VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ziwei Du
dblp:321/6225
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-1278-8942ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 30% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 19% Graph learning · 19% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 76% Information retrieval · 15% Knowledge graphs · 9% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
table question answering |
2.7 | 3 | 2026 | CompTab: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Real-World TableQA with Complex Reasoning and Irregular Tables · ACL (1) 2026 Causality Meets the Table: Debiasing LLMs for Faithful TableQA via Front-Door Intervention · NeurIPS 2025 Triples as the Key: Structuring Makes Decomposition and Verification Easier in LLM-based TableQA · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causality Meets the Table: Debiasing LLMs for Faithful TableQA via Front-Door Intervention · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
debiasing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causality Meets the Table: Debiasing LLMs for Faithful TableQA via Front-Door Intervention · NeurIPS 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
front-door adjustment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causality Meets the Table: Debiasing LLMs for Faithful TableQA via Front-Door Intervention · NeurIPS 2025 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › network embedding
attributed network embedding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Hierarchical Representation Learning for Attributed Networks · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023 |
Data mining › representation learning
graph representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Hierarchical Representation Learning for Attributed Networks · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › network embedding
attributed network embedding |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Hierarchical Representation Learning for Attributed Networks · ICDE 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Hierarchical Representation Learning for Attributed Networks · ICDE 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Hierarchical Representation Learning for Attributed Networks · ICDE 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › hierarchical representation
hierarchical representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Hierarchical Representation Learning for Attributed Networks · ICDE 2022 |
Information retrieval › search engines › structured data search
table retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | CompTab: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Real-World TableQA with Complex Reasoning and Irregular Tables · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Triples as the Key: Structuring Makes Decomposition and Verification Easier in LLM-based TableQA · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Causality Meets the Table: Debiasing LLMs for Faithful TableQA via Front-Door Intervention · NeurIPS 2025 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph simplification
graph coarsening |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Hierarchical Representation Learning for Attributed Networks · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023 |
Knowledge graphs
link prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Hierarchical Representation Learning for Attributed Networks · ICDE 2022 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › graph learning
node classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Hierarchical Representation Learning for Attributed Networks · ICDE 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
complex reasoning · 2.0benchmark construction · 2.0hierarchical granulation · 1.3graph embedding · 1.3network embedding · 1.1hierarchical representation learning · 1.1structural causal model · 0.9prompt engineering · 0.9large language model · 0.9front-door adjustment · 0.9agent · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CompTab: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Real-World TableQA with Complex Reasoning and Irregular TablesabstractZhen Yang, Wei Du, Jie Wang, Wenze Zhou, Xiangfeng Meng, Zhengyang Wang, Suping Sun, Ziwei Du, Haodong Zou, Jie Chen, Yongbin Liu, Shicheng Tan, Jiahao Ying, Shu Zhao. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Zhen Yang 0010, Wenze Zhou, Xiangfeng Meng, Suping Sun, Ziwei Du, Haodong Zou, Jie Chen 0025, Shicheng Tan, Jiahao Ying, Shu Zhao 0005 |
ACL (1) | 8 |
| 2025 | Triples as the Key: Structuring Makes Decomposition and Verification Easier in LLM-based TableQAabstractAs the mainstream approach, LLMs have been widely applied and researched in TableQA tasks. Currently, the core of LLM-based TableQA methods typically include three phases: question decomposition, sub-question TableQA reasoning, and answer verification. However, several challenges remain in this process: i) Sub-questions generated by these methods often exhibit significant gaps with the original question due to critical information overlooked during the LLM's direct decomposition; ii) Verification of answers is typically challenging because LLMs tend to generate optimal responses during self-correct. To address these challenges, we propose a Triple-Inspired Decomposition and vErification (TIDE) strategy, which leverages the structural properties of triples to assist in decomposition and verification in TableQA. The inherent structure of triples (head entity, relation, tail entity) requires the LLM to extract as many entities and relations from the question as possible. Unlike direct decomposition methods that may overlook key information, our transformed sub-questions using triples encompass more critical details. Additionally, this explicit structure facilitates verification. By comparing the triples derived from the answers with those from the question decomposition, we can achieve easier and more straightforward validation than when relying on the LLM's self-correct tendencies. By employing triples alongside established LLM modes, Direct Prompting and Agent modes, TIDE achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple TableQA datasets, demonstrating the effectiveness of our method. Zhen Yang 0010, Ziwei Du, Minghan Zhang, Jie Chen 0025, Zhen Duan, Shu Zhao 0005 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Causality Meets the Table: Debiasing LLMs for Faithful TableQA via Front-Door InterventionabstractTable Question Answering (TableQA) combines natural language understanding and structured data reasoning, posing challenges in semantic interpretation and logical inference. