VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maizhen Ning
dblp:322/2436
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8842-4187ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 34% Vision and language · 23% Question answering and dialogue systems · 16% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › spatial reasoning
geometry problem solving |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | GNS: Solving Plane Geometry Problems by Neural-Symbolic Reasoning with Multi-Modal LLMs · AAAI 2025 A Symbolic Characters Aware Model for Solving Geometry Problems · ACM Multimedia 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
math word problem solving |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | GNS: Solving Plane Geometry Problems by Neural-Symbolic Reasoning with Multi-Modal LLMs · AAAI 2025 A Symbolic Characters Aware Model for Solving Geometry Problems · ACM Multimedia 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Is Your Model Really A Good Math Reasoner? Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning with Checklist · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GNS: Solving Plane Geometry Problems by Neural-Symbolic Reasoning with Multi-Modal LLMs · AAAI 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GNS: Solving Plane Geometry Problems by Neural-Symbolic Reasoning with Multi-Modal LLMs · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Is Your Model Really A Good Math Reasoner? Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning with Checklist · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic-based reasoning
symbolic reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GNS: Solving Plane Geometry Problems by Neural-Symbolic Reasoning with Multi-Modal LLMs · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › generalization in reinforcement learning
task generalization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Is Your Model Really A Good Math Reasoner? Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning with Checklist · ICLR 2025 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › document image restoration
document dewarping |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DvD: Unleashing a Generative Paradigm for Document Dewarping via Coordinates-based Diffusion Model · SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DvD: Unleashing a Generative Paradigm for Document Dewarping via Coordinates-based Diffusion Model · SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
diagram understanding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Symbolic Characters Aware Model for Solving Geometry Problems · ACM Multimedia 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Symbolic Characters Aware Model for Solving Geometry Problems · ACM Multimedia 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symbolic solver · 0.9neural-symbolic reasoning · 0.9multimodal LLM · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9coordinate-level denoising · 0.9checklist-based evaluation · 0.9automatic checklist generation · 0.9self-supervised learning · 0.7masked image modeling · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | GNS: Solving Plane Geometry Problems by Neural-Symbolic Reasoning with Multi-Modal LLMsabstractWith the outstanding capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), solving math word problems (MWP) has greatly progressed, achieving higher performance on several benchmark datasets. However, it is more challenging to solve plane geometry problems (PGPs) due to the necessity of understanding, reasoning and computation on two modality data including both geometry diagrams and textual questions, where Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have not been extensively explored. Previous works simply regarded a plane geometry problem as multi-modal QA task, which ignored the importance of explicit parsing geometric elements from problems. To tackle this limitation, we propose to solve plane Geometry problems by Neural-Symbolic reasoning with MLLMs (GNS). We first leverage an MLLM to understand PGPs through knowledge prediction and symbolic parsing, next perform mathematical reasoning to obtain solutions, last adopt a symbolic solver to compute answers. Correspondingly, we introduce the largest PGPs dataset GNS-260K with multiple annotations including symbolic parsing, understanding, reasoning and computation. In experiments, our Phi3-Vision-based MLLM wins the first place on the PGPs solving task of MathVista benchmark, outperforming GPT-4o, Gemini Ultra and other much larger MLLMs. While LLaVA-13B-based MLLM markedly exceeded other close-source and open-source MLLMs on the MathVerse benchmark and also achieved the new SOTA on GeoQA dataset. Maizhen Ning, Qiufeng Wang 0001, Xiaowei Huang 0001, Kaizhu Huang |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Is Your Model Really A Good Math Reasoner? Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning with ChecklistabstractExceptional mathematical reasoning ability is one of the key features that demonstrate the power of large language models (LLMs). How to comprehensively define and evaluate the mathematical abilities of LLMs, and even reflect the user experience in real-world scenarios, has emerged as a critical issue. Current benchmarks predominantly concentrate on problem-solving capabilities, presenting a substantial risk of model overfitting and fails to accurately measure the genuine mathematical reasoning abilities. In this paper, we argue that if a model really understands a problem, it should be robustly and readily applied across a diverse array of tasks. To this end, we introduce MathCheck, a well-designed checklist for testing task generalization and reasoning robustness, as well as an automatic tool to generate checklists efficiently. MathCheck includes multiple mathematical reasoning tasks and robustness tests to facilitate a comprehensive evaluation of both mathematical reasoning ability and behavior testing. Utilizing MathCheck, we develop MathCheck-GSM and MathCheck-GEO to assess mathematical textual reasoning and multi-modal reasoning capabilities, respectively, serving as upgraded versions of benchmarks including GSM8k, GeoQA, UniGeo, and Geometry3K. We adopt MathCheck-GSM and MathCheck-GEO to evaluate over 26 LLMs and 17 multi-modal LLMs, assessing their comprehensive mathematical reasoning abilities. Our results demonstrate that while frontier LLMs like GPT-4o continue to excel in various abilities on the checklist, many other model families exhibit a significant decline. Further experiments indicate that, compared to traditional math benchmarks, MathCheck better reflects true mathematical abilities and represents mathematical intelligence more linearly, thereby supporting our design. Using MathCheck, we can also efficiently conduct informative behavior analysis to deeply investigate models. Finally, we show that our proposed checklist paradigm can easily extend to other reasoning tasks for their comprehensive evaluation. Shudong Liu 0004, Maizhen Ning, Wei Liu 0131, Jindong Wang 0001, Derek F. Wong, Xiaowei Huang 0001, Qiufeng Wang 0001, Kaizhu Huang |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2025 | DvD: Unleashing a Generative Paradigm for Document Dewarping via Coordinates-based Diffusion ModelabstractDocument dewarping aims to rectify deformations in photographic document images, thus improving text readability, which has attracted much attention and made great progress, but it is still challenging to preserve document structures. Given recent advances in diffusion models, it is natural for us to consider their potential applicability to document dewarping. However, it is far from straightforward to adopt diffusion models in document dewarping due to their unfaithful control on highly complex document images (e.g., 2000 × 3000 resolution). In this paper, we propose DvD, the first generative model to tackle document Dewarping via a Diffusion framework. To be specific, DvD introduces a coordinate-level denoising instead of typical pixel-level denoising, generating a mapping for deformation rectification. In addition, we further propose a time-variant condition refinement mechanism to enhance the preservation of document structures. In experiments, we find that current document dewarping benchmarks can not evaluate dewarping models comprehensively. To this end, we present AnyPhotoDoc6300, a rigorously designed large-scale document dewarping benchmark comprising 6,300 real image pairs across three distinct domains, enabling fine-grained evaluation of dewarping models. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed DvD can achieve state-of-the-art performance with acceptable computational efficiency on multiple metrics across various benchmarks, including DocUNet, DIR300, and AnyPhotoDoc6300. The new benchmark and code will be publicly available at https://github.com/hanquansanren/DvD. Huangcheng Lu, Maizhen Ning, Xiaowei Huang 0001, Wei Wang 0042, Kaizhu Huang, Qiufeng Wang 0001 |
SIGGRAPH Asia | 3 |
| 2023 | A Symbolic Characters Aware Model for Solving Geometry ProblemsabstractAI has made significant progress in solving math problems, but geometry problems remain challenging due to their reliance on both text and diagrams. In the text description, symbolic characters such as "ABC" often serve as a bridge to connect the corresponding diagram. However, by simply tokenizing symbolic characters into individual letters (e.g., 'A', 'B' and 'C'), existing works fail to study them explicitly and thus lose the semantic relationship with the diagram. In this paper, we develop a symbolic character-aware model to fully explore the role of these characters in both text and diagram understanding and optimize the model under a multi-modal reasoning framework. In the text encoder, we propose merging individual symbolic characters to form one semantic unit along with geometric information from the corresponding diagram. For the diagram encoder, we pre-train it under a multi-label classification framework with the symbolic characters as labels. In addition, we enhance the geometry diagram understanding ability via a self-supervised learning method under the masked image modeling auxiliary task. By integrating the proposed model into a general encoder-decoder pipeline for solving geometry problems, we demonstrate its superiority on two benchmark datasets, including GeoQA and Geometry3K, with extensive experiments. Specifically, on GeoQA, the question-solving accuracy is increased from 60.0% to 64.1%, achieving a new state-of-the-art accuracy; on Geometry3K, we reduce the question average solving steps from 6.9 down to 6.0 with marginally higher solving accuracy. Maizhen Ning, Qiufeng Wang 0001, Kaizhu Huang, Xiaowei Huang 0001 |
ACM Multimedia | 1 |
| 2021 | A Segment-Based Layout Aware Model for Information Extraction on Document Images
Maizhen Ning, Qiufeng Wang 0001, Kaizhu Huang, Xiaowei Huang 0001 |
ICONIP (5) | 1 |