Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alireza Fathollah Pour

dblp:322/4092 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 77% Deep learning architectures and training · 19% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 4%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
1.422024
Sample-Optimal Locally Private Hypothesis Selection and the Provable Benefits of Interactivity · COLT 2024
On the Role of Noise in the Sample Complexity of Learning Recurrent Neural Networks: Exponential Gaps for Long Sequences · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › distribution learning
hypothesis selection
0.812024
Sample-Optimal Locally Private Hypothesis Selection and the Provable Benefits of Interactivity · COLT 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation
0.812024
Sample-Optimal Locally Private Hypothesis Selection and the Provable Benefits of Interactivity · COLT 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy
0.812024
Sample-Optimal Locally Private Hypothesis Selection and the Provable Benefits of Interactivity · COLT 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › private statistical estimation
private hypothesis selection
0.812024
Sample-Optimal Locally Private Hypothesis Selection and the Provable Benefits of Interactivity · COLT 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
recurrent neural network training
0.712023
On the Role of Noise in the Sample Complexity of Learning Recurrent Neural Networks: Exponential Gaps for Long Sequences · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
capacity control
0.612022
Benefits of Additive Noise in Composing Classes with Bounded Capacity · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
neural network integration
0.212022
Benefits of Additive Noise in Composing Classes with Bounded Capacity · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

critical queries · 1.5statistical query algorithms · 0.8statistical query algorithm · 0.8noise injection · 0.7PAC learning · 0.7uniform covering number · 0.6gaussian noise injection · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Sample-Optimal Locally Private Hypothesis Selection and the Provable Benefits of Interactivity
abstract
We study the problem of hypothesis selection under the constraint of local differential privacy. Given a class $\mathcal{F}$ of $k$ distributions and a set of i.i.d. samples from an unknown distribution $h$, the goal of hypothesis selection is to pick a distribution $\hat{f}$ whose total variation distance to $h$ is comparable with the best distribution in $\mathcal{F}$ (with high probability). We devise an $\varepsilon$-locally-differentially-private ($\varepsilon$-LDP) algorithm that uses $\Theta\left(\frac{k}{\alpha^2\min \{\varepsilon^2,1\}}\right)$ samples to guarantee that $d_{TV}(h,\hat{f})\leq \alpha + 9 \min_{f\in \mathcal{F}}d_{TV}(h,f)$ with high probability. This sample complexity is optimal for $varepsilon<1$, matching the lower bound of Gopi et al. (2020). All previously known algorithms for this problem required $\Omega\left(\frac{k\log k}{\alpha^2\min \{\varepsilon^2 ,1\}} \right)$ samples to work. Moreover, our result demonstrates the power of interaction for $\varepsilon$-LDP hypothesis selection. Namely, it breaks the known lower bound of $\Omega\left(\frac{k\log k}{\alpha^2 \varepsilon^2} \right)$ for the sample complexity of non-interactive hypothesis selection. Our algorithm achieves this using only $\Theta(\log \log k)$ rounds of interaction. To prove our results, we define the notion of \emph{critical queries} for a Statistical Query Algorithm (SQA) which may be of independent interest. Informally, an SQA is said to use a small number of critical queries if its success relies on the accuracy of only a small number of queries it asks. We then design an LDP algorithm that uses a smaller number of critical queries.
Alireza Fathollah Pour, Hassan Ashtiani, Shahab Asoodeh
COLT1
2023 On the Role of Noise in the Sample Complexity of Learning Recurrent Neural Networks: Exponential Gaps for Long Sequences
abstract
We consider the class of noisy multi-layered sigmoid recurrent neural networks with $w$ (unbounded) weights for classification of sequences of length $T$, where independent noise distributed according to $\mathcal{N}(0,\sigma^2)$ is added to the output of each neuron in the network. Our main result shows that the sample complexity of PAC learning this class can be bounded by $O (w\log(T/\sigma))$. For the non-noisy version of the same class (i.e., $\sigma=0$), we prove a lower bound of $\Omega (wT)$ for the sample complexity. Our results indicate an exponential gap in the dependence of sample complexity on $T$ for noisy versus non-noisy networks. Moreover, given the mild logarithmic dependence of the upper bound on $1/\sigma$, this gap still holds even for numerically negligible values of $\sigma$.
Alireza Fathollah Pour, Hassan Ashtiani
NeurIPS1
2022 Benefits of Additive Noise in Composing Classes with Bounded Capacity
abstract
We observe that given two (compatible) classes of functions $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{H}$ with small capacity as measured by their uniform covering numbers, the capacity of the composition class $\mathcal{H} \circ \mathcal{F}$ can become prohibitively large or even unbounded. We then show that adding a small amount of Gaussian noise to the output of $\mathcal{F}$ before composing it with $\mathcal{H}$ can effectively control the capacity of $\mathcal{H} \circ \mathcal{F}$, offering a general recipe for modular design. To prove our results, we define new notions of uniform covering number of random functions with respect to the total variation and Wasserstein distances. We instantiate our results for the case of multi-layer sigmoid neural networks. Preliminary empirical results on MNIST dataset indicate that the amount of noise required to improve over existing uniform bounds can be numerically negligible (i.e., element-wise i.i.d. Gaussian noise with standard deviation $10^{-240}$)
Alireza Fathollah Pour, Hassan Ashtiani
NeurIPS1