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have improved TableQA performance through Direct Prompting and Agent paradigms. However, these models often rely on spurious correlations, as they tend to overfit to token co-occurrence patterns in pretraining corpora, rather than perform genuine reasoning. To address this issue, we propose Causal Intervention TableQA (CIT), which is based on a structural causal graph and applies front-door adjustment to eliminate bias caused by token co-occurrence. CIT formalizes TableQA as a causal graph and identifies token co-occurrence patterns as confounders. By applying front-door adjustment, CIT guides question variant generation and reasoning to reduce confounding effects. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that CIT achieves state-of-the-art performance, demonstrating its effectiveness in mitigating bias. Consistent gains across various LLMs further confirm its generalizability. Zhen Yang 0010, Ziwei Du, Minghan Zhang, Jie Chen 0025, Fulan Qian, Shu Zhao 0005 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2025 | Graph contrastive learning via coarsening: A time and memory efficient approach
Ziwei Du, Zhen Yang 0010, Jie Chen 0025, Zhen Duan, Shu Zhao 0005 |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 1 |
| 2025 | HireGC: Hierarchical inductive network representation learning via graph coarsening
Shu Zhao 0005, Ci Xu, Ziwei Du, Yanping Zhang 0001, Zhen Duan, Jie Chen 0025 |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 3 |
| 2023 | A Black-Box Adversarial Attack Method via Nesterov Accelerated Gradient and Rewiring Towards Attacking Graph Neural NetworksabstractRecent studies have shown that Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are vulnerable to well-designed and imperceptible adversarial attack. Attacks utilizing gradient information are widely used in the field of attack due to their simplicity and efficiency. However, several challenges are faced by gradient-based attacks: 1) Generate perturbations use white-box attacks (i.e., requiring access to the full knowledge of the model), which is not practical in the real world; 2) It is easy to drop into local optima; and 3) The perturbation budget is not limited and might be detected even if the number of modified edges is small. Faced with the above challenges, this article proposes a black-box adversarial attack method, named NAG-R, which consists of two modules known asNesterovAcceleratedGradient attack module andRewiring optimization module. Specifically, inspired by adversarial attacks on images, the first module generates perturbations by introducing Nesterov Accelerated Gradient (NAG) to avoid falling into local optima. The second module keeps the fundamental properties of the graph (e.g., the total degree of the graph) unchanged through a rewiring operation, thus ensuring that perturbations are imperceptible. Intensive experiments show that our method has significant attack success and transferability over existing state-of-the-art gradient-based attack methods. Shu Zhao 0005, Ziwei Du, Jie Chen 0025, Zhen Duan |
IEEE Trans. Big Data | 3 |
| 2023 | Hierarchical Representation Learning for Attributed NetworksabstractNetwork representation learning, also called network embedding, aiming to learn low dimensional vectors for nodes while preserving essential properties of the network, benefits plenty of practical applications. However, how to do representation learning on the network quickly and effectively is a meaningful and challenging task, especially for the attributed networks. In this paper, we propose HANE, a Hierarchical Attributed Network Embedding framework, which is a fast and effective method by quickly constructing a hierarchical attributed network of different granularities to learn nodes representations. Specifically, for an attributed network, HANE first builds a hierarchy of successively smaller attributed network from fine to coarse by the fast granulation strategy fusing topological structure and node attributes. After using any unsupervised network embedding method to learn nodes representations of the coarsest network, HANE refines the nodes representations of the hierarchical attributed network from coarse to fine. HANE improves the speed of network representation learning while maintaining its performance and the representation learning method of the coarsest network is flexible. We conduct extensive evaluations for the proposed framework HANE on six datasets and two benchmark applications. Experimental results demonstrate that HANE achieves significant improvements over previous state-of-the-art network embedding methods in efficiency and effectiveness. Shu Zhao 0005, Ziwei Du, Jie Chen 0025, Yanping Zhang 0001, Jie Tang 0001, Philip S. Yu |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 2 |
| 2022 | Hierarchical Representation Learning for Attributed NetworksabstractNetwork representation learning, also called network embedding, aiming to learn low dimensional vectors for nodes while preserving essential properties of the network, such as structural similarity, attribute similarity, etc. The low-dimensional vector of the node can be used as the input of the machine learning algorithm and applied to a lot of downstream tasks, such as node classification and link prediction, benefits plenty of practical applications. Shu Zhao 0005, Ziwei Du, Jie Chen 0025, Yanping Zhang 0001, Jie Tang 0001, Philip S. Yu |
ICDE | 2 |