Large language models (LLMs) can be effective at retrieval but are generally too expensive to use as first-stage rankers.As a consequence, several approaches to their use as rerankers of less expensive first-stage retrieval results have been suggested.Zhuang et al. recommend setwise approaches.In particular, they use heapsort to efficiently return top-ranked documents by obtaining a partial order from each LLM call.Utilizing rerankers requires setting parameters such as number of input documents, number of documents to be reranked, evaluation depth, number of tokens per document, and selection of LLM, all of which contribute to latency and effectiveness.In this work, we reproduce the batching and reranking of Zhuang et al. with a larger comparison window size.Furthermore, we determine that the document truncation used in the original implementation is suboptimal.By providing more context to the LLM, we show that the reranker is more effective than originally reported.

Most pretrained language models that support neural information retrieval are fine-tuned on the MS MARCO dataset.MS MARCO is expressed in English, so it naturally supports monolingual English retrieval.However, for Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLIR), no similar training data naturally exists that matches the languages of the query and the documents.The main ways to address this problem have been to continue to fine-tune with English data, or to translate MS MARCO queries and/or documents to match the CLIR setting.Machine translation often introduces errors that reduce retrieval effectiveness.It is usually easy to find target language documents suitable for training, but difficult to find naturally-occurring queries in the query language.An alternative is to train on naturally-occurring documents and syntheticallygenerated queries.Generate-Distill uses this approach with stateof-the-art distillation methods to match the effectiveness of training with translated MS MARCO across different domains.

Videos inherently contain multiple modalities, including visual events, text overlays, sounds, and speech, all of which are important for retrieval. However, state-of-the-art multimodal language models like VAST and LanguageBind are built on vision-language models (VLMs), and thus overly prioritize visual signals. Retrieval benchmarks further reinforce this bias by focusing on visual queries and neglecting other modalities. We create a search system MMMORRF that extracts text and features from both visual and audio modalities and integrates them with a novel modality-aware weighted reciprocal rank fusion. MMMORRF is both effective and efficient, demonstrating practicality in searching videos based on users' information needs instead of visual descriptive queries. We evaluate MMMORRF on MultiVENT 2.0 and TVR, two multimodal benchmarks designed for more targeted information needs, and find that it improves nDCG@20 by 81% over leading multimodal encoders and 37% over single-modality retrieval.

PLAID, an efficient implementation of the ColBERT late interaction bi-encoder using pretrained language models for ranking, consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance in monolingual, cross-language, and multilingual retrieval. PLAID differs from ColBERT by assigning terms to clusters and representing those terms as cluster centroids plus compressed residual vectors. While PLAID is effective in batch experiments, its performance degrades in streaming settings where documents arrive over time because representations of new tokens may be poorly modeled by the earlier tokens used to select cluster centroids. PLAID Streaming Hierarchical Indexing that Runs on Terabytes of Temporal Text (PLAID HIRTTT) addresses this concern using multi-phase incremental indexing based on hierarchical sharding. Experiments on ClueWeb09 and the multilingual NeuCLIR collection demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach both for the largest collection indexed to date by the ColBERT architecture and in the multilingual setting, respectively.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled new ways to satisfy information needs. Although great strides have been made in applying them to settings like document ranking and short-form text generation, they still struggle to compose complete, accurate, and verifiable long-form reports. Reports with these qualities are necessary to satisfy the complex, nuanced, or multi-faceted information needs of users. In this perspective paper, we draw together opinions from industry and academia, and from a variety of related research areas, to present our vision for automatic report generation, and---critically---a flexible framework by which such reports can be evaluated. In contrast with other summarization tasks, automatic report generation starts with a detailed description of an information need, stating the necessary background, requirements, and scope of the report. Further, the generated reports should be complete, accurate, and verifiable. These qualities, which are desirable---if not required---in many analytic report-writing settings, require rethinking how to build and evaluate systems that exhibit these qualities. To foster new efforts in building these systems, we present an evaluation framework that draws on ideas found in various evaluations. To test completeness and accuracy, the framework uses nuggets of information, expressed as questions and answers, that need to be part of any high-quality generated report. Additionally, evaluation of citations that map claims made in the report to their source documents ensures verifiability.