Marcello Massimo Negri

dblp:322/0057 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Generative modeling · 58% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 42%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
1.522025
Injective flows for star-like manifolds · ICLR 2025
Conditional Matrix Flows for Gaussian Graphical Models · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.922025
Conditional Matrix Flows for Gaussian Graphical Models · NeurIPS 2023
Injective flows for star-like manifolds · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
injective flow
0.912025
Injective flows for star-like manifolds · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
continuous normalizing flow
0.812024
Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws · ICLR 2024
Computational science and engineering
fluid dynamics
0.812024
Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
gaussian graphical model
0.712023
Conditional Matrix Flows for Gaussian Graphical Models · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › gaussian graphical model
sparse precision matrix estimation
0.712023
Conditional Matrix Flows for Gaussian Graphical Models · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

diffeomorphism · 1.5continuity equation · 1.5simulated annealing · 0.7matrix-variate normalizing flow · 0.7MAP estimation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Injective flows for star-like manifolds
abstract
Normalizing Flows (NFs) are powerful and efficient models for density estimation. When modeling densities on manifolds, NFs can be generalized to injective flows but the Jacobian determinant becomes computationally prohibitive. Current approaches either consider bounds on the log-likelihood or rely on some approximations of the Jacobian determinant. In contrast, we propose injective flows for star-like manifolds and show that for such manifolds we can compute the Jacobian determinant exactly and efficiently. This aspect is particularly relevant for variational inference settings, where no samples are available and only some unnormalized target is known. Among many, we showcase the relevance of modeling densities on star-like manifolds in two settings. Firstly, we introduce a novel Objective Bayesian approach for penalized likelihood models by interpreting level-sets of the penalty as star-like manifolds. Secondly, we consider probabilistic mixing models and introduce a general method for variational inference by defining the posterior of mixture weights on the probability simplex.
Marcello Massimo Negri, Jonathan Aellen, Volker Roth 0001
ICLR1
2024 Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws
abstract
We introduce Lagrangian Flow Networks (LFlows) for modeling fluid densities and velocities continuously in space and time. By construction, the proposed LFlows satisfy the continuity equation, a PDE describing mass conservation in its differential form. Our model is based on the insight that solutions to the continuity equation can be expressed as time-dependent density transformations via differentiable and invertible maps. This follows from classical theory of the existence and uniqueness of Lagrangian flows for smooth vector fields. Hence, we model fluid densities by transforming a base density with parameterized diffeomorphisms conditioned on time. The key benefit compared to methods relying on numerical ODE solvers or PINNs is that the analytic expression of the velocity is always consistent with changes in density. Furthermore, we require neither expensive numerical solvers, nor additional penalties to enforce the PDE. LFlows show higher predictive accuracy in density modeling tasks compared to competing models in 2D and 3D, while being computationally efficient. As a real-world application, we model bird migration based on sparse weather radar measurements.
Fabricio Arend Torres, Marcello Massimo Negri, Marco Inversi, Jonathan Aellen, Volker Roth 0001
ICLR2
2023 Conditional Matrix Flows for Gaussian Graphical Models
abstract
Studying conditional independence among many variables with few observations is a challenging task. Gaussian Graphical Models (GGMs) tackle this problem by encouraging sparsity in the precision matrix through $l_q$ regularization with $q\leq1$. However, most GMMs rely on the $l_1$ norm because the objective is highly non-convex for sub-$l_1$ pseudo-norms. In the frequentist formulation, the $l_1$ norm relaxation provides the solution path as a function of the shrinkage parameter $\lambda$. In the Bayesian formulation, sparsity is instead encouraged through a Laplace prior, but posterior inference for different $\lambda$ requires repeated runs of expensive Gibbs samplers. Here we propose a general framework for variational inference with matrix-variate Normalizing Flow in GGMs, which unifies the benefits of frequentist and Bayesian frameworks. As a key improvement on previous work, we train with one flow a continuum of sparse regression models jointly for all regularization parameters $\lambda$ and all $l_q$ norms, including non-convex sub-$l_1$ pseudo-norms. Within one model we thus have access to (i) the evolution of the posterior for any $\lambda$ and any $l_q$ (pseudo-) norm, (ii) the marginal log-likelihood for model selection, and (iii) the frequentist solution paths through simulated annealing in the MAP limit.
Marcello Massimo Negri, Fabricio Arend Torres, Volker Roth 0001
NeurIPS1