Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chiyu Ma

dblp:322/1731 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 47% Language models and text generation · 12% Image recognition and object detection · 9%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
3.042025
ProtoPairNet: Interpretable Regression through Prototypical Pair Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025
Achieving Domain-Independent Certified Robustness via Knowledge Continuity · NeurIPS 2024
Interpretable Image Classification with Adaptive Prototype-based Vision Transformers · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
1.422024
Interpretable Image Classification with Adaptive Prototype-based Vision Transformers · NeurIPS 2024
This Looks Like Those: Illuminating Prototypical Concepts Using Multiple Visualizations · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
interpretable image classification
1.422024
Interpretable Image Classification with Adaptive Prototype-based Vision Transformers · NeurIPS 2024
This Looks Like Those: Illuminating Prototypical Concepts Using Multiple Visualizations · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning
1.012026
What Makes a Good Curriculum? Disentangling the Effects of Data Ordering on LLM Mathematical Reasoning · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning
1.012026
What Makes a Good Curriculum? Disentangling the Effects of Data Ordering on LLM Mathematical Reasoning · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
audio-language model
0.912025
SoundMind: RL-Incentivized Logic Reasoning for Audio-Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
interpretable regression
0.912025
ProtoPairNet: Interpretable Regression through Prototypical Pair Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multimodal language model
0.912025
SoundMind: RL-Incentivized Logic Reasoning for Audio-Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › prototype-based classification
prototypical network
0.912025
ProtoPairNet: Interpretable Regression through Prototypical Pair Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression
0.912025
ProtoPairNet: Interpretable Regression through Prototypical Pair Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for reasoning
0.912025
SoundMind: RL-Incentivized Logic Reasoning for Audio-Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness
0.812024
Achieving Domain-Independent Certified Robustness via Knowledge Continuity · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › example-based explanation
prototype-based explanation
0.812024
Interpretable Image Classification with Adaptive Prototype-based Vision Transformers · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
Achieving Domain-Independent Certified Robustness via Knowledge Continuity · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data-centric deep learning
training data ordering
0.312026
What Makes a Good Curriculum? Disentangling the Effects of Data Ordering on LLM Mathematical Reasoning · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
continuous control
0.312025
ProtoPairNet: Interpretable Regression through Prototypical Pair Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

case-based reasoning · 2.3reinforcement learning · 0.9geometric interpretation · 0.9vision transformer · 0.8regularization · 0.8lipschitz continuity · 0.8certification algorithm · 0.8prototypical parts · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 What Makes a Good Curriculum? Disentangling the Effects of Data Ordering on LLM Mathematical Reasoning
abstract
Yaning Jia, Chunhui Zhang, Xingjian Diao, Xiangchi Yuan, Zhongyu Ouyang, Chiyu Ma, Soroush Vosoughi. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Yaning Jia, Xingjian Diao, Xiangchi Yuan, Zhongyu Ouyang, Chiyu Ma, Soroush Vosoughi
ACL (1)6
2025 SoundMind: RL-Incentivized Logic Reasoning for Audio-Language Models
abstract
Xingjian Diao, Chunhui Zhang, Keyi Kong, Weiyi Wu, Chiyu Ma, Zhongyu Ouyang, Peijun Qing, Soroush Vosoughi, Jiang Gui. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Xingjian Diao, Keyi Kong, Weiyi Wu, Chiyu Ma, Zhongyu Ouyang, Peijun Qing, Soroush Vosoughi, Jiang Gui
EMNLP5
2025 ProtoPairNet: Interpretable Regression through Prototypical Pair Reasoning
abstract
We present Prototypical Pair Network (ProtoPairNet), a novel interpretable architecture that combines deep learning with case-based reasoning to predict continuous targets. While prototype-based models have primarily addressed image classification with discrete outputs, extending these methods to continuous targets, such as regression, poses significant challenges. Existing architectures which rely heavily on one-to-one comparison with prototypes lack the directional information necessary for continuous predictions. Our method redefines the role of prototypes in such tasks by incorporating prototypical pairs into the reasoning process. Predictions are derived based on the input's relative dissimilarities to these pairs, leveraging an intuitive geometric interpretation. Our method further reduces the complexity of the reasoning process by relying on the single most relevant pair of prototypes, rather than all prototypes in the model as was done in prior works. Our model is versatile enough to be used in both vision-based regression and continuous control in reinforcement learning. Our experiments demonstrate that ProtoPairNet achieves performance on par with its black-box counterparts across these tasks. Comprehensive analyses confirm the meaningfulness of prototypical pairs and the faithfulness of our model’s interpretations, and extensive user studies highlight our model's improved interpretability over existing methods.
