Gleb Bazhenov

dblp:322/8649 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Graph learning · 68% Trustworthy machine learning · 32%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
1.522025
GraphLand: Evaluating Graph Machine Learning Models on Diverse Industrial Data · NeurIPS 2025
Evaluating Robustness and Uncertainty of Graph Models Under Structural Distributional Shifts · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph foundation model
0.912025
GraphLand: Evaluating Graph Machine Learning Models on Diverse Industrial Data · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node prediction
0.912025
GraphLand: Evaluating Graph Machine Learning Models on Diverse Industrial Data · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
distributional shift
0.712023
Evaluating Robustness and Uncertainty of Graph Models Under Structural Distributional Shifts · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
Evaluating Robustness and Uncertainty of Graph Models Under Structural Distributional Shifts · NeurIPS 2023
Data mining › predictive modeling › tree-based models
gradient boosting decision tree
0.312025
GraphLand: Evaluating Graph Machine Learning Models on Diverse Industrial Data · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.212023
Evaluating Robustness and Uncertainty of Graph Models Under Structural Distributional Shifts · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph-based feature engineering · 1.7gradient-boosted decision trees · 0.9gradient boosted decision trees · 0.9structural shift induction · 0.7representation quality evaluation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 GraphLand: Evaluating Graph Machine Learning Models on Diverse Industrial Data
abstract
Although data that can be naturally represented as graphs is widespread in real-world applications across diverse industries, popular graph ML benchmarks for node property prediction only cover a surprisingly narrow set of data domains, and graph neural networks (GNNs) are often evaluated on just a few academic citation networks. This issue is particularly pressing in light of the recent growing interest in designing graph foundation models. These models are supposed to be able to transfer to diverse graph datasets from different domains, and yet the proposed graph foundation models are often evaluated on a very limited set of datasets from narrow applications. To alleviate this issue, we introduce GraphLand: a benchmark of 14 diverse graph datasets for node property prediction from a range of different industrial applications. GraphLand allows evaluating graph ML models on a wide range of graphs with diverse sizes, structural characteristics, and feature sets, all in a unified setting. Further, GraphLand allows investigating such previously underexplored research questions as how realistic temporal distributional shifts under transductive and inductive settings influence graph ML model performance. To mimic realistic industrial settings, we use GraphLand to compare GNNs with gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDT) models that are popular in industrial applications and show that GBDTs provided with additional graph-based input features can sometimes be very strong baselines. Further, we evaluate currently available general-purpose graph foundation models and find that they fail to produce competitive results on our proposed datasets.
Gleb Bazhenov, Oleg Platonov, Liudmila Ostroumova
NeurIPS1
2023 Evaluating Robustness and Uncertainty of Graph Models Under Structural Distributional Shifts
abstract
In reliable decision-making systems based on machine learning, models have to be robust to distributional shifts or provide the uncertainty of their predictions. In node-level problems of graph learning, distributional shifts can be especially complex since the samples are interdependent. To evaluate the performance of graph models, it is important to test them on diverse and meaningful distributional shifts. However, most graph benchmarks considering distributional shifts for node-level problems focus mainly on node features, while structural properties are also essential for graph problems. In this work, we propose a general approach for inducing diverse distributional shifts based on graph structure. We use this approach to create data splits according to several structural node properties: popularity, locality, and density. In our experiments, we thoroughly evaluate the proposed distributional shifts and show that they can be quite challenging for existing graph models. We also reveal that simple models often outperform more sophisticated methods on the considered structural shifts. Finally, our experiments provide evidence that there is a trade-off between the quality of learned representations for the base classification task under structural distributional shift and the ability to separate the nodes from different distributions using these representations.
Gleb Bazhenov, Denis Kuznedelev, Andrey Malinin, Artem Babenko, Liudmila Ostroumova
NeurIPS1