key examples, and prove it sound with respect to the axiomatic memory model of Arm-A. By instantiating AxSL on different memory models, we demonstrate the generality of our approach, and show that it is largely generic in the axiomatic model and in the instruction-set semantics, offering a potential way forward for compositional reasoning for other models, and for the combination of production concurrency models and full-scale ISAs.

When designing new architectural security mechanisms, a key question is whether they actually provide the intended security, but this has historically been very hard to assess. One cannot gain much confidence by testing, as such mechanisms should provide protection in the presence of arbitrary unknown code. Previously, one also could not gain confidence by mechanised proof, as the scale of production instruction-set architecture (ISA) designs, many tens or hundreds of thousands of lines of specification, made that prohibitive. We focus in this paper especially on the secure encapsulation of software components, as supported by CHERI architectures in general and by the Arm Morello prototype architecture and hardware design in particular. Secure encapsulation is an essential security mechanism, for fault isolation and to constrain untrusted third-party code. It has previously often been implemented using virtual memory, but that does not scale to large numbers of compartments. Morello provides capability-based mechanisms that do scale, within a single address space. We prove a strong secure encapsulation property for an example of encapsulated code running on Morello, that holds in the presence of arbitrary untrusted code, above a full-scale sequential model of the Morello ISA. To do so, we build on, extend, and unify three orthogonal lines of previous work: the Cerise proof of such an encapsulation property for a highly idealised capability machine, expressed using a logical relation in Iris; the Islaris approach for reasoning about known code in production-scale ISAs; and the T-CHERI security properties of arbitrary Morello code, previously proved only for executions up to domain crossing. This demonstrates how one can prove such strong properties of security mechanisms for full-scale industry architectures.

Very relaxed concurrency memory models, like those of the Arm-A, RISC-V, and IBM Power hardware architectures, underpin much of computing but break a fundamental intuition about programs, namely that syntactic program order and the reads-from relation always both induce order in the execution. Instead, out-of-order execution is allowed except where prevented by certain pairwise dependencies, barriers, or other synchronisation. This means that there is no notion of the 'current' state of the program, making it challenging to design (and prove sound) syntax-directed, modular reasoning methods like Hoare logics, as usable resources cannot implicitly flow from one program point to the next. We present AxSL, a separation logic for the relaxed memory model of Arm-A, that captures the fine-grained reasoning underpinning the low-overhead synchronisation mechanisms used by high-performance systems code. In particular, AxSL allows transferring arbitrary resources using relaxed reads and writes when they induce inter-thread ordering. We mechanise AxSL in the Iris separation logic framework, illustrate it on key examples, and prove it sound with respect to the axiomatic memory model of Arm-A. Our approach is largely generic in the axiomatic model and in the instruction-set semantics, offering a potential way forward for compositional reasoning for other similar models, and for the combination of production concurrency models and full-scale ISAs.

Recent years have seen great advances towards verifying large-scale systems code. However, these verifications are usually based on hand-written assembly or machine-code semantics for the underlying architecture that only cover a small part of the instruction set architecture (ISA). In contrast, other recent work has used Sail to establish formal models for large real-world architectures, including Armv8-A and RISC-V, that are comprehensive (complete enough to boot an operating system or hypervisor) and authoritative (automatically derived from the Arm internal model and validated against the Arm validation suite, and adopted as the official formal specification by RISC-V International, respectively). But the scale and complexity of these models makes them challenging to use as a basis for verification.