Rose Gurung, Ronilo J. Ragodos, Chiyu Ma, Tong Wang 0011
NeurIPS3
2024 Interpretable Image Classification with Adaptive Prototype-based Vision Transformers
abstract
We present ProtoViT, a method for interpretable image classification combining deep learning and case-based reasoning. This method classifies an image by comparing it to a set of learned prototypes, providing explanations of the form ``this looks like that.'' In our model, a prototype consists of **parts**, which can deform over irregular geometries to create a better comparison between images. Unlike existing models that rely on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) backbones and spatially rigid prototypes, our model integrates Vision Transformer (ViT) backbones into prototype based models, while offering spatially deformed prototypes that not only accommodate geometric variations of objects but also provide coherent and clear prototypical feature representations with an adaptive number of prototypical parts. Our experiments show that our model can generally achieve higher performance than the existing prototype based models. Our comprehensive analyses ensure that the prototypes are consistent and the interpretations are faithful.
Chiyu Ma, Jon Donnelly, Soroush Vosoughi, Cynthia Rudin
NeurIPS1
2024 Achieving Domain-Independent Certified Robustness via Knowledge Continuity
abstract
We present *knowledge continuity*, a novel definition inspired by Lipschitz continuity which aims to certify the robustness of neural networks across input domains (such as continuous and discrete domains in vision and language, respectively). Most existing approaches that seek to certify robustness, especially Lipschitz continuity, lie within the continuous domain with norm and distribution-dependent guarantees. In contrast, our proposed definition yields certification guarantees that depend only on the loss function and the intermediate learned metric spaces of the neural network. These bounds are independent of domain modality, norms, and distribution. We further demonstrate that the expressiveness of a model class is not at odds with its knowledge continuity. This implies that achieving robustness by maximizing knowledge continuity should not theoretically hinder inferential performance. Finally, to complement our theoretical results, we present several applications of knowledge continuity such as regularization, a certification algorithm, and show that knowledge continuity can be used to localize vulnerable components of a neural network.
Alan Sun, Chiyu Ma, Kenneth Ge, Soroush Vosoughi
NeurIPS2
2023 This Looks Like Those: Illuminating Prototypical Concepts Using Multiple Visualizations
abstract
We present ProtoConcepts, a method for interpretable image classification combining deep learning and case-based reasoning using prototypical parts. Existing work in prototype-based image classification uses a "this looks like that'' reasoning process, which dissects a test image by finding prototypical parts and combining evidence from these prototypes to make a final classification. However, all of the existing prototypical part-based image classifiers provide only one-to-one comparisons, where a single training image patch serves as a prototype to compare with a part of our test image. With these single-image comparisons, it can often be difficult to identify the underlying concept being compared (e.g., "is it comparing the color or the shape?''). Our proposed method modifies the architecture of prototype-based networks to instead learn prototypical concepts which are visualized using multiple image patches. Having multiple visualizations of the same prototype allows us to more easily identify the concept captured by that prototype (e.g., "the test image and the related training patches are all the same shade of blue''), and allows our model to create richer, more interpretable visual explanations. Our experiments show that our ``this looks like those'' reasoning process can be applied as a modification to a wide range of existing prototypical image classification networks while achieving comparable accuracy on benchmark datasets.
Chiyu Ma, Brandon Zhao, Cynthia Rudin
NeurIPS1